Suppr超能文献

斯坦福监狱实验中的领导力争议:回应津巴多和哈尼(2020)与陈等人(2020)。

Debate around leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment: Reply to Zimbardo and Haney (2020) and Chan et al. (2020).

机构信息

School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews.

Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):406-407. doi: 10.1037/amp0000627.

Abstract

Access to the Stanford University archive has revealed new material that makes it possible to debate the precise nature and causes of events in the Stanford Prison Experiment. What the authors see as important is that these materials show the experimenters engaged in processes of identity leadership, which encouraged guard cruelty by presenting it as necessary for the achievement of noble collective goals. However, the authors encourage students, teachers, and researchers to engage with this new material themselves to explore alternative perspectives on what actually occurred in the study. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

斯坦福大学档案馆的资料显示,有关斯坦福监狱实验的确切性质和原因的讨论有了新的素材。作者认为,这些材料表明实验者进行了身份领导过程,通过将其呈现为实现崇高集体目标的必要条件,鼓励看守人员的残忍行为。然而,作者鼓励学生、教师和研究人员自己利用这些新材料,探索对该研究中实际发生的事情的替代观点。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验