Widell Jonas, Lidén Mats
Department of Radiology, Örebro University Hospital, Region Örebro County, Sweden.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2020 Mar 31;7:100228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100228. eCollection 2020.
To quantify the interobserver variability among the most frequently encountered parenchymal patterns in High Resolution CT (HRCT) and to compare the interobserver variability in the application of the 2011 and 2018 usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) criteria according to the joint guidelines from international thoracic and respiratory societies.
Two observers independently evaluated 126 HRCT, with examples of most common parenchymal patterns, and noted the presence of each pattern. The readers also noted whether the findings met the 2011 criteria for UIP. In a second reading, the same readers noted whether the HRCT met the UIP criteria according to the 2018 UIP update.
The kappa values for interobserver variability for the different patterns ranged from 0.28 (intralobular lines) to 0.85 (tree-in-bud nodules). The kappa value for UIP pattern was similar for 2011 and 2018 criteria, 0.58 and 0.69, respectively. Compared to the 2011 UIP criteria, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of HRCT classified as UIP using the 2018 criteria.
There is a substantial variation in interobserver agreement between the different parenchymal patterns, which suggests that some patterns a more easily identified than others. There is also a considerable reader variation in the assessment of UIP applying the 2011 UIP criteria as well as applying the 2018 UIP update.
量化高分辨率CT(HRCT)中最常见的实质模式之间的观察者间变异性,并根据国际胸科和呼吸学会的联合指南,比较2011年和2018年普通间质性肺炎(UIP)标准应用中的观察者间变异性。
两名观察者独立评估了126例HRCT,其中包含最常见的实质模式示例,并记录每种模式的存在情况。读者还记录了这些发现是否符合2011年UIP标准。在第二次阅读中,相同的读者记录了HRCT是否符合2018年UIP更新后的UIP标准。
不同模式的观察者间变异性的kappa值范围为0.28(小叶内线)至0.85(芽生结节)。2011年和2018年标准下UIP模式的kappa值相似,分别为0.58和0.69。与2011年UIP标准相比,使用2018年标准分类为UIP的HRCT数量没有统计学上的显著差异。
不同实质模式之间的观察者间一致性存在很大差异,这表明某些模式比其他模式更容易识别。在应用2011年UIP标准以及应用2018年UIP更新版对UIP进行评估时,读者之间也存在相当大的差异。