• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯坦福监狱实验中的领导力争议:回应津巴多和哈尼(2020)与陈等人(2020)。

Debate around leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020).

机构信息

School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews.

Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):406-407. doi: 10.1037/amp0000627.

DOI:10.1037/amp0000627
PMID:32250145
Abstract

Access to the Stanford University archive has revealed new material that makes it possible to debate the precise nature and causes of events in the Stanford Prison Experiment. What the authors see as important is that these materials show the experimenters engaged in processes of identity leadership, which encouraged guard cruelty by presenting it as necessary for the achievement of noble collective goals. However, the authors encourage students, teachers, and researchers to engage with this new material themselves to explore alternative perspectives on what actually occurred in the study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

斯坦福大学档案馆的资料显示,有关斯坦福监狱实验的确切性质和原因的讨论有了新的素材。作者认为,这些材料表明实验者进行了身份领导过程,通过将其呈现为实现崇高集体目标的必要条件,鼓励看守人员的残忍行为。然而,作者鼓励学生、教师和研究人员自己利用这些新材料,探索对该研究中实际发生的事情的替代观点。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

相似文献

1
Debate around leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020).斯坦福监狱实验中的领导力争议:回应津巴多和哈尼(2020)与陈等人(2020)。
Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):406-407. doi: 10.1037/amp0000627.
2
Rethinking the nature of cruelty: The role of identity leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment.重新思考残忍的本质:身份领导在斯坦福监狱实验中的作用。
Am Psychol. 2019 Oct;74(7):809-822. doi: 10.1037/amp0000443. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Identity leadership is manifested via integrative complexity: Comment on Haslam et al. (2019).身份领导表现为整合复杂性:评 Haslam 等人(2019 年)。
Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):403-405. doi: 10.1037/amp0000618.
4
Continuing to acknowledge the power of dehumanizing environments: Comment on Haslam et al. (2019) and Le Texier (2019).继续认识到非人环境的力量:评论哈斯拉姆等人(2019 年)和勒泰克西埃(2019 年)的观点。
Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):400-402. doi: 10.1037/amp0000593.
5
Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?重温斯坦福监狱实验:参与者的自我选择会导致残忍行为吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 May;33(5):603-14. doi: 10.1177/0146167206292689. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
6
Prison break: Karl Menninger's The Crime of Punishment and its reception in U.S. psychology.《越狱:卡尔·门宁格的〈惩罚之罪〉及其在美国心理学界的反响》
Hist Psychol. 2017 Feb;20(1):92-121. doi: 10.1037/hop0000051. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
7
Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.斯坦福监狱实验的破解。
Am Psychol. 2019 Oct;74(7):823-839. doi: 10.1037/amp0000401. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Philip G. Zimbardo on his career and the Stanford Prison Experiment's 40th anniversary.
Hist Psychol. 2012 May;15(2):161-70. doi: 10.1037/a0025884.
9
Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment, again: Examining demand characteristics in the guard orientation.再谈斯坦福监狱实验:看守定向中的需求特征研究。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(6):780-790. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1596058. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
When prisoners take over the prison: a social psychology of resistance.当囚犯接管监狱:抵抗的社会心理学。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 May;16(2):154-79. doi: 10.1177/1088868311419864. Epub 2011 Sep 1.