Ringel Carolyn B, Ringel Michael S, Caplan Arthur L
Hastings Cent Rep. 2025 May-Jun;55(3):2-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.5007.
About ten years ago, Ezekiel Emanuel wrote an article extolling the benefits of dying at seventy-five. Since then, longevity and aging interest, research, and funding have exploded. Much of the public is supportive of aging biology research, and books on extending the human lifespan populate bestseller lists. However, the issue remains hotly debated, and many articles published in the lay press spin the research in a negative light. Yet, if we collect these arguments and address each one logically, we see that each implies untenable conclusions. More to the point, there are strong arguments that human health and life have fundamental value and that incremental gains in health and in years of life will benefit us. For both ethical and practical reasons, we should support aging research.
大约十年前,伊齐基尔·伊曼纽尔撰写了一篇文章,颂扬七十五岁离世的益处。从那时起,对长寿与衰老的关注、研究及资金投入呈爆发式增长。许多公众支持衰老生物学研究,关于延长人类寿命的书籍充斥着畅销书榜单。然而,这一问题仍备受激烈争论,许多通俗报刊上发表的文章对该研究进行了负面解读。然而,如果我们收集这些论点并逐一进行逻辑分析,就会发现每个论点都暗含着站不住脚的结论。更重要的是,有充分的理由表明人类健康和生命具有基本价值,健康状况的逐步改善以及寿命的延长将对我们有益。出于伦理和实际原因,我们都应该支持衰老研究。