Van Loon Jelle, Woltering Lennart, Krupnik Timothy J, Baudron Frédéric, Boa Maria, Govaerts Bram
CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Carretera México-Veracruz km. 45, El Batán, Texcoco, C.P. 56237, Estado de México, Mexico.
CIMMYT-Bangladesh, House 10/B. Road 53. Gulshan-2, Dhaka 1213, Bangladesh.
Agric Syst. 2020 Apr;180:102792. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102792.
There is great untapped potential for farm mechanization to support rural development initiatives in low- and middle-income countries. As technology transfer of large machinery from high-income countries was ineffective during the 1980s and 90s, mechanization options were developed appropriate to resource poor farmers cultivating small and scattered plots. More recently, projects that aim to increase the adoption of farm machinery have tended to target service providers rather than individual farmers. This paper uses the Scaling Scan tool to assess three project case studies designed to scale different Mechanization Service Provider Models (MSPMs) in Mexico, Zimbabwe, and Bangladesh. It provides a useful framework to assess the gap between international lessons learned on scaling captured in forty tactical questions over ten "scaling ingredients" as perceived by stakeholders involved in the projects, as well as private sector actors and government employees. Although at first sight the case studies seem to successfully reach high numbers of end users, the assessment exposes issues around the sustainable and transformative nature of the interventions. These are highly influenced by the design of the projects and by the environment and context of the intervention areas. Across the three case studies, large-scale adoption of the models was found to be hampered by lack of finance to set up MSPMs and insufficient collaboration among the value chain actors to strengthen and foster Mechanization Service Provider (MSP) entrepreneurs. Applying a scaling perspective on each case study project exposed important lessons on minimizing project dependencies. Positive examples include integration of capacity development materials in vocational training centers in Zimbabwe, promotion of MSPMs by other donors in East Africa and levering of nearly USD six million of private sector investment in appropriate machinery in Bangladesh. On the other hand, there is still a high dependency on the projects in terms of coaching of service providers, facilitating collaboration along the value chain, and provision of leadership and advocacy to address issues at governance level. These results have important implications for similar development interventions aimed at increasing smallholder access to mechanization services at scale and is to our knowledge the first cross-continental assessment of these issues to date.
在低收入和中等收入国家,农业机械化对于支持农村发展倡议具有巨大的未开发潜力。由于20世纪80年代和90年代从高收入国家引进大型机械的技术转让效果不佳,因此开发了适合资源匮乏、耕种小块分散土地农民的机械化方案。最近,旨在提高农业机械采用率的项目往往以服务提供商而非个体农民为目标。本文使用规模扫描工具评估了三个项目案例研究,这些案例研究旨在扩大墨西哥、津巴布韦和孟加拉国不同的机械化服务提供商模式(MSPM)。它提供了一个有用的框架,用于评估项目相关利益者以及私营部门行为者和政府雇员所认为的,在十个“扩大规模要素”的四十个策略性问题中所总结的国际扩大规模经验教训之间的差距。尽管乍一看案例研究似乎成功地覆盖了大量终端用户,但评估揭示了干预措施的可持续性和变革性方面的问题。这些问题受到项目设计以及干预地区的环境和背景的高度影响。在这三个案例研究中,发现由于缺乏建立机械化服务提供商模式的资金以及价值链参与者之间加强和扶持机械化服务提供商(MSP)企业家的合作不足,这些模式的大规模采用受到阻碍。从扩大规模的角度对每个案例研究项目进行分析,揭示了关于尽量减少项目依赖性的重要经验教训。积极的例子包括在津巴布韦的职业培训中心整合能力发展材料、东非其他捐助者对机械化服务提供商模式的推广,以及在孟加拉国撬动近600万美元的私营部门对适用机械的投资。另一方面,在服务提供商的指导、促进价值链上的合作以及提供领导力和宣传以解决治理层面的问题方面,仍然高度依赖项目。这些结果对于旨在大规模增加小农户获得机械化服务机会的类似发展干预措施具有重要意义,据我们所知,这是迄今为止对这些问题的首次跨大陆评估。