• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of personality functioning and pathological traits on mental wellbeing of older patients with personality disorders.人格功能和病理特征对老年人格障碍患者心理健康的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03857-8.
2
An Empirical Evaluation of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders in Later Life.晚年人格障碍替代模型的实证评估。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2021 Oct;93(3):904-926. doi: 10.1177/0091415020980762. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits.自恋观念与 DSM-5 病理性人格特质。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):339-52. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486692. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
5
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
Relating DSM-5 section III personality traits to section II personality disorder diagnoses.将《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分的人格特质与第二部分的人格障碍诊断相关联。
Psychol Med. 2016 Feb;46(3):647-55. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002226. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
7
Schema therapy conceptualization of personality functioning and traits in ICD-11 and DSM-5.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 中人格功能和特质的图式治疗概念化》
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;32(1):38-49. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000464.
8
Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ.老年人适应不良人格特质的层次结构:PID-5 和 DAPP-BQ 的联合因子分析。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Apr;28(2):198-211. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Discriminant validity of the alternative model of personality disorder.人格障碍替代模型的判别效度。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Dec;32(12):1158-1171. doi: 10.1037/pas0000955. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
Continuity between DSM-5 Categorical Criteria and Traits Criteria for Borderline Personality Disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中边缘型人格障碍的分类标准与特质标准之间的连续性。
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;61(8):489-94. doi: 10.1177/0706743716640756. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Spanish version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0): Psychometric evaluation in adolescents who have suffered from parental abuse and neglect and a community sample.人格功能水平量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)的西班牙语版本:对遭受父母虐待和忽视的青少年及社区样本的心理测量评估。
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2024 Dec 21;12(1):20240012. doi: 10.2478/sjcapp-2024-0012. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Severity in the ICD-11 personality disorder model: Evaluation in a Spanish mixed sample.国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍模型中的严重程度:西班牙混合样本评估。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;13:1015489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1015489. eCollection 2022.
3
The interplay of Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders, mentalization and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic.人格障碍替代模型的A标准、心理化与新冠疫情期间心理韧性之间的相互作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:928540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928540. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of borderline personality disorder traits on the association between age and health-related quality of life: A cohort study in the general population.边缘型人格特质对年龄与健康相关生活质量之间关联的影响:一项普通人群的队列研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 26;64(1):e33. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.27.
2
Age bias in the criteria for antisocial personality disorder.反社会型人格障碍标准中的年龄偏见。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 May;137:444-451. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Incremental validity of the ICD-11 personality disorder model for explaining psychological distress.国际疾病分类第11版人格障碍模型在解释心理困扰方面的增量效度。
Personal Disord. 2022 Mar;13(2):97-107. doi: 10.1037/per0000489. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
4
Personality disorder prevalence and correlates in a whole of nation dataset.全国性数据集中心理障碍的患病率及其相关因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Apr;56(4):679-685. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01876-y. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
Severity Indices of Personality Problems-Short Form in Old-Age Psychiatry: Reliability and Validity.老年精神病学中人格问题严重程度指数-短式:信度和效度。
J Pers Assess. 2021 Mar-Apr;103(2):174-182. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1743710. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Recognition of personality disorder and anxiety disorder comorbidity in patients treated for depression in secondary psychiatric care.识别二级精神保健治疗抑郁症患者中的人格障碍和焦虑障碍共病。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 2;15(1):e0227364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227364. eCollection 2020.
7
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
8
Group schema-focused therapy enriched with psychomotor therapy versus treatment as usual for older adults with cluster B and/or C personality disorders: a randomized trial.群组焦点治疗辅以精神运动疗法对比常规治疗对 B 群和/或 C 群人格障碍老年患者的随机试验
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 15;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-2004-4.
9
The Development of the ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders: An Amalgam of Science, Pragmatism, and Politics.《ICD-11 人格障碍分类的发展:科学、实用主义与政治的融合》
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:481-502. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
A framework for treating DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorder features.DSM-5 人格障碍特征替代模型的治疗框架。
Personal Ment Health. 2018 May;12(2):107-125. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1414. Epub 2018 Apr 15.

人格功能和病理特征对老年人格障碍患者心理健康的影响。

Impact of personality functioning and pathological traits on mental wellbeing of older patients with personality disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Clinical & Life Span Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03857-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-022-03857-8
PMID:35331179
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8944148/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although personality disorders are common and consequential, they are largely ignored in geriatric mental healthcare. We examined the relative contributions of different aspects of personality disorders and comorbid mental disorders to the impairment of mental wellbeing in older adults.

METHODS

Baseline data were used of 138 patients who participated in a randomized controlled trial on schema therapy for geriatric mental health outpatients with a full or subthreshold cluster B or C personality disorder. Personality was assessed according to both the categorical and dimensional model of DSM-5. Aspects of mental wellbeing assessed were; psychological distress, positive mental health, subjective health, and life satisfaction. The current study uses baseline data of the RCT to examine the associations between different aspects of personality pathology and mental wellbeing by multivariate regression analysis, controlling for age, sex, level of education, and number of chronic somatic illnesses.

RESULTS

The vast majority of patients (79.0%) had one or more mental disorders in addition to personality disorder. Personality pathology was responsible for the core of the mental health burden experienced by patients, and negated the influence of co-occurring mental disorders when entered subsequently in multivariate analysis. Personality dimensions proved to be highly predictive of mental wellbeing, and this contrasted with absence of influence of personality disorder diagnosis. Although the personality functioning dimensions - and in particular Identity integration (large effect size with partial eta-squared = 0.36) - were the primary predictors of mental wellbeing, personality trait dimensions added significant predictive value to that (Disinhibition 0.25 and Negative affect 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Personality disorders seriously affect the mental wellbeing of patients, and this overshadows the impact of comorbid mental disorders. In particular personality functioning and pathological traits of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) of DSM-5 contribute to this impact on mental wellbeing. Alertness for and treatment of personality disorders in geriatric mental healthcare seems warranted.

摘要

背景

尽管人格障碍很常见且后果严重,但在老年精神保健中,它们在很大程度上被忽视了。我们研究了人格障碍的不同方面以及合并的精神障碍对老年人心理健康受损的相对贡献。

方法

本研究使用了 138 名参加针对老年精神卫生门诊患者的图式治疗的随机对照试验的基线数据,这些患者患有全或亚阈值 B 组或 C 组人格障碍。人格根据 DSM-5 的分类和维度模型进行评估。评估的心理健康方面包括:心理困扰、积极的心理健康、主观健康和生活满意度。本研究使用 RCT 的基线数据,通过多元回归分析,控制年龄、性别、教育程度和慢性躯体疾病数量,来检查不同人格病理方面与心理健康之间的关系。

结果

绝大多数患者(79.0%)除了人格障碍外,还有一种或多种精神障碍。人格病理是患者所经历的心理健康负担的核心,当随后在多元分析中纳入共病精神障碍时,它否定了其影响。人格维度被证明对心理健康有高度预测性,这与人格障碍诊断的缺乏影响形成对比。尽管人格功能维度——特别是身份整合(具有部分 eta 平方的大效应量=0.36)——是心理健康的主要预测因素,但人格特质维度也增加了显著的预测价值(抑制 0.25 和负性情绪 0.24)。

结论

人格障碍严重影响患者的心理健康,这超过了共病精神障碍的影响。特别是 DSM-5 的替代人格障碍模型(AMPD)的人格功能和病理特征对此心理健康的影响有贡献。在老年精神保健中,对人格障碍的警惕和治疗似乎是必要的。