• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人机交互界面布局的视觉美学的定量评估。

Quantitative Evaluation of Visual Aesthetics of Human-Machine Interaction Interface Layout.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Equipment, Ministry of Education, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China.

School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China.

出版信息

Comput Intell Neurosci. 2020 Mar 10;2020:9815937. doi: 10.1155/2020/9815937. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/9815937
PMID:32256556
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7085848/
Abstract

The current research on human-machine interaction interface layout focused on ergonomic analysis, while the research on aesthetics and aesthetic degree calculation of interface layout was insufficient. In order to objectively evaluate the aesthetic degree of interface layout, this paper put forward an aesthetic degree evaluation method of interface design based on Kansei engineering. Firstly, the perceptual image structure of interface aesthetic degree was analyzed from the perspective of aesthetic cognition. Six aesthetic image factors affecting interface aesthetic degree, including proportion, conciseness, order, rhythm, density, and equilibrium, were extracted by factor analysis method, and the variance contribution rate of each factor was taken as the weight. Secondly, according to the six aesthetic degree indexes, the calculation system of interface aesthetic degree was constructed, and the aesthetic degree value of aesthetic image factor was calculated by the corresponding aesthetic degree evaluation mathematical formula. Then, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was used to analyze the order of aesthetic degree superiority of design schemes, and the comprehensive aesthetic degree evaluation was carried out. Finally, the aesthetic degree evaluation of human-machine interaction interface layout of the driller's console of an AC variable frequency drilling rig was taken as an example to verify that this method was helpful for designers to optimize the design scheme. The experimental results showed that the proposed method was feasible and effective compared with the method of paired comparison commonly used in psychophysics.

摘要

当前,人机交互界面布局的研究主要集中在人体工程学分析方面,而对界面布局的美学和美学程度计算的研究还不够充分。为了客观评估界面布局的美学程度,本文提出了一种基于感性工程的界面设计美学程度评估方法。首先,从审美认知的角度分析了界面美学程度的感性意象结构。通过因子分析方法提取了影响界面美学程度的六个美学意象因素,包括比例、简洁、有序、节奏、密度和平衡,并以各因素的方差贡献率作为权重。其次,根据六个美学程度指标,构建了界面美学程度的计算体系,并通过相应的美学程度评价数学公式计算美学意象因素的美学程度值。然后,采用逼近理想解的排序方法(TOPSIS)分析设计方案的美学程度优势顺序,并进行综合美学程度评价。最后,以交流变频钻机司钻控制台的人机交互界面布局的美学程度评估为例进行验证,结果表明该方法有助于设计师优化设计方案。与心理物理学中常用的配对比较方法相比,实验结果表明,该方法具有可行性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f852/7085848/511088107de8/CIN2020-9815937.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f852/7085848/511088107de8/CIN2020-9815937.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f852/7085848/511088107de8/CIN2020-9815937.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative Evaluation of Visual Aesthetics of Human-Machine Interaction Interface Layout.人机交互界面布局的视觉美学的定量评估。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2020 Mar 10;2020:9815937. doi: 10.1155/2020/9815937. eCollection 2020.
2
Layout Design of Human-Machine Interaction Interface of Cabin Based on Cognitive Ergonomics and GA-ACA.基于认知工效学与遗传算法-蚁群算法的座舱人机交互界面布局设计
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2016;2016:1032139. doi: 10.1155/2016/1032139. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
3
What Would a Graph Look Like in this Layout? A Machine Learning Approach to Large Graph Visualization.这种布局下的图形会是什么样子?一种用于大规模图可视化的机器学习方法。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Jan;24(1):478-488. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743858. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
4
Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology.工程美学与审美人机工程学:理论基础与双过程研究方法
Ergonomics. 2003;46(13-14):1273-92. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001610829.
5
A Review of EEG and fMRI Measuring Aesthetic Processing in Visual User Experience Research.脑电(electroencephalogram, EEG)和功能磁共振成像(functional magnetic resonance imaging, fMRI)在视觉用户体验研究中评估美学处理的综述。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Dec 16;2021:2070209. doi: 10.1155/2021/2070209. eCollection 2021.
6
And the nominees are: Using design-awards datasets to build computational aesthetic evaluation model.提名的有:利用设计奖项数据集构建计算美学评估模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0227754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227754. eCollection 2020.
7
Webpage aesthetics, performance and usability: design variables and their effects.网页美学、性能与可用性:设计变量及其影响。
Ergonomics. 2009 Jun;52(6):631-43. doi: 10.1080/00140130802558995.
8
Cognitive Matching of Design Subjects in Product Form Evolutionary Design.产品形态进化设计中设计主题的认知匹配。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Sep 30;2021:8456736. doi: 10.1155/2021/8456736. eCollection 2021.
9
Fusion of multichannel local and global structural cues for photo aesthetics evaluation.多通道局部和全局结构线索融合进行照片美学评价。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2014 Mar;23(3):1419-29. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2014.2303650.
10
HOLA: Human-like Orthogonal Network Layout.HOLA:类人正交网络布局。
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016 Jan;22(1):349-58. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467451. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Layout Order on Interface Complexity: An Eye-Tracking Study for Dashboard Design.布局顺序对界面复杂度的影响:仪表盘设计的眼动追踪研究
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;24(18):5966. doi: 10.3390/s24185966.
2
The influence of target layout and target graphic type on searching performance based on eye-tracking technology.基于眼动追踪技术的目标布局和目标图形类型对搜索性能的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1052488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1052488. eCollection 2023.
3
The Implicit Aesthetic Preference for Mobile Marketing Interface Layout-An ERP Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of four user interface concepts on visual scan pattern similarity and information foraging in a complex decision making task.四种用户界面概念对复杂决策任务中视觉扫描模式相似性和信息搜索的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul;70:6-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
2
The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability.设计美学在可用性测试中的影响:对用户绩效和感知可用性的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2010 May;41(3):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
3
A blessing, not a curse: experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance.
移动营销界面布局的内隐审美偏好——一项ERP研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 30;15:728895. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.728895. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessment of Augmented Reality in Manual Wiring Production Process with Use of Mobile AR Glasses.使用移动增强现实眼镜评估手动布线生产过程中的增强现实技术。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 22;20(17):4755. doi: 10.3390/s20174755.
福兮,祸之所倚:视觉美学对表现的有益影响的实验证据。
Ergonomics. 2009 Oct;52(10):1311-20. doi: 10.1080/00140130903061717.
4
The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion.可用性测试中原型逼真度和设计美学的影响:对用户行为、主观评价及情感的作用。
Appl Ergon. 2009 Jul;40(4):670-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
5
Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development.感性工学作为一种面向消费者的强大产品开发技术。
Appl Ergon. 2002 May;33(3):289-94. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(02)00019-4.