• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查布基纳法索、加纳、莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚自然资源开采项目对健康的影响:一项混合方法研究方案

Investigating Health Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction Projects in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Farnham Andrea, Cossa Hermínio, Dietler Dominik, Engebretsen Rebecca, Leuenberger Andrea, Lyatuu Isaac, Nimako Belinda, Zabre Hyacinthe R, Brugger Fritz, Winkler Mirko S

机构信息

Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 8;9(4):e17138. doi: 10.2196/17138.

DOI:10.2196/17138
PMID:32266876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7177430/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Natural resource extraction projects offer both opportunities and risks for sustainable development and health in host communities. Often, however, the health of the community suffers. Health impact assessment (HIA) can mitigate the risks and promote the benefits of development but is not routinely done in the developing regions that could benefit the most.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to investigate health and health determinants in regions affected by extractive industries in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania. The evidence generated in our study will inform a policy dialogue on how HIA can be promoted as a regulatory approach as part of the larger research initiative called the HIA4SD (Health impact assessment for sustainable development) project.

METHODS

The study is a concurrent triangulation, mixed methods, multi-stage, multi-focus project that specifically addresses the topics of governance and policy, social determinants of health, health economics, health systems, maternal and child health, morbidity and mortality, and environmental determinants, as well as the associated health outcomes in natural resource extraction project settings across four countries. To investigate each of these health topics, the project will (1) use existing population-level databases to quantify incidence of disease and other health outcomes and determinants over time using time series analysis; (2) conduct two quantitative surveys on mortality and cost of disease in producer regions; and (3) collect primary qualitative data using focus groups and key informant interviews describing community perceptions of the impacts of extraction projects on health and partnership arrangements between the projects and local and national governance. Differences in health outcomes and health determinants between districts with and without an extraction project will be analyzed using matched geographical analyses in quasi-Poisson regression models and binomial regression models. Costs to the health system and to the households from diseases found to be associated with projects in each country will be estimated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Fieldwork for the study began in February 2019 and concluded in February 2020. At the time of submission, qualitative data collection had been completed in all four study countries. In Burkina Faso, 36 focus group discussions and 74 key informant interviews were conducted in three sites. In Ghana, 34 focus group discussions and 64 key informant interviews were conducted in three sites. In Mozambique, 75 focus group discussions and 103 key informant interviews were conducted in four sites. In Tanzania, 36 focus group discussions and 84 key informant interviews were conducted in three sites. Quantitative data extraction and collection is ongoing in all four study countries. Ethical approval for the study was received in all four study countries prior to beginning the fieldwork. Data analyses are underway and results are expected to be published in 2020 and 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Disentangling the complex interactions of resource extraction projects with their host communities requires an integrative approach drawing on many methodologies under the HIA umbrella. By using complementary data sources to address the question of population health in project areas from several angles, bias and missing data will be reduced, generating high-quality evidence to aid countries in moving toward sustainable development.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17138.

摘要

背景

自然资源开采项目给所在社区的可持续发展和健康带来了机遇与风险。然而,社区健康往往会受到损害。健康影响评估(HIA)能够降低风险并促进发展带来的益处,但在最能从中受益的发展中地区却未得到常规开展。

目的

我们的研究旨在调查布基纳法索、加纳、莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚受采掘业影响地区的健康状况及健康决定因素。我们研究中产生的证据将为关于如何将HIA作为一种监管方法加以推广的政策对话提供信息,这是名为HIA4SD(可持续发展健康影响评估)项目的更大规模研究计划的一部分。

方法

该研究是一个同步三角测量、混合方法、多阶段、多重点的项目,专门涉及治理与政策、健康的社会决定因素、健康经济学、卫生系统、母婴健康、发病率和死亡率、环境决定因素以及四个国家自然资源开采项目背景下的相关健康结果等主题。为调查这些健康主题中的每一个,该项目将:(1)使用现有的人口层面数据库,通过时间序列分析来量化疾病及其他健康结果和决定因素随时间的发生率;(2)对生产地区的死亡率和疾病成本进行两项定量调查;(3)通过焦点小组和关键信息人访谈收集主要定性数据,描述社区对开采项目对健康影响的看法以及项目与地方和国家治理之间的伙伴关系安排。将使用准泊松回归模型和二项回归模型中的匹配地理分析方法,分析有开采项目地区和无开采项目地区之间健康结果和健康决定因素的差异。将对每个国家中发现与项目相关疾病给卫生系统和家庭带来的成本进行回顾性估计。

结果

该研究的实地调查于2019年2月开始,并于2020年2月结束。在提交本文时,所有四个研究国家的定性数据收集工作均已完成。在布基纳法索,在三个地点进行了36次焦点小组讨论和74次关键信息人访谈。在加纳,在三个地点进行了34次焦点小组讨论和64次关键信息人访谈。在莫桑比克,在四个地点进行了75次焦点小组讨论和103次关键信息人访谈。在坦桑尼亚,在三个地点进行了36次焦点小组讨论和84次关键信息人访谈。所有四个研究国家的定量数据提取和收集工作正在进行中。在开始实地调查之前,所有四个研究国家均已获得该研究的伦理批准。数据分析正在进行中,预计结果将于2020年和2021年发表。

结论

理清资源开采项目与其所在社区之间复杂的相互作用需要一种综合方法,借鉴HIA框架下的多种方法。通过使用互补数据源从多个角度解决项目地区的人群健康问题,将减少偏差和缺失数据,从而生成高质量证据,帮助各国朝着可持续发展迈进。

国际注册报告识别码(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/17138

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72c9/7177430/ae7876cd2a64/resprot_v9i4e17138_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72c9/7177430/b1d1fc0d8642/resprot_v9i4e17138_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72c9/7177430/ae7876cd2a64/resprot_v9i4e17138_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72c9/7177430/b1d1fc0d8642/resprot_v9i4e17138_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72c9/7177430/ae7876cd2a64/resprot_v9i4e17138_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating Health Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction Projects in Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique, and Tanzania: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.调查布基纳法索、加纳、莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚自然资源开采项目对健康的影响:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 8;9(4):e17138. doi: 10.2196/17138.
2
: Health Inequity in Communities Surrounding Industrial Mining Sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, and Tanzania.矿业周边社区的健康不平等:布基纳法索、莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚的案例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111015.
3
Health impacts of industrial mining on surrounding communities: Local perspectives from three sub-Saharan African countries.工业采矿对周边社区的健康影响:来自三个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的地方观点。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252433. eCollection 2021.
4
Tuberculosis结核病
5
Exploring the Impact of Mining on Community Health and Health Service Delivery: Perceptions of Key Informants Involved in Gold Mining Communities in Burkina Faso.探讨采矿对社区健康和卫生服务提供的影响:布基纳法索金矿社区中参与关键信息者的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 12;20(24):7167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247167.
6
Measuring health systems strength and its impact: experiences from the African Health Initiative.衡量卫生系统的实力及其影响:非洲卫生倡议的经验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 21;17(Suppl 3):827. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2658-5.
7
Nurse-Led Education and Engagement for Diabetes Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.撒哈拉以南非洲地区护士主导的糖尿病护理教育与参与:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jun 3;9(6):e15408. doi: 10.2196/15408.
8
Using Information and Communication Technologies to Engage Citizens in Health System Governance in Burkina Faso: Protocol for Action Research.利用信息通信技术促使布基纳法索公民参与卫生系统治理:行动研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(11):e28780. doi: 10.2196/28780.
9
Mentorship and coaching to support strengthening healthcare systems: lessons learned across the five Population Health Implementation and Training partnership projects in sub-Saharan Africa.支持加强卫生保健系统的指导与辅导:撒哈拉以南非洲五个“人口健康实施与培训”伙伴关系项目的经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 21;17(Suppl 3):831. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2656-7.
10
Tackling the hard problems: implementation experience and lessons learned in newborn health from the African Health Initiative.应对难题:非洲卫生倡议在新生儿健康方面的实施经验与教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 21;17(Suppl 3):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2659-4.

引用本文的文献

1
'Knowing how the machine works': a novel framework for engaging with the political determinants of health.“了解机器如何运作”:一个应对健康问题政治决定因素的新框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 21;10(8):e019640. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019640.
2
Understanding stakeholders' perceptions of the impact of extractive industries on adolescent health and well-being in Mozambique: a qualitative study.了解利益相关者对莫桑比克采矿业对青少年健康和福祉影响的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):e088207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088207.
3
Exploring prioritization of wellbeing and health impacts for mining communities during the mining life cycle within the sub-Saharan Africa context: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Using district health information to monitor sustainable development.利用地区卫生信息监测可持续发展。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Jan 1;98(1):69-71. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.239970. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
2
Assessing health impacts within environmental impact assessments: an opportunity for public health globally which must not remain missed.在环境影响评估中评估健康影响:这是一个全球公共卫生不容错过的机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jan 20;12(1):1044-9. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120101044.
3
Changing patterns of health in communities impacted by a bioenergy project in northern Sierra Leone.
探索撒哈拉以南非洲地区矿业生命周期内矿业社区福祉与健康影响的优先次序:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):1432. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22691-7.
4
Exploring methods to assess environmental health inequalities in health impact assessments of local interventions: a systematic review within the JA PreventNCD project.探索在地方干预措施的健康影响评估中评估环境健康不平等的方法:JA预防非传染性疾病项目内的系统评价
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 19;13:1546394. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1546394. eCollection 2025.
5
Prospects and Perspectives of Health Impact Assessment: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature From June 2007 to January 2023.健康影响评估的前景与展望:对2007年6月至2023年1月同行评审文献的系统综述
Public Health Rev. 2024 Apr 16;45:1606649. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606649. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploring the Impact of Mining on Community Health and Health Service Delivery: Perceptions of Key Informants Involved in Gold Mining Communities in Burkina Faso.探讨采矿对社区健康和卫生服务提供的影响:布基纳法索金矿社区中参与关键信息者的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 12;20(24):7167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247167.
7
A roadmap for using DHIS2 data to track progress in key health indicators in the Global South: experience from sub-saharan Africa.利用 DHIS2 数据追踪全球南方关键卫生指标进展的路线图:来自撒哈拉以南非洲的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 31;23(1):1030. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15979-z.
8
Gender in public health research: Reflections on design and process across four research projects in low-and middle-income countries.公共卫生研究中的性别问题:对低收入和中等收入国家四个研究项目的设计与过程的思考
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 12;3(4):e0000808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000808. eCollection 2023.
9
Industrial mining and HIV risk: evidence from 39 mine openings across 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.工业采矿与艾滋病毒风险:来自撒哈拉以南非洲 16 个国家 39 个矿区的证据。
AIDS. 2022 Sep 1;36(11):1573-1581. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003294. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
10
: Health Inequity in Communities Surrounding Industrial Mining Sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, and Tanzania.矿业周边社区的健康不平等:布基纳法索、莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚的案例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111015.
受塞拉利昂北部一个生物能源项目影响的社区的健康模式变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Dec 12;11(12):12997-3016. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212997. Print 2014 Dec.
4
Biomonitoring of arsenic, cadmium, lead, manganese and mercury in urine and hair of children living near mining and industrial areas.对生活在矿区和工业区附近儿童尿液和头发中砷、镉、铅、锰和汞的生物监测。
Chemosphere. 2015 Apr;124:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Lead poisoning in children from townships in the vicinity of a lead-zinc mine in Kabwe, Zambia.赞比亚卡布韦附近一个铅锌矿附近乡镇儿童的铅中毒。
Chemosphere. 2015 Jan;119:941-947. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
6
Mercury exposure and health impacts among individuals in the artisanal and small-scale gold mining community: a comprehensive review.个体手工和小规模金矿开采社区中的汞暴露及其对健康的影响:一项综合综述
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Jul;122(7):667-72. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307864. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
7
Environmental impact assessment: National approaches and international needs.环境影响评价:国家方法与国际需求。
Environ Monit Assess. 1983 Jun;3(2):133-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00398843.
8
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
9
Untapped potential of health impact assessment.卫生影响评估的未开发潜力。
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Apr 1;91(4):298-305. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.112318. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
10
Impact of the mining industry on the mental health of landholders and rural communities in southwest Queensland.采矿业对昆士兰西南部土地所有者及农村社区心理健康的影响。
Australas Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;21(1):32-7. doi: 10.1177/1039856212460287.