Suppr超能文献

检验医学中溶血干扰研究的方法——一项批判性综述

Methods for Hemolysis Interference Study in Laboratory Medicine - A Critical Review.

作者信息

Marques-Garcia Fernando

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

EJIFCC. 2020 Mar 20;31(1):85-97. eCollection 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Hemolysis represents an important source of error associated with the pre-analytical phase. Improving the protocols for detection, measurement, management of the parameters affected by the interference, and differentiation between hemolysis and , would favor a personalized management of hemolysis by increasing patient safety. For this, it is essential to agree on the definition of "hemolysis". From this definition, a critical point is to establish cut-offs of hemolysis management for each analyte studied in the clinical laboratory. Thus, in this review, the main methods described in the literature developed for obtaining a hemolysate are grouped, that simulate in controlled laboratory protocols what happens with a hemolyzed sample of a patient. These methods are grouped into 3 categories according to their basis of lysing cells: freezing-thawing, osmotic shock and shear stress. In addition to development and improvement of methods for the study of hemolysis, it is necessary to carry out comparative studies to determine which one offers the best capabilities. Harmonization of the methods will allow to include them in working guidelines. All these strategies will allow to move from managing hemolysis on whole-sample basis to customize it analyte by analyte.

摘要

溶血是与分析前阶段相关的一个重要误差来源。改进受干扰影响的参数的检测、测量、管理方案,以及区分溶血与[此处原文缺失部分内容],将通过提高患者安全性来促进溶血的个性化管理。为此,就“溶血”的定义达成共识至关重要。基于这一定义,关键在于为临床实验室研究的每种分析物确定溶血管理的临界值。因此,在本综述中,对文献中描述的用于获得溶血产物的主要方法进行了归类,这些方法在可控的实验室方案中模拟患者溶血样本的情况。这些方法根据其裂解细胞的原理分为3类:冻融法、渗透休克法和剪切应力法。除了开发和改进溶血研究方法外,还需要进行比较研究以确定哪种方法具有最佳性能。方法的统一将使其能够纳入工作指南。所有这些策略将有助于从基于全样本管理溶血转变为逐个分析物进行定制化管理。

相似文献

2
Managing hemolyzed samples in clinical laboratories.临床实验室中溶血样本的处理
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2020 Jan;57(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1664391. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Comparison of three different protocols for obtaining hemolysis.三种不同溶血方法的比较。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Feb 23;60(5):714-725. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-1227. Print 2022 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

2
Hematological investigations in a case of intravascular hemolysis due to infection.因感染导致血管内溶血的血液学检查。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2024 Jun 15;34(2):021001. doi: 10.11613/BM.2024.021001. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
6
Blood component separation in straight microfluidic channels.直微流控通道中的血液成分分离
Biomicrofluidics. 2023 Oct 16;17(5):054106. doi: 10.1063/5.0176457. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of ZIF-67.ZIF-67 的抗菌和抗生物膜活性。
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2023 Oct;76(10):603-612. doi: 10.1038/s41429-023-00637-8. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
The Issue With Osmotic Shock Hemolysate Preparation Procedure.渗透休克溶血产物制备程序的问题。
Ann Lab Med. 2023 Sep 1;43(5):512-514. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.5.512. Epub 2023 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

3
Internal quality assurance of HIL indices on Roche Cobas c702.罗氏 Cobas c702 仪器 HIL 指数的内部质量保证。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0200088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200088. eCollection 2018.
8
Visual assessment of hemolysis affects patient safety.肉眼评估溶血会影响患者安全。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Mar 28;56(4):574-581. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0532.
9
Visual assessment of sample quality: quo usque tandem?样本质量的视觉评估:究竟要到何时?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Mar 28;56(4):513-515. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0867.
10
Causes, consequences and management of sample hemolysis in the clinical laboratory.临床实验室样本溶血的原因、后果及处理
Clin Biochem. 2017 Dec;50(18):1317-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验