Suppr超能文献

在配备四个相同杠杆与四种不同反应操作装置的训练隔间中进行的四种药物辨别比较。

Comparison of four-drug discriminations in training compartments with four identical levers versus four different responses manipulanda.

作者信息

Overton D A, Shen C F

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Aug;30(4):879-88. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90114-1.

Abstract

Rats were trained to discriminate between four dissimilar drugs (phenobarbital, nicotine, fentanyl, and methylphenidate) in compartments which contained either four identical levers or four dissimilar response manipulanda. During successive training sessions, the drug condition was cycled through the four training conditions. The objective was to compare speed of acquisition and asymptotic accuracy of discriminative control in the following types of compartments: (1) Undecorated compartments with four identical levers; (2) Compartments with four dissimilar response manipulanda (lever, wheel, nosepoke, panel); (3) Four-lever compartments with a unique sensory environment surrounding each lever; (4) Compartments with four dissimilar manipulanda, each surrounded by a unique sensory environment. The required four-drug discrimination were learned in all training compartments. Independent variables that produced statistically significant effects on speed of acquisition and/or asymptotic accuracy included drug, dosage, use/nonuse of four dissimilar response manipulanda, and presence/absence of environmental decorations around each manipulandum. Although the use of four different response manipulanda and/or the use of distinctive decorations surrounding each of the four manipulanda did increase speed of acquisition, these manipulations also resulted in biases towards/against particular individual environments or manipulanda during the acquisition phase of the experiment. Such biases can complicate the interpretation of results of conventional drug discrimination studies, especially if they persist into the asymptotic accuracy phase, which was not observed in the present study.

摘要

大鼠在含有四个相同杠杆或四个不同反应操作装置的隔室内接受训练,以区分四种不同的药物(苯巴比妥、尼古丁、芬太尼和哌甲酯)。在连续的训练阶段,药物条件在四种训练条件之间循环。目的是比较以下几种类型隔室内辨别控制的习得速度和渐近准确性:(1)带有四个相同杠杆的无装饰隔室;(2)带有四个不同反应操作装置(杠杆、轮子、鼻触、面板)的隔室;(3)每个杠杆周围有独特感觉环境的四杠杆隔室;(4)每个操作装置周围有独特感觉环境的四个不同操作装置的隔室。在所有训练隔室内都学会了所需的四种药物辨别。对习得速度和/或渐近准确性产生统计学显著影响的自变量包括药物、剂量、是否使用四个不同的反应操作装置以及每个操作装置周围是否有环境装饰。虽然使用四个不同的反应操作装置和/或在四个操作装置周围使用独特的装饰确实提高了习得速度,但这些操作在实验的习得阶段也导致了对特定个体环境或操作装置的偏向/反感。这种偏向会使传统药物辨别研究结果的解释复杂化,尤其是如果它们持续到渐近准确性阶段,而本研究中未观察到这种情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验