Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall Rm 11522, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, B.C., V5A 1S6, Canada.
School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, 1021 Prince Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA, 22301, USA.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Sep;4(3):278-285. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0148-x.
While many levels of government recognize that walking and cycling (active travel) are critical to healthy cities, a continued challenge is to identify and prioritize strategies that will increase walking and cycling for transportation. We review evidence on policies that can increase active travel.
The reviews included here conclude that policies related to active travel may operate at various levels of the socio-ecological framework, including society, cities, routes or individuals. The provision of convenient, safe and connected walking and cycling infrastructure is at the core of promoting active travel, but policies may work best when implemented in comprehensive packages. There is strong evidence that active travel can result in substantial health benefits. However, there remains considerable uncertainty about the exact effects of specific policies on walking or cycling rates or safety. Further research is needed to quantify the impact of specific policies or packages of policies, especially across different settings or for different population segments.
尽管许多级别的政府都认识到步行和骑自行车(即积极出行)对健康城市至关重要,但持续面临的挑战是确定和优先考虑能够增加用于交通出行的步行和骑行的策略。我们综述了能够增加积极出行的政策方面的证据。
本文纳入的综述得出结论,与积极出行相关的政策可能在社会生态框架的各个层面发挥作用,包括社会、城市、路线或个人。便利、安全且连通的步行和骑行基础设施的提供是促进积极出行的核心,但当这些政策综合实施时可能效果最佳。有强有力的证据表明,积极出行可带来显著的健康益处。然而,对于具体政策对步行或骑行率或安全性的确切影响,仍存在相当大的不确定性。需要进一步研究来量化特定政策或一揽子政策的影响,尤其是在不同环境或针对不同人群时。