Dundas S A, Laing R W, O'Cathain A, Seddon I, Slater D N, Stephenson T J, Underwood J C
Department of Pathology, Sheffield University Medical School.
J Clin Pathol. 1988 Dec;41(12):1273-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.12.1273.
Sixty slides from 60 blocks taken from 30 colonic carcinomas were circulated twice to six histopathologists of varying experience. Five of the six pathologists showed a good to excellent intraobserver agreement for assessment of the character of the invasive margin (0.44 less than kappa less than 0.82), which was not significantly affected by sampling (0.40 less than kappa less than 0.56, comparing both slides from each tumour) or observer (five of six pathologists agreeing on 46 of 60 slides). Pathologists were unreliable in assessing peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrates, with only two pathologists achieving moderate levels of intraobserver agreement (-0.03 less than kappa less than 0.52). The interobserver agreement for peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrates was also low (kappa less than 0.29) between the three most experienced pathologists. The assessment of peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrates was significantly affected by sampling, the two pathologists with the lowest intraobserver variation achieving kappa values of 0.21 and 0.10 between the 30 paired slides from each tumour. The character of the invasive margin was reliably assessed, was not dependent on sample, and added useful prognostic information, but peritumoural lymphocytic infiltration is not a reproducible observation and may therefore not add useful prognostic information in routine use.
从30例结肠癌的60个组织块制作的60张玻片分两次发给6位经验各异的组织病理学家。6位病理学家中有5位在评估浸润边缘特征方面表现出良好至优秀的观察者内一致性(kappa值在0.44至0.82之间),这不受取材影响(比较每个肿瘤的两张玻片,kappa值在0.40至0.56之间)或观察者影响(6位病理学家中有5位在60张玻片中的46张上达成一致)。病理学家在评估肿瘤周围淋巴细胞浸润方面不可靠,只有两位病理学家达到中等水平的观察者内一致性(kappa值在-0.03至0.52之间)。在三位经验最丰富的病理学家之间,肿瘤周围淋巴细胞浸润的观察者间一致性也很低(kappa值小于0.29)。肿瘤周围淋巴细胞浸润的评估受取材显著影响,观察者内差异最小的两位病理学家在每个肿瘤的30对玻片之间的kappa值分别为0.21和0.10。浸润边缘的特征评估可靠,不依赖于样本,并增加了有用的预后信息,但肿瘤周围淋巴细胞浸润不是一个可重复的观察结果,因此在常规应用中可能不会增加有用的预后信息。