Suppr超能文献

在标准内镜治疗后,采用内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗巴雷特食管(BE)相关早期肿瘤是可行且安全的。

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related early neoplasia after standard endoscopic management is feasible and safe.

作者信息

Tomizawa Yutaka, Friedland Shai, Hwang Joo Ha

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2020 Apr;8(4):E498-E505. doi: 10.1055/a-0905-2465. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

Abstract

There is little data on the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a salvage treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia after standard endoscopic treatments. A multicenter retrospective analysis on patients who underwent ESD for BE was performed. The primary endpoint was effectiveness of obtaining en-bloc resection in salvage as compared to non-salvage treatments. Median age was 71 (IQR 55 - 79) years. Twelve (37%) of 32 patients underwent salvage ESD. Median resection time was 100 (IQR 60 - 136) minutes. En-bloc resection was achieved in 31 patients (97 %). Complete R0 resection was obtained in 75 % in the salvage group and 80 % in the non-salvage group (  = 1.00). In seven patients (22 %), the pre-ESD diagnosis was upgraded on post-ESD histopathology (1 low-grade dysplasia to high grade dysplasia [HGD], 4 HGD to early esophageal carcinoma (EAC), and 2 intramucosal EAC to invasive EAC). No perforations occurred in either group. Two late adverse events occurred, both in the salvage group (  = 0.133). Delayed bleeding occurred in a patient who had just resumed warfarin and stricture occurred in a patient who had a circumferential resection requiring serial dilation and stent placement. Our cohort study demonstrated that ESD as salvage therapy for BE related neoplasia is feasible and safe, achieving similar high rates of en-bloc resection and complete R0 resection as in treatment-naïve patients. Referral to an expert center performing ESD should be considered for patients with recurrence or progression following endoscopic mucosal resection or ablation therapy.

摘要

关于内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)作为标准内镜治疗后巴雷特食管(BE)相关肿瘤挽救治疗的可行性和安全性的数据较少。对接受BE的ESD治疗的患者进行了多中心回顾性分析。主要终点是与非挽救治疗相比,挽救性整块切除的有效性。中位年龄为71岁(四分位间距55 - 79岁)。32例患者中有12例(37%)接受了挽救性ESD。中位切除时间为100分钟(四分位间距60 - 136分钟)。31例患者(97%)实现了整块切除。挽救组75%的患者获得了R0完全切除,非挽救组为80%(P = 1.00)。7例患者(22%)在ESD术后组织病理学检查中术前诊断得到升级(1例低级别异型增生升级为高级别异型增生[HGD],4例HGD升级为早期食管癌[EAC],2例黏膜内EAC升级为浸润性EAC)。两组均未发生穿孔。发生了2例晚期不良事件,均在挽救组(P = 0.133)。1例刚恢复服用华法林的患者发生了延迟出血,1例进行了环周切除需要连续扩张和置入支架的患者发生了狭窄。我们的队列研究表明,ESD作为BE相关肿瘤的挽救治疗是可行且安全的,整块切除率和R0完全切除率与未接受过治疗的患者相似。对于内镜黏膜切除或消融治疗后复发或进展的患者,应考虑转诊至进行ESD的专家中心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384d/7089792/c67b1ad31369/10-1055-a-0905-2465-i1339ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验