Arcos Asier Los, Aramendi José F, Emparanza Jose I, Castagna Carlo, Yanci Javier, Lezáun Alejandro, Martínez-Santos Raúl
Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Osasunkirol, Salud y Deporte, Hondarribia, Spain.
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Mar 31;72:229-239. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0109. eCollection 2020 Mar.
The aims of the study were: a) to analyze the reproducibility of the Modified Agility Test (MAT) according to two types of displacement (i.e. constrained [MATtop] vs. free [MATfree]), b) to examine the explanatory capacity of anthropometric characteristics and neuromuscular performance on the ability to change the direction (CODA), c) to look into the practical consequences of the types of displacement from the perspective of an elite soccer academy. 118 male soccer players (age: 16 (13-25) years old) from the same elite Spanish soccer academy (U13 to senior) were tested twice on two versions of the MAT (MATtop and MATfree), with 48 hours between testing sessions. Moreover, they were tested on linear-sprint performance, over 5 m (S5m) and 15 m (S15m), and the vertical jump (VJ) (countermovement jump with [ACMJ] and without an arm swing [CMJ]). The main findings were: a) the type of displacement did not affect the reliability of the CODA test; b) weight, S15m, ACMJ and CMJ variables explained close to 60% of CODA performance; c) MATtop (i.e. constrained displacement) and MATfree (i.e. free-displacement) CODA tests could show different profiles of development along the age groups; and d) the impact of the task's constraints was relatively higher in U16 and U17 groups. CODA seems to have a variable meaning depending on the characteristics of the test and the age of the participants.
a) 根据两种位移类型(即受限 [MATtop] 与自由 [MATfree])分析改良敏捷性测试(MAT)的可重复性;b) 检验人体测量特征和神经肌肉性能对改变方向能力(CODA)的解释能力;c) 从精英足球学院的角度探究位移类型的实际影响。来自同一西班牙精英足球学院(从U13到成年组)的118名男性足球运动员(年龄:16(13 - 25)岁)在两种版本的MAT(MATtop和MATfree)上进行了两次测试,测试之间间隔48小时。此外,他们还进行了直线冲刺性能测试,包括5米(S5m)和15米(S15m),以及垂直跳跃测试(有手臂摆动的反向移动跳跃 [ACMJ] 和无手臂摆动的反向移动跳跃 [CMJ])。主要研究结果为:a) 位移类型不影响CODA测试的可靠性;b) 体重、S15m、ACMJ和CMJ变量解释了近60%的CODA表现;c) MATtop(即受限位移)和MATfree(即自由位移)的CODA测试在不同年龄组中可能呈现不同的发展概况;d) 任务限制的影响在U16和U17组中相对较高。根据测试特征和参与者年龄,CODA似乎具有不同的含义。