Santos-García D, de Deus Fonticoba T, Suárez Castro E, Aneiros Díaz A, McAfee D
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), A Coruña, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol (CHUF), Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain.
Parkinsons Dis. 2020 Mar 24;2020:7537924. doi: 10.1155/2020/7537924. eCollection 2020.
5- (5 times oral levodopa tablet taken/day) 2- (2 hours of OFF time/day) 1- (1 hour/day of troublesome dyskinesia) criteria have been proposed by a Delphi expert consensus panel for diagnosing advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of the present study is to compare quality of life (QoL) in PD patients with "5-2-1 positive criteria" vs QoL in PD patients without "5-2-1 positive criteria" (defined as meeting ≥1 of the criteria).
This is a cross-sectional, observational, monocenter study. Three different instruments were used to assess QoL: the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire Summary Index Score (PDQ-39SI); a subjective rating of perceived QoL (PQ-10); and the EUROHIS-QOL 8-Item Index (EUROHIS-QOL8).
From a cohort of 102 PD patients (65.4 ± 8.2 years old, 53.9% males; disease duration 4.7 ± 4.5 years), 20 (19.6%) presented positive 5-2-1 criteria: 6.9% for 5, 17.6% for 2, and 4.9% for 1. 37.5% (12/32) and 25% (5/20) of patients with motor complications and dyskinesia, respectively, presented 5-2-1 negative criteria. Both health-related (PDQ-39SI, 25.6 ± 14 vs 12.1 ± 9.2; < 0.0001) and global QoL (PQ-10, 6.1 ± 2 vs 7.1 ± 1.3; =0.007; EUROHIS-QOL8, 3.5 ± 0.5 vs 3.7 ± 0.4; =0.034) were worse in patients with 5-2-1 positive criteria. Moreover, nonmotor symptoms burden (Non-Motor Symptoms Scale total score, 64.8 ± 44.8 vs 39.4 ± 35.1; < 0.0001) and autonomy for activities of daily living (ADLS scale, 73.5 ± 13.1 vs 89.2 ± 9.3; < 0.0001) were worse in patients with 5-2-1 positive criteria. Patient's principal caregiver's strain (Caregiver Stain Index, 4.3 ± 3 vs 1.5 ± 1.6; < 0.0001), burden (Zarit Caregiver Burden Inventory, 28.4 ± 12.5 vs 10.9 ± 9.8; < 0.0001), and mood (Beck Depression Inventory II, 12.2 ± 7.2 vs 6.2 ± 6.1; < 0.0001) were worse in patients with 5-2-1 positive criteria as well.
QoL is worse in patients meeting ≥1 of the 5-2-1 criteria. This group of patients and their caregivers are more affected as a whole. These criteria could be useful for identifying patients in which it is necessary to optimize Parkinson's treatment.
一个德尔菲专家共识小组提出了用于诊断晚期帕金森病(PD)的5-(每天口服左旋多巴片5次)-2-(每天2小时“关”期)-1-(每天1小时严重异动症)标准。本研究的目的是比较符合“5-2-1阳性标准”的PD患者与不符合“5-2-1阳性标准”(定义为符合≥1项标准)的PD患者的生活质量(QoL)。
这是一项横断面、观察性、单中心研究。使用三种不同的工具来评估生活质量:39项帕金森病生活质量问卷综合指数评分(PDQ-39SI);对感知生活质量的主观评分(PQ-10);以及欧洲健康状况调查8项指数(EUROHIS-QOL8)。
在102例PD患者队列中(年龄65.4±8.2岁,男性占53.9%;病程4.7±4.5年),20例(19.6%)呈现5-2-1阳性标准:5项标准符合率为6.9%,2项标准符合率为17.6%,1项标准符合率为4.9%。有运动并发症和异动症的患者中,分别有37.5%(12/32)和25%(5/20)呈现5-2-1阴性标准。符合5-2-1阳性标准的患者,其健康相关生活质量(PDQ-39SI,25.6±14 vs 12.1±9.2;P<0.0001)和总体生活质量(PQ-10,6.1±2 vs 7.1±1.3;P=0.007;EUROHIS-QOL8,3.5±0.5 vs 3.7±0.4;P=0.034)均较差。此外,符合5-2-1阳性标准的患者,其非运动症状负担(非运动症状量表总分,64.8±44.8 vs 39.4±35.1;P<0.0001)和日常生活活动自主性(ADLS量表,73.5±13.1 vs 89.2±9.3;P<0.0001)也较差。符合5-2-1阳性标准患者的主要照料者的压力(照料者压力指数,4.3±3 vs 1.5±1.6;P<0.0001)、负担(扎里特照料者负担量表,28.4±12.5 vs 10.9±9.8;P<0.0001)和情绪(贝克抑郁量表第二版,12.2±7.2 vs 6.2±6.1;P<0.0001)同样较差。
符合5-2-1标准中≥1项标准的患者生活质量较差。这组患者及其照料者整体受影响更大。这些标准可能有助于识别需要优化帕金森病治疗的患者。