• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估患者家属顾问在以患者为导向的研究中的体验。

Evaluating the Patient Family Advisor Experience in Patient-Oriented Research.

作者信息

Flowers Michelle, Gunderson Janet, Hall Dale

机构信息

A patient engagement specialist with SCPOR working out of the Saskatchewan Health Quality Council. Her work focuses on supporting patients and research teams in patient-oriented research projects. She can be contacted at

A patient family advisor with the SCPOR Patient Family Advisory Council and the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research's (SPOR) Chronic Pain Network. She also volunteers with the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance and the Cochrane Collaboration.

出版信息

Healthc Q. 2020 Apr;23(1):28-33. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2020.26142.

DOI:10.12927/hcq.2020.26142
PMID:32249736
Abstract

As part of the Saskatchewan Centre for Patient-Oriented Research (SCPOR)'s commitment to improving the experience of patient and family advisors (PFAs) who engage with local patient-oriented research teams, one of the supports offered is an evaluation that assesses the experiences and effectiveness of PFAs as research team members. In a recent evaluation project, SCPOR used an academically validated questionnaire and a survey co-designed by local PFAs. The results showed that PFAs wanted more frequent updates throughout the research project and greater role clarity. They also reported that the best part of their engagement was feeling like a valued team member.

摘要

作为萨斯喀彻温省患者导向研究中心(SCPOR)致力于改善参与当地患者导向研究团队的患者及家属顾问(PFA)体验的一部分,提供的支持之一是一项评估,该评估旨在评估PFA作为研究团队成员的体验和有效性。在最近的一个评估项目中,SCPOR使用了经过学术验证的问卷以及由当地PFA共同设计的调查。结果显示,PFA希望在整个研究项目中能更频繁地获得进展更新,并且角色能更清晰明确。他们还表示,参与研究最棒的部分是感觉自己是有价值的团队成员。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Patient Family Advisor Experience in Patient-Oriented Research.评估患者家属顾问在以患者为导向的研究中的体验。
Healthc Q. 2020 Apr;23(1):28-33. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2020.26142.
2
The Creation of a Tool to Measure Engagement in Patient-Oriented Research.一种用于衡量参与以患者为导向研究程度的工具的创建。
Healthc Q. 2020 Apr;23(1):34-38. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2020.26141.
3
Bringing Value-Based Perspectives to Care: Including Patient and Family Members in Decision-Making Processes.将价值为基础的观点引入医疗照护:让患者及其家属参与决策过程。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Nov 1;6(11):661-668. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.27.
4
Engagement of patient and family advisors in health system redesign in Canada.患者和家庭顾问参与加拿大卫生系统重新设计。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):25-33. doi: 10.1177/13558196221109056. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
5
Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement.了解患者的动机:一个共同设计的项目,旨在了解患者参与背后的因素。
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):709-720. doi: 10.1111/hex.12942. Epub 2019 Aug 4.
6
Patient family advisors' perspectives on engagement in health-care quality improvement initiatives: Power and partnership.患者家属顾问对参与医疗质量改进计划的看法:权力与合作。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):379-386. doi: 10.1111/hex.12633. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
Engaging Patient and Family Advisors in Health-Care System Planning: Experiences and Recommendations.让患者及家属顾问参与医疗保健系统规划:经验与建议
J Patient Exp. 2020 Jun;7(3):331-337. doi: 10.1177/2374373519840343. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
8
How a simple 'thank you' could improve clinical trials.一句简单的“谢谢”如何能改善临床试验。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7731):293-294. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07410-0.
9
What constitutes meaningful engagement for patients and families as partners on research teams?患者及其家属作为研究团队的合作伙伴,什么样的参与才算有意义?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):158-167. doi: 10.1177/1355819618762960. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
10
Towards expanding the acute care team: Learning how to involve families in care processes.迈向扩大急性护理团队:学习如何让家庭参与护理过程。
Fam Syst Health. 2015 Sep;33(3):242-9. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000118. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
"I think there has to be a mutual respect for there to be value": Evaluating patient engagement in a national clinical trial on de-implementation of low value care.“我认为要想实现价值,必须要有相互尊重”:评估患者在一项关于减少低价值医疗服务实施的全国性临床试验中的参与情况。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 26;9(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00483-w.
2
Patient and caregiver perspectives on virtual care: a patient-oriented qualitative study.患者和照护者对虚拟医疗的看法:一项以患者为导向的定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 1;10(1):E165-E172. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210065. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.