Post-randomization bias.
作者信息
Cook Chad, Garcia Alessandra N
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
出版信息
J Man Manip Ther. 2020 May;28(2):69-71. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1739153.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Post-randomization bias.随机化后偏倚
J Man Manip Ther. 2020 May;28(2):69-71. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1739153.
2
Randomization in clinical studies.临床研究中的随机化。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun;72(3):221-232. doi: 10.4097/kja.19049. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
3
Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.伪整群随机化解决了临床试验中的选择偏倚和污染问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.003. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
4
Randomization in clinical trials in orthodontics: its significance in research design and methods to achieve it.正畸临床研究中的随机化：其在研究设计和实现方法中的意义。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Dec;33(6):684-90. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq141. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
5
Does randomization introduce bias in unblinded trials?随机化会在非盲法试验中引入偏倚吗？
Epidemiology. 2000 Mar;11(2):228. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200003000-00025.
6
Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?倾向得分分析是避免分配偏倚的随机化有效替代方法吗？
Semin Liver Dis. 2017 Aug;37(3):275-286. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606213. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Bias in retrospective analyses of biomarker effect using data from an outcome-adaptive randomized trial.使用来自结果适应性随机试验的数据对生物标志物效应进行回顾性分析时的偏倚。
Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;16(6):599-609. doi: 10.1177/1740774519875969. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
8
On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.关于随机试验中信息偏倚和混杂偏倚的因果结构。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1214-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01347.x.
9
Re-randomization tests in clinical trials.临床试验中的重新随机化检验。
Stat Med. 2019 May 30;38(12):2292-2302. doi: 10.1002/sim.8093. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Accounting for cluster randomization: a review of primary prevention trials, 1990 through 1993.群组随机化的考量：1990年至1993年初级预防试验综述
Am J Public Health. 1995 Oct;85(10):1378-83. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.10.1378.
引用本文的文献
1
Why We Can Thrive past Seventy-Five: In Favor of Efforts to Extend the Human Lifespan.为何我们能活到七十五岁以上：支持延长人类寿命的努力。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2025 May-Jun;55(3):2-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.5007.
2
'Trustworthy' systematic reviews can only result in meaningful conclusions if the quality of randomized clinical trials and the certainty of evidence improves: an update on the 'trustworthy' living systematic review project.只有当随机临床试验的质量和证据的确定性得到改善时，“可信”的系统评价才能得出有意义的结论：“可信”的实时系统评价项目的最新情况
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Aug;32(4):363-367. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2377490. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
3
Why do 'Trustworthy' Living Systematic Reviews Matter?为什么“可信的”循证系统评价很重要？
J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Aug;31(4):215-219. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2229610.
4
Protocol for the development of a 'trustworthy' living systematic review and meta analyses of manual therapy interventions to treat neuromusculoskeletal impairments.制定“可靠”的系统综述和荟萃分析的方案，以评估手动治疗干预措施治疗神经肌肉骨骼损伤的效果。
J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Aug;31(4):220-230. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2119528. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews.系统评价的前瞻性注册是否会影响其质量：对系统的肌肉骨骼物理治疗评价的方法学回顾。
J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Jun;31(3):184-197. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2110419. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Big data vs accurate data in health research: Large-scale physical activity monitoring, smartphones, wearable devices and risk of unconscious bias.健康研究中的大数据与准确数据：大规模体力活动监测、智能手机、可穿戴设备与无意识偏见风险。
Med Hypotheses. 2018 Oct;119:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
2
Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review.骨科研究中的撤稿：一项系统综述。
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Jun;5(6):263-8. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.56.BJR-2016-0047.
3
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.在医疗保健干预随机试验的系统评价中，因对结果和分析进行选择性纳入及报告而产生的偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
4
Allegiance Bias and Therapist Effects: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Binge Eating Disorder.忠诚偏差与治疗师效应：暴食症随机对照试验的结果
Clin Psychol (New York). 2011 Jun;18(2):119-125. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2011.01243.x.
5
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告：干预描述和复制（TIDieR）清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
6
Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trials.临床 equipoise 和个人 equipoise：减少手法治疗试验偏差的两个必要因素。
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):55-7. doi: 10.1179/106698111X12899036752014.
7
Mode of administration bias.给药方式偏倚。
J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Jun;18(2):61-3. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12640740712617.
8
The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials.公共卫生临床试验中治疗保真度的评估、监测与提高
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71(s1):S52-S63. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x.
9
Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.实施至关重要：关于实施对项目成果的影响以及影响实施的因素的研究综述。
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
10
A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity.实施保真度的概念框架。
Implement Sci. 2007 Nov 30;2:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-40.
Zotero 插件