Agnew-Blais Jessica C, Polanczyk Guilherme V, Danese Andrea, Wertz Jasmin, Moffitt Terrie E, Arseneault Louise
Medical Research Council Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 1;73(7):713-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0465.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is now recognized to occur in adulthood and is associated with a range of negative outcomes. However, less is known about the prospective course of ADHD into adulthood, the risk factors for its persistence, and the possibility of its emergence in young adulthood in nonclinical populations.
To investigate childhood risk factors and young adult functioning of individuals with persistent, remitted, and late-onset young adult ADHD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study sample was the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a nationally representative birth cohort of 2232 twins born in England and Wales from January 1, 1994, to December 4, 1995. Evaluation of childhood ADHD (ages 5, 7, 10, and 12 years) included prenatal and perinatal factors, clinical characteristics, and aspects of the family environment. Among participants aged 18 years, ADHD symptoms and associated impairment, overall functioning, and other mental health disorders were examined. Data analysis was conducted from February 19 to September 10, 2015.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder according to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria in childhood and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria in young adulthood.
Of 2232 participants in the E-Risk Study, 2040 were included in the present analysis. In total, 247 individuals met diagnostic criteria for childhood ADHD; of these, 54 (21.9%) also met diagnostic criteria for the disorder at age 18 years. Persistence was associated with more symptoms (odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04-1.19]) and lower IQ (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.95-1.00]). At age 18 years, individuals with persistent ADHD had more functional impairment (school/work: OR, 3.30 [95% CI, 2.18-5.00], home/with friends: OR, 6.26 [95% CI, 3.07-12.76]), generalized anxiety disorder (OR, 5.19 [95% CI, 2.01-13.38]), conduct disorder (OR, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.03-3.99]), and marijuana dependence (OR, 2.88 [95% CI, 1.07-7.71]) compared with those whose ADHD remitted. Among 166 individuals with adult ADHD, 112 (67.5%) did not meet criteria for ADHD at any assessment in childhood. Results from logistic regressions indicated that individuals with late-onset ADHD showed fewer externalizing problems (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.96]) and higher IQ (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.07]) in childhood compared with the persistent group. However, at age 18 years, those with late-onset ADHD demonstrated comparable ADHD symptoms and impairment as well as similarly elevated rates of mental health disorders.
We identified heterogeneity in the DSM-5 young adult ADHD population such that this group consisted of a large, late-onset ADHD group with no childhood diagnosis, and a smaller group with persistent ADHD. The extent to which childhood-onset and late-onset adult ADHD may reflect different causes has implications for genetic studies and treatment of ADHD.
注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)目前已被认可会在成年期出现,并与一系列负面后果相关。然而,对于ADHD在成年期的前瞻性病程、其持续存在的风险因素以及在非临床人群中成年早期出现该疾病的可能性,我们所知甚少。
研究持续性、缓解性以及成年期起病的成年ADHD患者童年期的风险因素及成年早期的功能状况。
设计、设置和参与者:研究样本为环境风险(E-Risk)纵向双生子研究,这是一个具有全国代表性的出生队列,包含1994年1月1日至1995年12月4日在英格兰和威尔士出生的2232对双胞胎。对童年期ADHD(5岁、7岁、10岁和12岁)的评估包括产前和围产期因素、临床特征以及家庭环境方面。在18岁的参与者中,检查了ADHD症状及相关损害、整体功能以及其他心理健康障碍。数据分析于2015年2月19日至9月10日进行。
根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断标准确定童年期的注意力缺陷多动障碍,以及根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)诊断标准确定成年早期的注意力缺陷多动障碍。
在E-Risk研究的2232名参与者中,2040名被纳入本分析。总共有247人符合童年期ADHD的诊断标准;其中,54人(21.9%)在18岁时也符合该疾病的诊断标准。疾病持续存在与更多症状(优势比[OR],1.11[95%置信区间(CI),1.04 - 1.19])以及较低智商(OR,0.98[95% CI,0.95 - 1.00])相关。在18岁时,与ADHD缓解的个体相比,持续性ADHD患者有更多功能损害(学校/工作方面:OR,3.30[95% CI,2.18 - 5.00],家庭/与朋友相处方面:OR,6.26[95% CI,3.07 - 12.76])、广泛性焦虑障碍(OR,5.19[95% CI,2.01 - 13.38])、品行障碍(OR,2.03[95% CI,1.03 - 3.99])以及大麻依赖(OR,2.88[95% CI,1.07 - 7.71])。在166名成年ADHD患者中,112人(67.5%)在童年期的任何评估中均未符合ADHD标准。逻辑回归结果表明,与持续性ADHD组相比,成年期起病的ADHD患者在童年期表现出较少的外化问题(OR,0.93[95% CI,0.91 - 0.96])和较高的智商(OR,1.04[95% CI,1.02 - 1.07])。然而,在18岁时,成年期起病的ADHD患者表现出与持续性ADHD患者相当的ADHD症状和损害,以及同样高的心理健康障碍发生率。
我们在DSM-5成年ADHD人群中发现了异质性,即该群体由一个未在童年期诊断出的大型成年期起病ADHD组和一个较小的持续性ADHD组组成。儿童期起病和成年期起病的成年ADHD在多大程度上可能反映不同病因,这对ADHD的遗传学研究和治疗具有重要意义。