Milošević Vuk, Malobabić Marina, Stojanović Ivana, Bašić Jelena
Clinic of Neurology, University Clinical Center Niš, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, Serbia.
Clinic of Neurology, University Clinical Center Niš, Serbia.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;214:107165. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107165. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
The Amsterdam instrumental activities of daily living questionnaire (A-IADL-Q) was developed as a sensitive tool in detecting a functional decline in early dementia. The aim of our study was to analyze the validity and reliability of the Serbian translation of the short version of A-IADL-Q in a population of memory clinic patients.
We have included 160 subjects with Alzhemier's disease (AD) dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or normal cognition (NC). All patients were examined by a neurologist, screened for cognitive impairment (MMSE) and depression, and referred to laboratory testing, neuroimaging examination, and neuropsychological assessment. Informants (close friends or relatives) completed Serbian language versions of the A-IADL-Q -Short version and the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (LB-IADL) scale. Reliability analysis was performed by assessing internal consistency and reproducibility (test-retest reliability). Construct validity was assessed as the impact of gender, аgе, education, diagnosis, cognitive and functional measures on A-IADL-Q scores.
The internal consistency of the Serbian version of A-IADL-Q was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha 0.82), Test-retest reliability of the A-IADL-Q was excellent (ICC=0.92, 95% CI 0.84-0.98, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in A-IADL-Q scores between male and female subjects (t = 1.183; p = 0.241), while the difference was registered between subjects with different education levels (F=12.955; p < 0.001) and diagnosis (F=209.433; p < 0.001). There was a strong and statistically significant correlation between A-IADL-Q and MMSE scores (tau-b= 0.638; p < 0.001) and IADL-Q and LB-ADL scores (tau-b=0.714; p < 0.001). A significant multiple regression model was found (F(4, 155) = 103.692;p < 0.001), which explained 72.1% of the A-IADL-Q score variance with MMSE score and age as significant predictors.
The Serbian adaptation of the A-IADL-Q-short version is a reliable and valid measure of instrumental activities of daily living in patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment. This easy-to-administer instrument is useful for the early diagnostics of dementia syndrome in a memory clinic population.
阿姆斯特丹日常生活工具性活动问卷(A-IADL-Q)是作为一种检测早期痴呆功能衰退的敏感工具而开发的。我们研究的目的是分析A-IADL-Q简版塞尔维亚语翻译版在记忆门诊患者群体中的有效性和可靠性。
我们纳入了160名患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆、轻度认知障碍(MCI)或认知正常(NC)的受试者。所有患者均由神经科医生进行检查,筛查认知障碍(MMSE)和抑郁情况,并接受实验室检测、神经影像学检查和神经心理学评估。 Informants(亲密朋友或亲属)完成了A-IADL-Q简版塞尔维亚语版本和劳顿-布罗迪日常生活工具性活动(LB-IADL)量表。通过评估内部一致性和可重复性(重测信度)进行信度分析。结构效度通过评估性别、年龄、教育程度、诊断、认知和功能测量对A-IADL-Q分数的影响来评估。
A-IADL-Q塞尔维亚语版本的内部一致性是可以接受的(Cronbach's alpha 0.82),A-IADL-Q的重测信度非常好(ICC = 0.92,95% CI 0.84 - 0.98,p < 0.001)。男性和女性受试者之间的A-IADL-Q分数没有统计学上的显著差异(t = 1.183;p = 0.241),而不同教育程度(F = 12.955;p < 0.001)和诊断(F = 209.433;p < 0.001)的受试者之间存在差异。A-IADL-Q与MMSE分数(tau-b = 0.638;p < 0.001)以及IADL-Q与LB-ADL分数(tau-b = 0.714;p < 0.001)之间存在强且统计学上显著的相关性。发现了一个显著的多元回归模型(F(4, 155) = 103.692;p < 0.001),该模型以MMSE分数和年龄作为显著预测因子,解释了A-IADL-Q分数方差的72.1%。
A-IADL-Q简版的塞尔维亚语改编版是痴呆和轻度认知障碍患者日常生活工具性活动的可靠且有效的测量工具。这种易于管理的工具对于记忆门诊人群中痴呆综合征的早期诊断很有用。