• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨学科团队在全科医疗中的系统用药审查:一种全面但繁琐的方法,用于解决老年患者的多重用药问题。

Systematic Medication Review in General Practice by an Interdisciplinary Team: A thorough but Laborious Method to Address Polypharmacy among Elderly Patients.

作者信息

Dalin Dagmar Abelone, Vermehren Charlotte, Jensen Anette Kobberø, Unkerskov Janne, Andersen Jon Trærup

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen DK-2400, Denmark.

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;8(2):57. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8020057.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy8020057
PMID:32244439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7356921/
Abstract

Polypharmacy increases the risk of hospitalization but may be reduced by medication review. The study objective is to describe and evaluate a method for conducting medication review in general practice by an interdisciplinary medication team of pharmacists and physicians-in this case conducted by a team from the Department of Clinical Pharmacology-based on information concerning medication, diagnosis, relevant laboratory data and medical history supplied by the general practitioner. We discussed the medication review with the patients' general practitioners and received feedback from them regarding acceptance rates of the recommended changes. Ninety-four patients with a total of 1471 prescriptions were included. A medication change was recommended for nearly half of the prescriptions (48%); at least one change of medication was recommended for all patients. The acceptance rate for recommended medication changes was 55%, corresponding to a mean of 4.2 accepted recommendations per patient. For 18% of all 1471 prescriptions, the general practitioner agreed either to discontinue (stop the medication completely) or reduce the dose of the medication. This method is thorough, but since it requires several healthcare professionals, it is rather time-consuming. There is a need to support medication review in general practice, but although this method may be too time consuming in most cases, it may nevertheless prove to be a useful tool managing the most complicated patients.

摘要

多重用药会增加住院风险,但通过药物审查可能会降低该风险。本研究的目的是描述和评估一种由药剂师和医生组成的跨学科药物团队在全科医疗中进行药物审查的方法——在本案例中,由临床药理学系的一个团队基于全科医生提供的有关用药、诊断、相关实验室数据和病史的信息来开展。我们与患者的全科医生讨论了药物审查情况,并收到了他们对推荐更改的接受率的反馈。纳入了94名患者,共有1471张处方。近一半的处方(48%)被建议进行药物更改;所有患者均至少有一项药物更改建议。推荐药物更改的接受率为55%,相当于每位患者平均有4.2项更改建议被接受。在所有1471张处方中,18%的处方,全科医生同意停用(完全停止用药)或减少药物剂量。这种方法很全面,但由于需要多名医疗保健专业人员参与,相当耗时。全科医疗中需要支持药物审查,虽然这种方法在大多数情况下可能过于耗时,但它可能仍是管理最复杂患者的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/fa56911f05ab/pharmacy-08-00057-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/676840a85c14/pharmacy-08-00057-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/14841da66013/pharmacy-08-00057-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/3a0fd4ab54dc/pharmacy-08-00057-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/44b3d6d6c759/pharmacy-08-00057-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/fa56911f05ab/pharmacy-08-00057-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/676840a85c14/pharmacy-08-00057-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/14841da66013/pharmacy-08-00057-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/3a0fd4ab54dc/pharmacy-08-00057-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/44b3d6d6c759/pharmacy-08-00057-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/191c/7356921/fa56911f05ab/pharmacy-08-00057-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic Medication Review in General Practice by an Interdisciplinary Team: A thorough but Laborious Method to Address Polypharmacy among Elderly Patients.跨学科团队在全科医疗中的系统用药审查:一种全面但繁琐的方法,用于解决老年患者的多重用药问题。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;8(2):57. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8020057.
2
Exploring the value of a multidisciplinary-led medication review for elderly individuals at a long-term care facility performed by four different health-care professions in an equal and closely integrated collaboration.探索由四个不同医疗保健专业以平等且紧密整合的协作方式,在长期护理机构为老年人开展多学科主导的药物审查的价值。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Aug;11(8):4519-4527. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_237_22. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
3
Development of a structured clinical pharmacology review for specialist support for management of complex polypharmacy in primary care.制定结构化临床药理学审查,为基层医疗中复杂的多种药物治疗管理提供专家支持。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;86(7):1326-1335. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14243. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
Polypharmacy in hospitalized older adult cancer patients: experience from a prospective, observational study of an oncology-acute care for elders unit.老年住院癌症患者的多重用药:一项针对老年肿瘤急症护理单元的前瞻性观察研究经验
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Jun;7(3):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.05.002.
5
Cooperation between geriatricians and general practitioners for improved pharmacotherapy in home-dwelling elderly people receiving polypharmacy - the COOP Study: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.老年科医生与全科医生合作以改善接受多重用药的居家老年人的药物治疗——COOP研究:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1900-0.
6
Appropriateness of prescribing among elderly patients in a Dutch residential home: observational study of outcomes after a pharmacist-led medication review.荷兰一家养老院老年患者的处方适宜性:药师主导的药物审查后结局的观察性研究
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(11):947-54. doi: 10.2165/0002512-200825110-00005.
7
The potential clinical benefits of medicines optimisation through comprehensive geriatric assessment, carried out by secondary care geriatricians, in a general practice care setting in North Staffordshire, UK: a feasibility study.通过在英国北斯塔福德郡的一般实践护理环境中由二级护理老年病学家进行全面老年评估来优化药物治疗的潜在临床获益:一项可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 28;7(9):e015278. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015278.
8
Changes in medicine prescription following a medication review in older high-risk patients with polypharmacy.老年高危多重用药患者药物审查后药物处方的变化。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Apr;40(2):480-487. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0602-3. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
9
Clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly people living in care homes--randomised controlled trial.养老院老年人临床用药审查——随机对照试验
Age Ageing. 2006 Nov;35(6):586-91. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl075. Epub 2006 Aug 12.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimising end-of-life geriatric pharmacotherapy: a hospital-based retrospective cohort study of deprescribing early in the care trajectory before hospice transition.优化老年临终药物治疗:一项基于医院的回顾性队列研究,关于在临终关怀过渡前的护理轨迹早期减停药物。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-02001-2.
2
Development of a medication review intervention by seconding a hospital pharmacist to primary care.通过借调医院药剂师到基层医疗来开展药物评估干预措施。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Sep 10;16:100505. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100505. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Tailoring a complex intervention to reduce antidepressants in institutionalized older persons with dementia.

本文引用的文献

1
Appropriateness of Medications in Older Adults Living With Frailty: Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Structured Medication Review Process in Primary Care.衰弱老年人用药的适宜性:初级保健中由药剂师主导的结构化药物审查流程的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec;10:2150132719890227. doi: 10.1177/2150132719890227.
2
Effects of medication reviews on use of potentially inappropriate medications in elderly patients; a cross-sectional study in Swedish primary care.药物审查对老年患者潜在不适当用药的影响;瑞典初级保健领域的一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 7;18(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3425-y.
3
针对机构内痴呆老年人群减少抗抑郁药物的复杂干预措施的定制。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):1582. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08961-9.
4
Barriers and enablers to deprescribing in long-term care: A qualitative investigation into the opinions of healthcare professionals in Ireland.长期护理中减少药物使用的障碍和促进因素:爱尔兰医疗保健专业人员意见的定性调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0274552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274552. eCollection 2022.
5
Exploration of Symptom Scale as an Outcome for Deprescribing: A Medication Review Study in Nursing Homes.探索症状量表作为减药结果指标:一项养老院药物审查研究
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Apr 21;15(5):505. doi: 10.3390/ph15050505.
Identifying frailty in primary care: A systematic review.
识别初级保健中的衰弱:系统评价。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Oct;17(10):1358-1377. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12955. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis.老年人因药物不良反应导致的住院情况:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;73(6):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2225-3. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
Usually Available Clinical and Laboratory Data Are Insufficient for a Valid Medication Review: A Crossover Study.通常可用的临床和实验室数据不足以进行有效的药物审查:一项交叉研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2016 Jan;20(1):71-6. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0678-1.
6
An evaluation of medication review reports across different settings.不同环境下药物审查报告的评估。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Feb;35(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9701-8. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
7
Medication review and reconciliation with cooperation between pharmacist and general practitioner and the benefit for the patient: a systematic review.药物审查和整合:药剂师与全科医生的合作以及对患者的获益:系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Jul;74(1):16-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04178.x.
8
Multidisciplinary medication review: evaluation of a pharmaceutical care model for nursing homes.多学科药物审查:养老院药学服务模式评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Jun;33(3):549-57. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9506-1. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
9
A retrospective study of drug-related problems in Australian aged care homes: medication reviews involving pharmacists and general practitioners.澳大利亚老年护理院药物相关问题的回顾性研究:药剂师和全科医生参与的药物评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;17(1):97-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01374.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
10
Are interventions recommended by pharmacists during Home Medicines Review evidence-based?家庭用药回顾中,药师推荐的干预措施是否有循证依据?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;17(1):104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01375.x. Epub 2010 Aug 15.