Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):807-814. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13288. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
To evaluate the effect of paid family leave in California on statewide rates of preterm birth, low birthweight, postneonatal mortality, and overall infant mortality.
Live birth and death certificates from all in-hospital deliveries occurring in California (state exposed to the family leave policy) and two unexposed states (Missouri and Pennsylvania) from 1999 to 2008 (n = 6 164 203).
We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare rates of infant health outcomes before and after implementation of the 2004 policy in California with rates in two states without paid family leave policies. Prespecified stratified analyses examined whether policy response differed by maternal characteristics. Conditional regression models using comparisons matched on a mother's likelihood of living in California in the pre-family leave period were then employed as sensitivity analyses to confirm our findings.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Probabilistic methods were used to match live birth records to maternal and newborn hospital records. Only singleton births were included. Dyads were excluded if the infant gestational age was <23 weeks or greater than 44 weeks or if the birthweight was an outlier.
Compared to the unexposed states, adjusted postneonatal mortality rates decreased by 12 percent in California after 2004 (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97). There were no significant effects on the other outcomes. There were no differences in the effect by race/ethnicity or insurance status except for increased odds of low birthweight among privately insured women in California after 2004. Point estimates in the propensity score-matched sensitivity models were similar to the results of the fully adjusted models for all four outcomes, but confidence intervals crossed one.
Implementation of paid family leave policies in California was associated with a 12 percent reduction in postneonatal mortality after adjusting for maternal and neonatal factors.
评估加利福尼亚州带薪家庭假对全州早产率、低出生体重率、新生儿后期死亡率和婴儿总体死亡率的影响。
1999 年至 2008 年加利福尼亚州(实施家庭休假政策的州)和两个未实施带薪家庭假政策的州(密苏里州和宾夕法尼亚州)所有住院分娩的活产和死亡证明(n=6164203)。
我们使用差异中的差异方法比较了加利福尼亚州 2004 年政策实施前后婴儿健康结果的比率与两个没有带薪家庭假政策的州的比率。预设分层分析检查了政策反应是否因产妇特征而异。然后使用条件回归模型,根据母亲在休假前期间居住在加利福尼亚州的可能性进行比较,作为敏感性分析来确认我们的发现。
数据收集/提取方法:使用概率方法将活产记录与产妇和新生儿医院记录相匹配。仅包括单胎分娩。如果婴儿胎龄<23 周或>44 周,或出生体重为异常值,则排除双生子。
与未暴露的州相比,加利福尼亚州 2004 年后调整后的新生儿后期死亡率降低了 12%(调整后的优势比 0.88,95%置信区间 0.80-0.97)。其他结果没有显著影响。种族/族裔或保险状况没有差异,但 2004 年后加利福尼亚州私人保险女性低出生体重的几率增加。倾向评分匹配敏感性模型中的点估计与所有四个结果的完全调整模型结果相似,但置信区间交叉。
在调整产妇和新生儿因素后,加利福尼亚州带薪家庭假政策的实施与新生儿后期死亡率降低 12%有关。