• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么、什么以及欧洲医疗机构管理者如何使用绩效数据?对欧洲医院和医疗保健联合会成员的调查和研讨会的结果。

Why, what and how do European healthcare managers use performance data? Results of a survey and workshop among members of the European Hospital and Healthcare Federation.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The European Hospital and Healthcare Federation, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0231345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231345. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0231345
PMID:32267883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7141666/
Abstract

Objective of this study was to better understand the use of performance data for evidence-based decision-making by managers in hospitals and other healthcare organisations in Europe in 2019. In order to explore why, what and how performance data is collected, reported and used, we conducted a cross-sectional study based on a self-reported online questionnaire and a follow-up interactive workshop. Our study population were participants of a pan-European professional Exchange Programme and their hosts (n = 125), mostly mid-level hospital managers. We found that a substantial amount of performance data is collected and reported, but could be utilised better for decision-making purposes. Motivation to collect and report performance data is equally internal and external, for improvement as well as for accountability purposes. Benchmarking between organisations is recognised as being important but is still underused. A plethora of different data sources are used, but more should be done on conceptualising, collecting, reporting and using patient-reported data. Managers working for privately owned organisations reported greater use of performance data than those working for public ones. Strategic levels of management use performance data more for justifying their decisions, while managers on operational and clinical levels use it more for day-to-day decision-making. Our study showed that, despite the substantial and increasing use of performance data for evidence-based management, there is room and need to further explore and expand its role in strategic decision-making and supporting a shift in healthcare from organisational accountability towards the model of learning organisations.

摘要

本研究的目的是更好地了解欧洲医院和其他医疗机构的管理者在 2019 年如何利用绩效数据进行循证决策。为了探索绩效数据为何、如何以及如何被收集、报告和使用,我们进行了一项基于自我报告的在线问卷调查和后续互动研讨会的横断面研究。我们的研究对象是泛欧专业交流计划的参与者及其接待者(n=125),主要是中层医院管理者。我们发现,大量的绩效数据被收集和报告,但可以更好地用于决策目的。收集和报告绩效数据的动机既有内部的,也有外部的,既可以用于改进,也可以用于问责。组织之间的基准比较被认为很重要,但仍未得到充分利用。使用了大量不同的数据来源,但在概念化、收集、报告和使用患者报告数据方面应该做得更多。为私营组织工作的管理者比为公共组织工作的管理者更多地使用绩效数据。管理层的战略层面更多地使用绩效数据来为其决策辩护,而运营和临床层面的管理者则更多地将其用于日常决策。我们的研究表明,尽管大量且不断增加的绩效数据被用于循证管理,但仍有空间和需要进一步探索和扩大其在战略决策中的作用,并支持医疗保健从组织问责制向学习型组织模式转变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0a/7141666/d57e7b133501/pone.0231345.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0a/7141666/0b77d126905c/pone.0231345.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0a/7141666/99a284540b15/pone.0231345.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0a/7141666/d57e7b133501/pone.0231345.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0a/7141666/0b77d126905c/pone.0231345.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0a/7141666/99a284540b15/pone.0231345.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa0a/7141666/d57e7b133501/pone.0231345.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Why, what and how do European healthcare managers use performance data? Results of a survey and workshop among members of the European Hospital and Healthcare Federation.为什么、什么以及欧洲医疗机构管理者如何使用绩效数据?对欧洲医院和医疗保健联合会成员的调查和研讨会的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 8;15(4):e0231345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231345. eCollection 2020.
2
Healthcare managers' experiences of technostress and the actions they take to handle it - a critical incident analysis.医疗保健经理的技术压力体验以及他们应对技术压力所采取的措施——一次关键事件分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01261-4.
3
Routine health data use for decision making and its associated factors among primary healthcare managers in dodoma region.多哥地区初级卫生保健管理人员常规卫生数据用于决策及其相关因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 3;24(1):1168. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11658-w.
4
Use of Performance Data by Mid-Level Hospital Managers in Ontario: Results of a Province-Wide Survey and a Comparison with Hospital Managers in Europe.安大略省中级医院管理者对绩效数据的使用:全省范围调查的结果及与欧洲医院管理者的比较。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct;18(2):44-60. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26971.
5
Managing hospital doctors and their practice: what can we learn about human resource management from non-healthcare organisations?管理医院医生及其执业行为:我们能从非医疗组织中学到哪些关于人力资源管理的知识?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 21;14:566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0566-5.
6
Leadership and management training as a catalyst to health system strengthening in low-income settings: Evidence from implementation of the Zambia Management and Leadership course for district health managers in Zambia.领导力与管理培训作为低收入环境下加强卫生系统的催化剂:来自赞比亚地区卫生管理人员赞比亚管理与领导力课程实施情况的证据
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 25;12(7):e0174536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174536. eCollection 2017.
7
Healthcare professionals' perspective on managing the healthcare system in Croatia: a cross-sectional study.医疗专业人员对克罗地亚医疗体系管理的看法:一项横断面研究。
Croat Med J. 2024 Aug 31;65(4):339-348. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.339.
8
A cross-sectional survey of supports for evidence-informed decision-making in healthcare organisations: a research protocol.医疗保健机构中支持循证决策的横断面调查:一项研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 9;9:146. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0146-4.
9
Data-Driven Collaboration between Hospitals and Other Healthcare Organisations in Europe During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study among Mid-Level Hospital Managers.新冠疫情期间欧洲医院与其他医疗保健组织之间的数据驱动型合作:一项针对中级医院管理人员的解释性序列混合方法研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jun 16;23(2):28. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6990. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
10
Measuring integrated care.衡量整合式照护。
Dan Med Bull. 2011 Feb;58(2):B4245.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitating Utilization of Evidence-Informed Management by Nurse Managers in Healthcare Facilities: An Integrative Literature Review.促进医疗机构护士长对循证管理的应用:一项综合文献综述
J Nurs Manag. 2024 May 21;2024:6649401. doi: 10.1155/2024/6649401. eCollection 2024.
2
Data-Driven Collaboration between Hospitals and Other Healthcare Organisations in Europe During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study among Mid-Level Hospital Managers.新冠疫情期间欧洲医院与其他医疗保健组织之间的数据驱动型合作:一项针对中级医院管理人员的解释性序列混合方法研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Jun 16;23(2):28. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6990. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing middle managers' commitment to innovation implementation: An agenda for research.增强中层管理人员对创新实施的投入:一项研究议程。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Apr;24(2):71-72. doi: 10.1177/1355819619826164. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
2
Factors influencing middle managers' commitment to the implementation of innovations in cancer care.影响癌症护理创新实施的中层管理者承诺的因素。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019 Apr;24(2):91-99. doi: 10.1177/1355819618804842. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
3
Changing how we think about healthcare improvement.
The impact of COVID-19 on electronic repeat dispensing (eRD) in general practice.
2019年冠状病毒病对全科医疗中电子重复配药的影响。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 May 17;16(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00566-9.
4
Determining the key performance indicators of human resource management of military hospital managers; a TOPSIS study.确定军医管理人员人力资源管理的关键绩效指标;TOPSIS 研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Feb 14;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02007-7.
5
Use of Performance Data by Mid-Level Hospital Managers in Ontario: Results of a Province-Wide Survey and a Comparison with Hospital Managers in Europe.安大略省中级医院管理者对绩效数据的使用:全省范围调查的结果及与欧洲医院管理者的比较。
Healthc Policy. 2022 Oct;18(2):44-60. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2022.26971.
6
The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review.标杆管理在医疗质量改进中的作用。系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8.
改变我们对医疗保健改善的看法。
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k2014. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2014.
4
Understanding middle managers' influence in implementing patient safety culture.理解中层管理人员在实施患者安全文化方面的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2533-4.
5
Are performance indicators used for hospital quality management: a qualitative interview study amongst health professionals and quality managers in The Netherlands.绩效指标是否用于医院质量管理:荷兰卫生专业人员和质量管理人员的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1826-3.
6
Testing the construct validity of hospital care quality indicators: a case study on hip replacement.检验医院护理质量指标的结构效度:以髋关节置换术为例的案例研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 5;16(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1778-7.
7
The involvement of medical doctors in hospital governance and implications for quality management: a quick scan in 19 and an in depth study in 7 OECD countries.医生参与医院治理及其对质量管理的影响:对19个国家的快速审视及对7个经合组织国家的深入研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 24;16 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):160. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1396-4.
8
Ernest Codman and the end result system: a pioneer of health outcomes revisited.欧内斯特·科德曼与最终结果系统:重访健康结果的先驱
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Oct;21(4):279-81. doi: 10.1177/1355819616648984. Epub 2016 May 17.
9
Validity of the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Hospital-acquired Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医疗保健研究与质量机构患者安全指标及医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心医院获得性疾病的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Care. 2016 Dec;54(12):1105-1111. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000550.
10
Era 3 for Medicine and Health Care.医学与医疗保健的时代3。
JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1329-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1509.