• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; how does it compare to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mohan Babu P, Asokkumar Ravishankar, Khan Shahab R, Kotagiri Rajesh, Sridharan Gurusravanan Kutti, Chandan Saurabh, Ravikumar Naveen Pg, Ponnada Suresh, Jayaraj Mahendran, Adler Douglas G

机构信息

Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona, United States.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2020 Apr;8(4):E558-E565. doi: 10.1055/a-1120-8350. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1055/a-1120-8350
PMID:32258380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7089787/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Outcomes of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty; how does it compare to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜袖状胃成形术的疗效；与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术相比如何？一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Apr;8(4):E558-E565. doi: 10.1055/a-1120-8350. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
Erratum: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.勘误：腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与内镜下袖状胃成形术：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Jan;9(1):C1. doi: 10.1055/a-1379-5528. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Double Fistulo-Jejunostomy for Chronic Gastric Leaks After Converted Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Sleeve Gastrectomy.腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 双瘘管空肠空肠吻合术治疗垂直捆绑胃成形术转换为袖状胃切除术术后慢性胃漏
Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):378-380. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04255-y.
4
Reply to Letter to Editor RE: Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: Technical Aspects and Short-Term Outcomes.致编辑的信的回复：内镜下袖状胃成形术后的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术：技术要点及短期疗效
Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):338. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04209-4.
5
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: Does Only Restriction Counts?内镜下袖状胃成形术后的腹腔镜袖状胃切除术：仅限制起作用吗？
Obes Surg. 2020 Jan;30(1):336-337. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04208-5.
6
[Revision bariatric surgery after endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty].内镜下袖状胃成形术后的减重手术翻修
Cir Cir. 2017 Sep-Oct;85(5):428-431. doi: 10.1016/j.circir.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
7
The pressure is on! Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: toward better patient allocation beyond pygmalionism.压力来袭！内镜袖状胃成形术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术：超越皮格马利翁效应实现更好的患者分配。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):789-791. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.004.
8
Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效比较：基于 18 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
9
Initial experience with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in Poland.波兰内镜下袖状胃成形术的初步经验。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2018 Apr 30;90(2):16-22. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0011.7488.
10
Initial experience with endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in Poland.波兰内镜下袖状胃成形术的初步经验。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2018 Jun 13;90(4):35-40. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0011.8183.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive approaches to obesity: Evaluating the efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastroplasty.肥胖症的微创治疗方法：评估内镜胃成形术的疗效和安全性。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Aug 16;17(8):110335. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i8.110335.
2
Efficacy of Endoscopic Sutured Gastroplasty on Diabetes Mellitus Type 2-A Systematic Review.内镜缝合胃成形术治疗2型糖尿病的疗效——一项系统评价
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Jul;8(4):e70057. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70057.
3
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastroplasty for treatment of obesity: An overview of comparative meta-analyses.内镜胃成形术治疗肥胖症的疗效与安全性：比较性荟萃分析概述
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 May 16;17(5):105158. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i5.105158.
4
Exploring Adiposity and Chronic Kidney Disease: Clinical Implications, Management Strategies, Prognostic Considerations.探讨肥胖与慢性肾脏病：临床意义、管理策略、预后考虑。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Oct 11;60(10):1668. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101668.
5
Fundus-to-Antrum Ratio Measured with Fluoroscopy within One Week after Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Predicts Total Body Weight Loss over Time.内镜下袖状胃成形术后一周内通过荧光透视测量的眼底与胃窦比例可预测随时间推移的总体体重减轻情况。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 4;13(13):3933. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133933.
6
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (LSG): A Comparative Review.内镜袖状胃成形术（ESG）与腹腔镜袖状胃成形术（LSG）：一项比较性综述。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 6;15(7):e41466. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41466. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Deep sedation versus orotracheal intubation for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG): preliminary experience.内镜下袖状胃成形术（ESG）中深度镇静与经口气管插管的比较：初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6513-6518. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10159-x. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
8
Comparable Short-Term Weight Loss and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Patients.内镜袖状胃切除术治疗糖尿病与非糖尿病患者的短期减重效果及安全性比较。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Jun;68(6):2493-2500. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07953-x. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
9
Endoscopic Gastric Sleeve: A Review of Literature.内镜胃袖状切除术：文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Mar 19;15(3):e36353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36353. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
Per-Oral Plication of (Neo)Esophagus: Technical Feasibility and Early Outcomes.经口折叠（新）食管：技术可行性和早期结果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug;27(8):1531-1538. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05205-9. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜袖状胃切除术的疗效和安全性：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;18(5):1043-1053.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.022. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is an effective and safe minimally invasive approach for treatment of obesity: First Indian experience.内镜袖状胃成形术是一种有效且安全的微创治疗肥胖症的方法：印度的首次临床经验。
Dig Endosc. 2020 May;32(4):541-546. doi: 10.1111/den.13508. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Franseen针与叉尖针用于超声内镜引导下实性肿块病变细针穿刺活检的比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Nov-Dec;8(6):382-391. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_27_19.
4
EUS percutaneous management of postoperative pancreatic fluid collection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜超声引导下经皮处理术后胰液积聚：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Sep-Oct;8(5):298-309. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_18_19.
5
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity patients: a meta-analysis.内镜袖状胃成形术治疗肥胖症患者的疗效和安全性：一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1253-1260. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06889-6. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty in the management of overweight and obesity: an international multicenter study.内镜袖状胃成形术治疗超重和肥胖：一项国际多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Nov;90(5):770-780. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Lumen-apposing Metal Stents, Fully Covered Self-expanding Metal Stents, and Biodegradable Stents in the Management of Benign of GI Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腔内置入金属支架、全覆膜自膨式金属支架和生物可降解支架治疗胃肠道良性狭窄：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;53(8):560-573. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001228.
8
Lumen apposing metal stents in drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis, are they any better than plastic stents? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published since the revised Atlanta classification of pancreatic fluid collections.管腔对合金属支架用于胰腺壁内坏死引流，是否比塑料支架更好？对自胰腺液体积聚的修订亚特兰大分类以来发表的研究进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Ultrasound. 2019 Mar-Apr;8(2):82-90. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_7_19.
9
Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers.系统评价与荟萃分析中的异质性：如何解读数字背后的信息
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):902-903. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.036.
10
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus intragastric balloon insertion: efficacy, durability, and safety.内镜袖状胃成形术与胃内球囊置入术：疗效、持久性和安全性。
Endoscopy. 2019 Jun;51(6):532-539. doi: 10.1055/a-0852-3441. Epub 2019 Mar 6.