Suppr超能文献

基于美国南部农村非裔美国人和白人社区成员的文化价值观与偏好,开发并测试一种基于文化的远程姑息治疗咨询服务的可行性:一项由社区开展并为社区服务的项目。

Developing and Testing the Feasibility of a Culturally Based Tele-Palliative Care Consult Based on the Cultural Values and Preferences of Southern, Rural African American and White Community Members: A Program by and for the Community.

作者信息

Elk Ronit, Emanuel Linda, Hauser Joshua, Bakitas Marie, Levkoff Sue

机构信息

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

出版信息

Health Equity. 2020 Mar 26;4(1):52-83. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0120. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Lack of appreciation of cultural differences may compromise care for seriously ill minority patients, yet culturally appropriate models of palliative care (PC) are not currently available in the United States. Rural patients with life-limiting illness are at high risk of not receiving PC. Developing a PC model that considers the cultural preferences of rural African Americans (AAs) and White (W) citizens is crucial. The goal of this study was to develop and determine the feasibility of implementing a culturally based PC tele-consult program for rural Southern AA and W elders with serious illness and their families, and assess its acceptability to patients, their family members, and clinicians. This was a three-phase study conducted in rural Beaufort, South Carolina, from January 2013 to February 2016. We used Community-Based Participatory Research methods, including a Community Advisory Group (CAG) with equal numbers of AA and W members, to guide the study. Phase 1: Cultural values and preferences were determined through ethnic-based focus groups comprising family members (15 W and 16 AA) who had cared for a loved one who died within the past year. We conducted a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts, focused on cultural values and preferences, which was used as the basis for the study protocol. Phase 2: Protocol Development: We created a protocol team of eight CAG members, two researchers, two hospital staff members, and a PC physician. The PC physician explained the standard clinical guidelines for conducting PC consults, and CAG members proposed culturally appropriate programmatic recommendations for their ethnic group for each theme. All recommendations were incorporated into an ethnic-group specific protocol. Phase 3: The culturally based PC protocol was implemented by the PC physician via telehealth in the local hospital. We enrolled patients age ≥65 with a life-limiting illness who had a family caregiver referred by a hospitalist to receive the PC consult. To assess feasibility of program delivery, including its acceptability to patients, caregivers, and hospital staff, using Donebedian's Structure-Process-Outcome model, we measured patient/caregiver satisfaction with the culturally based consult by using an adaptation of FAMCARE-2. Phase 1: Themes between W and AA were (1) equivalent: for example, disrespectful treatment of patients and family by hospital physicians; (2) similar but with variation: for example, although religion and church were important to both groups, and pastors in both ethnic groups helped family face the reality of end of life, AA considered the church unreservedly central to every aspect of life; (3) divergent, for example, AAs strongly believed that hope and miracles were always a possibility and that God was the decider, a theme not present in the W group. Phase 2: We incorporated ethnic group-specific recommendations for the culturally based PC consult into the standard PC consult. Phase 3: We tested feasibility and acceptability of the ethnically specific PC consult on 18 of 32 eligible patients. The telehealth system worked well. PC MD implementation fidelity was 98%. Most patients were non-verbal and could not rate satisfaction with consult; however, caregivers were satisfied or very satisfied. Hospital leadership supported program implementation, but hospitalists only referred 18 out of 28 eligible patients. The first culturally based PC consult program in the United States was developed in partnership with AA and W Southern rural community members. This program was feasible to implement in a small rural hospital but low referral by hospitalists was the major obstacle. Program effectiveness is currently being tested in a randomized clinical trial in three southern, rural states in partnership with hospitalists. This method can serve as a model that can be replicated and adapted to other settings and with other ethnic groups.

摘要

对文化差异缺乏认识可能会影响对重病少数族裔患者的护理,然而目前美国尚无符合文化适宜性的姑息治疗(PC)模式。患有危及生命疾病的农村患者极有可能无法获得姑息治疗。开发一种考虑农村非裔美国人(AAs)和白人(W)文化偏好的姑息治疗模式至关重要。本研究的目的是开发并确定为美国南部农村患有重病的非裔美国人和白人老年人及其家庭实施基于文化的姑息治疗远程咨询项目的可行性,并评估患者、其家庭成员和临床医生对该项目的接受程度。这是一项于2013年1月至2016年2月在南卡罗来纳州博福特农村地区进行的三阶段研究。我们采用基于社区的参与性研究方法,包括一个由数量相等的非裔美国人和白人成员组成的社区咨询小组(CAG)来指导该研究。第一阶段:通过由在过去一年中照顾过去世亲人的家庭成员(15名白人及16名非裔美国人)组成的基于种族的焦点小组确定文化价值观和偏好。我们对焦点小组的文字记录进行了主题分析,重点关注文化价值观和偏好,以此作为研究方案的基础。第二阶段:方案制定:我们组建了一个由8名社区咨询小组成员、2名研究人员、2名医院工作人员和一名姑息治疗医生组成的方案制定团队。姑息治疗医生解释了进行姑息治疗咨询的标准临床指南,社区咨询小组成员针对每个主题为其种族群体提出了符合文化适宜性的项目建议。所有建议都被纳入了一个针对特定种族群体的方案。第三阶段:基于文化的姑息治疗方案由姑息治疗医生通过远程医疗在当地医院实施。我们纳入了年龄≥65岁、患有危及生命疾病且有一名由住院医生转介来接受姑息治疗咨询的家庭照顾者的患者。为了评估项目实施的可行性,包括患者、照顾者和医院工作人员对其的接受程度,我们使用多纳贝迪安的结构 - 过程 -结果模型,通过改编的FAMCARE - 2来衡量患者/照顾者对基于文化的咨询的满意度。第一阶段:白人和非裔美国人之间的主题有:(1)等同:例如,医院医生对患者及其家人的不尊重对待;(2)相似但有差异:例如,尽管宗教和教会对两个群体都很重要,且两个种族群体的牧师都帮助家庭面对生命终结的现实,但非裔美国人认为教会毫无保留地是生活方方面面的核心;(3)不同,例如,非裔美国人坚信希望和奇迹总是有可能的,且上帝是决定者,这是白人组中不存在的主题。第二阶段:我们将针对基于文化的姑息治疗咨询的特定种族群体建议纳入了标准的姑息治疗咨询中。第三阶段:我们在32名符合条件的患者中的18名患者身上测试了特定种族姑息治疗咨询的可行性和可接受性。远程医疗系统运行良好。姑息治疗医生的实施保真度为98%。大多数患者无法言语,无法对咨询满意度进行评分;然而,照顾者表示满意或非常满意。医院领导支持项目实施,但住院医生仅转介了28名符合条件患者中的18名。美国首个基于文化的姑息治疗咨询项目是与南部农村地区的非裔美国人和白人社区成员合作开发的。该项目在一家小型农村医院实施是可行的,但住院医生的低转介率是主要障碍。目前正在与住院医生合作在南部三个农村州进行的一项随机临床试验中测试该项目的有效性。这种方法可以作为一种模式,可被复制并适用于其他环境和其他种族群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36c/7104898/aa83deeb3b53/heq.2019.0120_figure1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验