Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(23):1405-1415. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101447. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Cycling has well-established positive relationships with health. Evidence suggests that large-scale infrastructure and built-environment initiatives to promote cycling are likely to be necessary but not sufficient to maximise cycling participation. Smaller-scale initiatives that can be implemented by organisations (eg, employers) and groups (eg, community groups) are therefore also important, but the full range of feasible activities to promote cycling is not known. We aimed to scope the literature and map organisational, social and individual level activities to increase cycling.
Design: Scoping review following an established five-stage process.Eligibility criteria: Studies or publicly available reports describing cycling promotion initiatives deemed feasible for organisations or groups to implement.Sources of evidence and selection: (i) online databases (Ovid (Medline), Ovid (Embase), SportDISCUS (Ebscohost), ProQuest, Web of Science), (ii) existing systematic reviews, (iii) expert stakeholder consultation.
We extracted data from 129 studies and reports, from 20 different countries, identifying 145 cycling promotion initiatives. From these initiatives we identified 484 actions within 93 action types within 33 action categories under the nine intervention functions described by Michie . Environmental restructuring (micro-level), enablement, education and persuasion were the functions with the most action types, while coercion, modelling and restriction had the fewest action types.
This is the first comprehensive map to summarise the broad range of action types feasible for implementation within organisation/group-based cycling promotion initiatives. The map will be a critical tool for communities, employers, practitioners and researchers in designing interventions to increase cycling.
背景/目的:骑自行车与健康有着良好的积极关系。有证据表明,大规模的基础设施和建筑环境倡议来促进骑自行车可能是必要的,但不足以最大限度地提高骑自行车的参与度。因此,更小规模的倡议,组织(例如,雇主)和团体(例如,社区团体)也可以实施,这也很重要,但促进骑自行车的可行活动的全部范围尚不清楚。我们的目的是综述文献并绘制组织、社会和个人层面的活动图,以增加骑自行车的人数。
设计:采用既定的五阶段流程进行范围综述。纳入标准:描述了组织或团体认为可行的促进骑自行车的倡议的研究或公开报告。证据来源和选择:(i)在线数据库(Ovid(医学文献在线)、Ovid(Embase)、SportDISCUS(Ebscohost)、ProQuest、Web of Science),(ii)现有系统综述,(iii)专家利益相关者咨询。
我们从 20 个不同国家的 129 项研究和报告中提取数据,确定了 145 项促进骑自行车的倡议。从这些倡议中,我们确定了 93 种行动类型中的 484 项行动,这些行动类型属于 Michie 描述的九个干预功能中的 33 个行动类别。环境重构(微观层面)、赋权、教育和说服是行动类型最多的功能,而强制、模仿和限制的行动类型最少。
这是第一个全面总结组织/团体基础的骑自行车促进倡议中可行的广泛行动类型的地图。该地图将成为社区、雇主、从业者和研究人员设计干预措施以增加骑自行车的重要工具。