Department of Neurology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Department of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Biomolecules. 2023 May 12;13(5):829. doi: 10.3390/biom13050829.
Current pharmacotherapy has limited efficacy and/or intolerable side effects in late-stage Parkinson's disease (LsPD) patients whose daily life depends primarily on caregivers and palliative care. Clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD patients. We explored if a D dopamine agonist would have efficacy in LsPD using a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover phase Ia/b study comparing the D agonist PF-06412562 to levodopa/carbidopa in six LsPD patients. Caregiver assessment was the primary efficacy measure because caregivers were with patients throughout the study, and standard clinical metrics inadequately gauge efficacy in LsPD. Assessments included standard quantitative scales of motor function (MDS-UPDRS-III), alertness (Glasgow Coma and Stanford Sleepiness Scales), and cognition (Severe Impairment and Frontal Assessment Batteries) at baseline (Day 1) and thrice daily during drug testing (Days 2-3). Clinicians and caregivers completed the clinical impression of change questionnaires, and caregivers participated in a qualitative exit interview. Blinded triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data was used to integrate findings. Neither traditional scales nor clinician impression of change detected consistent differences between treatments in the five participants who completed the study. Conversely, the overall caregiver data strongly favored PF-06412562 over levodopa in four of five patients. The most meaningful improvements converged on motor, alertness, and functional engagement. These data suggest for the first time that there can be useful pharmacological intervention in LsPD patients using D agonists and also that caregiver perspectives with mixed method analyses may overcome limitations using methods common in early-stage patients. The results encourage future clinical studies and understanding of the most efficacious signaling properties of a D agonist for this population.
目前,对于主要依赖护理人员和姑息治疗的晚期帕金森病(LsPD)患者,药物治疗的疗效有限,或存在无法耐受的副作用。临床指标无法充分评估 LsPD 患者的疗效。我们通过一项为期 Ia/b 期、双盲安慰剂对照交叉研究,探索了 D 受体激动剂在 LsPD 患者中的疗效,该研究比较了 D 受体激动剂 PF-06412562 与左旋多巴/卡比多巴在 6 名 LsPD 患者中的疗效。护理人员评估是主要的疗效指标,因为在整个研究过程中,护理人员都与患者在一起,而标准的临床指标无法充分评估 LsPD 患者的疗效。评估包括运动功能(MDS-UPDRS-III)、警觉性(格拉斯哥昏迷量表和斯坦福嗜睡量表)和认知功能(严重损伤和额叶评估量表)的标准定量量表,在基线(第 1 天)和药物测试期间每天三次(第 2-3 天)进行。临床医生和护理人员完成了临床变化印象问卷,护理人员还参加了定性退出访谈。使用定量和定性数据的盲法三角剖分来整合研究结果。在完成研究的五名参与者中,传统量表或临床医生对变化的印象均未能检测到两种治疗方法之间的一致差异。相反,在所有五名患者中,整体护理人员数据强烈倾向于 PF-06412562 优于左旋多巴。最有意义的改善集中在运动、警觉性和功能参与上。这些数据首次表明,使用 D 受体激动剂可以对 LsPD 患者进行有效的药物干预,并且使用混合方法分析的护理人员观点可能会克服使用早期患者常见方法的局限性。这些结果鼓励未来进行临床研究,并加深对该人群中 D 受体激动剂最有效信号特性的理解。