• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂和血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂对脓毒症患者的影响。

Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker on the patients with sepsis.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(2):371-381. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.262. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

DOI:10.3904/kjim.2019.262
PMID:32264653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7969078/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), reportedly have anti-inflammatory effects. This study assessed the association of prior use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs with sepsis-related clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A population-based observational study was conducted using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data. Among the adult patients hospitalized with new onset of sepsis in 2012, patients who took ARBs or ACE inhibitors at least 30 days prior to hospitalization were analyzed. Generalized linear models and logistic regression were used to examine the relation between the prior use of medication and clinical outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of a total of 27,628 patients who were hospitalized for sepsis, the ACE inhibitor, ARB, and non-user groups included 1,214 (4.4%), 3,951 (14.4%), and 22,463 (82.1%) patients, respectively. As the patients in the ACE inhibitor and ARB groups had several comorbid conditions, higher rates of intensive care unit admission, hemodialysis, and mechanical ventilation were observed. However, after covariate adjustment, the use of ACE inhibitor (odds ratio [OR], 0.752; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.661 to 0.855) or ARB (OR, 0.575; 95% CI, 0.532 to 0.621) was significantly associated with a lower rate of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Pre-hospitalization use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs for sepsis was an independent factor for a lower rate of in-hospital mortality.

摘要

背景/目的:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)据称具有抗炎作用。本研究评估了 ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 的先前使用与脓毒症相关临床结局的关系。

方法

采用健康保险审查和评估服务索赔数据进行基于人群的观察性研究。在 2012 年新发生脓毒症住院的成年患者中,分析了至少在住院前 30 天服用 ARB 或 ACE 抑制剂的患者。使用广义线性模型和逻辑回归检查药物使用与临床结局(如住院死亡率、机械通气和住院时间)之间的关系。

结果

在总共 27628 名因脓毒症住院的患者中,ACE 抑制剂、ARB 和非使用者组分别包括 1214 例(4.4%)、3951 例(14.4%)和 22463 例(82.1%)患者。由于 ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 组的患者有多种合并症,因此观察到更高的重症监护病房入院、血液透析和机械通气率。然而,在调整混杂因素后,ACE 抑制剂(比值比 [OR],0.752;95%置信区间 [CI],0.661 至 0.855)或 ARB(OR,0.575;95% CI,0.532 至 0.621)的使用与住院死亡率降低显著相关。

结论

脓毒症患者住院前使用 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 是降低住院死亡率的独立因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1be/7969078/df0330f2c60b/kjim-2019-262f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1be/7969078/df0330f2c60b/kjim-2019-262f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1be/7969078/df0330f2c60b/kjim-2019-262f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker on the patients with sepsis.血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂和血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂对脓毒症患者的影响。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(2):371-381. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.262. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
Preadmission Antihypertensive Drug Use and Sepsis Outcome: Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs).入院前使用抗高血压药物与脓毒症结局:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的影响。
Shock. 2020 Apr;53(4):407-415. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001382.
3
Population-based study of statins, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on pneumonia-related outcomes.基于人群的他汀类药物、血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与肺炎相关结局的研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;55(11):1466-73. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis733. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
4
Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers and Adverse Outcomes of Influenza and Pneumonia: A Danish Cohort Study.肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂与流感和肺炎不良结局的关系:一项丹麦队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e017297. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017297. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
Antihypertensive Drugs and COVID-19 Risk: A Cohort Study of 2 Million Hypertensive Patients.抗高血压药物与 COVID-19 风险:一项涉及 200 万高血压患者的队列研究。
Hypertension. 2021 Mar 3;77(3):833-842. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16314. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Preadmission use of renin-angiotensin blockers and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a nationwide, population-based study.入院前使用肾素 - 血管紧张素阻滞剂与腹主动脉瘤破裂:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Feb;25(2):141-50. doi: 10.1002/pds.3913. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
7
Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures With Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Hypertensive Community-Dwelling Elderly.社区居住的老年高血压患者中,血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相比,发生骨质疏松性骨折的风险
J Bone Miner Res. 2014 Nov;29(11):2483-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2271.
8
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker use prior to medical intensive care unit admission and in-hospital mortality: propensity score-matched cohort study.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂在进入重症监护病房之前和住院期间死亡率的使用:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Nephrol. 2019 Aug;32(4):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s40620-019-00603-4. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
9
Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂在慢性肾脏病患者的肾脏和心血管结局中的作用:一项随机临床试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 May;67(5):728-41. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
10
Effect of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors on Short-Term Mortality After Sepsis: A Population-Based Cohort Study.血管紧张素-肾素-醛固酮系统抑制剂对脓毒症短期死亡率的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Hypertension. 2020 Feb;75(2):483-491. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13197. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
AT receptors play a role in sepsis-induced vasoplegia by increasing iNOS expression in the perivascular adipose tissue.血管紧张素Ⅱ受体通过增加血管周围脂肪组织中诱导型一氧化氮合酶的表达,在脓毒症诱导的血管麻痹中发挥作用。
Pflugers Arch. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s00424-025-03113-4.
2
Prior Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Risk of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Elderly Patients With Sepsis: A Population-Based Cohort Study.肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂的既往使用与老年重症脓毒症患者肾脏替代治疗风险:一项基于人群的队列研究
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Aug 26;7(9):e1304. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001304. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Preadmission Antihypertensive Drug Use and Sepsis Outcome: Impact of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs).入院前使用抗高血压药物与脓毒症结局:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的影响。
Shock. 2020 Apr;53(4):407-415. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001382.
2
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients with myocardial infarction or heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素受体拮抗剂在心肌梗死或心力衰竭的高血压患者中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2019 May;42(5):641-649. doi: 10.1038/s41440-018-0167-5. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
3
Role of the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System in the Pathogenesis of Sepsis-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review.
肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统在脓毒症诱导的急性肾损伤发病机制中的作用:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 8;12(14):4566. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144566.
4
Risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients: a meta- and network analysis.COVID-19 患者的死亡风险:荟萃分析和网络分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 6;13(1):2138. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29364-8.
5
Angiotensin-(1-7) ameliorates sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy by alleviating inflammatory response and mitochondrial damage through the NF-κB and MAPK pathways.血管紧张素-(1-7) 通过 NF-κB 和 MAPK 通路减轻炎症反应和线粒体损伤,改善脓毒症性心肌病。
J Transl Med. 2023 Jan 2;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03842-5.
6
Endothelial progenitor cells in the host defense response.宿主防御反应中的内皮祖细胞。
Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;241:108315. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108315. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
7
RAS inhibition and sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.RAS 抑制与脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤。
J Crit Care. 2022 Jun;69:153986. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.153986. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
8
Losartan improves intestinal mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil in mice.氯沙坦可改善 5-氟尿嘧啶诱导的小鼠肠道黏膜炎。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 1;11(1):23241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01969-x.
9
Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors on Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Sepsis Survivors.血管紧张素-肾素-醛固酮系统抑制剂对脓毒症幸存者长期主要不良心血管事件的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e022870. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022870. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
10
COVID-19, what could sepsis, severe acute pancreatitis, gender differences, and aging teach us?COVID-19,脓毒症、重症急性胰腺炎、性别差异和老龄化能给我们带来什么启示?
Cytokine. 2021 Dec;148:155628. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155628. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
Effect of Antihypertensive Medications on Sepsis-Related Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
抗高血压药物对脓毒症相关结局的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2019 May;47(5):e386-e393. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003654.
4
Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on All-Cause Mortality and Renal Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes and Albuminuria: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂对糖尿病和蛋白尿患者全因死亡率及肾脏结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43(3):768-779. doi: 10.1159/000489913. Epub 2018 May 22.
5
Outcomes in Patients with Vasodilatory Shock and Renal Replacement Therapy Treated with Intravenous Angiotensin II.血管扩张性休克合并肾脏替代治疗患者静脉内应用血管紧张素 II 的结局。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):949-957. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003092.
6
Evaluation of Vasopressin for Septic Shock in Patients on Chronic Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors.慢性肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂治疗的脓毒性休克患者使用血管加压素的评估
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):e1226-e1232. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002729.
7
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂对心力衰竭患者心血管事件的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Oct 5;17(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0686-z.
8
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality compared to angiotensin receptor blockers: Systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂比血管紧张素受体阻滞剂降低死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Dec;24(18):1914-1924. doi: 10.1177/2047487317728766. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
Effects of Chronic Antihypertensives on Vasopressor Dosing in Septic Shock.慢性抗高血压药物对感染性休克中血管升压药剂量的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Jan;52(1):40-47. doi: 10.1177/1060028017726552. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
10
Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.血管扩张性休克的血管紧张素 II 治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):419-430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704154. Epub 2017 May 21.