• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旅游和自然资源对生态足迹的影响:以东盟国家为例。

The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries.

机构信息

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.

School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):19251-19264. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08582-x. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-08582-x
PMID:32253690
Abstract

This study examines the impacts of economic growth, energy consumption, tourism, and natural resources on the ecological footprint in the ASEAN countries for spanning from 1995 to 2016. For this purpose, the cross-sectional dependent test, the second-generation unit root test, and the Westerlund cointegration test have been applied. The Driscoll-Kraay panel regression model has been used to check the long-run relationship among the series. Also, the Dumitrescu-Hurlin panel causality test is used to determine the paths of causal interactions. These tests help to overcome the problem of cross-sectional dependence in panel data analysis. The results showed an inverted U-shaped EKC behavior in ASEAN countries, hence a negative relation between tourism and natural resources with the ecological footprint. This implies that tourism and natural resources help to improve the environmental quality in ASEAN countries.

摘要

本研究考察了 1995 年至 2016 年期间,经济增长、能源消耗、旅游和自然资源对东盟国家生态足迹的影响。为此,应用了横截面相依检验、第二代单位根检验和 Westerlund 协整检验。使用 Driscoll-Kraay 面板回归模型来检验序列之间的长期关系。此外,还使用 Dumitrescu-Hurlin 面板因果关系检验来确定因果关系的路径。这些检验有助于解决面板数据分析中的横截面相关性问题。结果表明,东盟国家存在倒 U 型 EKC 行为,因此旅游和自然资源与生态足迹之间存在负相关关系。这意味着旅游和自然资源有助于提高东盟国家的环境质量。

相似文献

1
The impact of tourism and natural resources on the ecological footprint: a case study of ASEAN countries.旅游和自然资源对生态足迹的影响:以东盟国家为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):19251-19264. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08582-x. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Do natural resources affect environmental quality in MINT Economies? The role of tourism and financial development.自然资源会影响“薄荷四国”经济体的环境质量吗?旅游业与金融发展的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Oct;30(47):103958-103971. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29520-7. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
3
Informal economy and ecological footprint: the case of Africa.非正式经济与生态足迹:以非洲为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(49):74756-74771. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20919-2. Epub 2022 May 31.
4
Effects of tourism and eco-innovation on environmental quality in selected ASEAN countries.旅游和生态创新对部分东盟国家环境质量的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):42889-42903. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17541-z. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
The intermittent effects of renewable energy on ecological footprint: evidence from developing countries.可再生能源对生态足迹的间歇性影响:来自发展中国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(40):56401-56417. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14600-3. Epub 2021 May 30.
6
The dynamic links among energy consumption, tourism growth, and the ecological footprint: the role of environmental quality in 38 IEA countries.能源消费、旅游增长与生态足迹的动态联系:环境质量在 38 个国际能源机构国家中的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(5):5049-5062. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10861-6. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
7
Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?中东欧国家金融发展、能源消耗、收入水平与生态足迹的关系:人力资本和生物承载力重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31856-31872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
An empirical nexus between economic growth, energy utilization, trade policy, and ecological footprint: a continent-wise comparison in upper-middle-income countries.经济增长、能源利用、贸易政策和生态足迹之间的经验关系:中上收入国家按大洲的比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Nov;27(31):38995-39018. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09772-3. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
The effects of international tourism, electricity consumption, and economic growth on CO2 emissions in North Africa.北非国际旅游、电力消费和经济增长对二氧化碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(32):44028-44038. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13818-5. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
10
Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries.技术创新、金融发展、可再生能源与生态足迹的动态关系:基于亚太经合组织国家 STIRPAT 模型的新见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(12):15519-15536. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z. Epub 2020 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of digital economic growth and financial expansion on CO2 mitigation strategies in leading emitting countries.数字经济增长和金融扩张对主要排放国二氧化碳减排策略的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10515. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86412-1.
2
Digital governance leveraging urbanization and fintech synergies for sustainable development in BRICS.利用城市化与金融科技协同效应实现金砖国家可持续发展的数字治理
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):31677. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81712-4.
3
Sustainable development in Southeast Asia: The nexus of tourism, finance, and environment.
东南亚的可持续发展:旅游、金融与环境的关系
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 29;10(24):e40829. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40829. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
4
Examining the environmental consequences of China's mineral wealth and governance in the context of the natural resource curse.在自然资源诅咒的背景下审视中国矿产财富与治理的环境后果。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(17):e35891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35891. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
5
Does foreign direct investment affect environmental degradation: Evidence from largest carbon intense countries.外国直接投资是否会影响环境恶化:来自最大碳密集型国家的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0314232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314232. eCollection 2024.
6
Spillover impacts of financial development and globalization on environmental quality in ASEAN countries.金融发展与全球化对东盟国家环境质量的溢出效应。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 25;10(9):e30149. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30149. eCollection 2024 May 15.
7
Foreign investments and load capacity factor in BRICS: the moderating role of environmental policy stringency.金砖国家的外国投资与负荷因子:环境政策严格程度的调节作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11228-11242. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31814-9. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
8
Analyzing the linkages of rural tourism, GDP, energy utilization, and environment: Exploring a sustainable path for China.分析乡村旅游、国内生产总值、能源利用与环境之间的联系:探索中国的可持续发展道路。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 25;9(12):e22697. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22697. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Clean energy-led tourism development in Malaysia: Do environmental degradation, FDI, Education and ICT matter?马来西亚以清洁能源为主导的旅游业发展:环境退化、外国直接投资、教育和信息通信技术重要吗?
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 4;9(11):e21779. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21779. eCollection 2023 Nov.
10
Exposing the environmental impacts of air transportation on the ecological system: empirical evidence from APEC countries.揭示航空运输对生态系统的环境影响:来自亚太经合组织国家的实证证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 4;9(9):e19835. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19835. eCollection 2023 Sep.