Duncan Orianna, Cook Emily C, Pimental Donald, Wilkinson Kristen, Champagne Amber
Department of Psychology, Rhode Island College, 600 Mount Pleasant Ave., Providence, RI 02908, USA.
University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, USA.
Adolesc Res Rev. 2019 Dec;4(4):341-356. doi: 10.1007/s40894-018-0087-2. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
Laboratory models that help us understand the neural mechanisms associated with how stress, particularly interpersonal stress, affects children's and adolescents' emotions are paramount but are limited if that understanding lacks validity in adolescents' daily lives. There is a lack of research that addresses the ecological validity of visual stimuli to induce stress in participants while measuring participants' neural response to that stimuli. This approach is needed if we are to identify the neural mechanisms that underlie the effect of stressful events on individuals' emotional functioning. The current study conducted a systematic literature review to identify visual tasks that have been used in laboratory settings to induce stress in participants. The most frequent tasks identified were developed to induce peer rejection/exclusion in youth (e.g., Chatroom and Cyberball). These tasks were generally effective at bringing about a neural response in areas of the brain traditionally associated with social cognitive processing, such as the cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, insula, and striatum. In particular, the cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex are associated with the Social Information Processing Network. Almost entirely absent from the literature are systematic evaluations of ecological validity and parent-child based visual stimuli that approximate the stress that adolescents might experience in their relationships with parents. The present article highlights trends and gaps in the current research, and examines the ecological validity of current stimuli used as laboratory based stressors, which can be used to fuel further investigation into adolescent neural response to stimuli, and further evaluation of the ecological validity of tasks.
有助于我们理解压力,尤其是人际压力如何影响儿童和青少年情绪的相关神经机制的实验室模型至关重要,但如果这种理解在青少年的日常生活中缺乏有效性,那么这些模型就存在局限性。目前缺乏相关研究来探讨视觉刺激在测量参与者对该刺激的神经反应时,诱导参与者产生压力的生态效度。如果我们要确定压力事件对个体情绪功能影响背后的神经机制,就需要这种方法。当前的研究进行了一项系统的文献综述,以确定在实验室环境中用于诱导参与者产生压力的视觉任务。确定的最常见任务是为诱导青少年的同伴排斥/排挤而设计的(例如,聊天室和虚拟球游戏)。这些任务通常能有效地在大脑中与社会认知处理传统相关的区域引发神经反应,如扣带回皮质、前额叶皮质、脑岛和纹状体。特别是,扣带回皮质和前额叶皮质与社会信息处理网络相关。文献中几乎完全没有对生态效度以及近似青少年在与父母关系中可能经历的压力的基于亲子关系的视觉刺激进行系统评估。本文强调了当前研究中的趋势和差距,并审视了用作基于实验室的压力源的当前刺激的生态效度,这可用于推动对青少年对刺激的神经反应的进一步研究,以及对任务生态效度的进一步评估。