Brunkhorst-Kanaan Nathalie, Verdenhalven Moritz, Kittel-Schneider Sarah, Vainieri Isabella, Reif Andreas, Grimm Oliver
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 20;11:216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00216. eCollection 2020.
The differential diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adulthood is complicated by comorbid disorders, but also by the overlapping of main symptoms such as inattentiveness, impulsivity, and hyperactivity with other disorders. Neuropsychological tests like continuous performance tests (CPT) try to solve this dilemma by objectively measurable parameters. We investigated in a cohort of n=114 patients presenting to an ADHD outpatient clinic how well a commercially available CPT test (QbTest) can differentiate between patients with ADHD (n=94) and patients with a disconfirmed ADHD diagnosis (n=20). Both groups showed numerous comorbidities, predominantly depression (27.2% in the ADHD group vs. 45% in the non-ADHD group) and substance-use disorders (18.1% vs. 10%, respectively). Patients with ADHD showed significant higher activity (2.07 ± 1.23) than patients without ADHD (1.34 ± 1.27, dF=112; p=0.019), whereas for the other core parameters, inattention and impulsivity no differences could be found. Reaction time variability has been discussed as a typical marker for inattention in ADHD. Therefore, we investigated how well ex-Gaussian analysis of response time can differentiate between ADHD and other patients, showing, that it does not help to identify patients with ADHD. Even though patients with ADHD showed significantly higher activity, this parameter differed only poorly between patients (accuracy AUC 65% of an ROC-Curve). We conclude that CPTs do not help to identify patients with ADHD in a specialized outpatient clinic. The usability of this test for differentiating between ADHD and other psychiatric disorders is poor and a sophisticated analysis of reaction time did not decisively increase the test accuracy.
成人注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的鉴别诊断因共病而变得复杂,同时其主要症状如注意力不集中、冲动和多动与其他疾病存在重叠也增加了诊断难度。像连续性能测试(CPT)这样的神经心理学测试试图通过客观可测量的参数来解决这一困境。我们对一组前往ADHD门诊就诊的n = 114名患者进行了研究,以探究一种商用CPT测试(QbTest)在区分ADHD患者(n = 94)和ADHD诊断未确诊患者(n = 20)方面的效果如何。两组患者都存在多种共病,主要是抑郁症(ADHD组为27.2%,非ADHD组为45%)和物质使用障碍(分别为18.1%和10%)。ADHD患者的活跃度(2.07±1.23)显著高于非ADHD患者(1.34±1.27,自由度=112;p = 0.019),而在其他核心参数,即注意力不集中和冲动方面未发现差异。反应时间变异性被认为是ADHD中注意力不集中的典型标志。因此,我们研究了反应时间的前高斯分析在区分ADHD患者和其他患者方面的效果,结果表明它无助于识别ADHD患者。尽管ADHD患者的活跃度显著更高,但该参数在患者之间的差异很小(ROC曲线的准确性AUC为65%)。我们得出结论,在专门的门诊中,CPT测试无助于识别ADHD患者。该测试在区分ADHD和其他精神疾病方面的可用性较差,对反应时间的复杂分析并未决定性地提高测试准确性。