• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

柠檬酸和次氯酸钠作为消毒剂对牛支原体的杀灭效果。

Efficacy of citric acid and sodium hypochlorite as disinfectants against Mycoplasma bovis.

机构信息

Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, Melbourne Veterinary School, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.

Ministry for Primary Industries, Mycoplasma bovis Directorate, Biosecurity New Zealand, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand; Kate Sawford Epidemiological Consulting Pty Ltd., New South Wales, 2622, Australia.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2020 Apr;243:108630. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108630. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108630
PMID:32273009
Abstract

Mycoplasma bovis, a cattle pathogen of major economic importance across the globe, causes a range of diseases, including pneumonia and mastitis. Because of the limited options for effective treatment of these diseases, prevention and control are preferred to diagnosis and treatment. In this study, the efficacies of citric acid and sodium hypochlorite as disinfectants against M. bovis were tested using a modification of a standardised method for assessing the efficacy of disinfectants against bacteria. A citric acid concentration of 0.5 % was found to be an effective disinfectant, reducing infectivity by close to 10 fold, while sodium hypochlorite at 1% was found to have similar efficacy to 0.5 % citric acid. A 0.04 % concentration of sodium hypochlorite was effective against M. bovis only in the absence of any organic material. Under these conditions, 0.25 % citric acid found to have similar efficacy. These findings indicate that 0.5 % citric acid or 1 % sodium hypochlorite are likely to be effective disinfectants for M. bovis under field conditions and 0.04 % sodium hypochlorite or 0.25 % citric acid are likely to be effective following removal of organic material.

摘要

牛支原体是一种具有全球重要经济意义的牛病原体,可引起多种疾病,包括肺炎和乳腺炎。由于对这些疾病进行有效治疗的选择有限,因此预防和控制优于诊断和治疗。在这项研究中,使用标准化方法评估消毒剂对细菌的功效的改良方法,测试了柠檬酸和次氯酸钠作为消毒剂对 M. bovis 的功效。发现柠檬酸浓度为 0.5%是一种有效的消毒剂,可将感染力降低近 10 倍,而 1%的次氯酸钠的功效与 0.5%柠檬酸相似。0.04%的次氯酸钠在没有任何有机物质的情况下才对 M. bovis 有效。在这些条件下,发现 0.25%柠檬酸具有相似的功效。这些发现表明,在田间条件下,0.5%柠檬酸或 1%次氯酸钠可能是 M. bovis 的有效消毒剂,而在去除有机物质后,0.04%次氯酸钠或 0.25%柠檬酸可能是有效的。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of citric acid and sodium hypochlorite as disinfectants against Mycoplasma bovis.柠檬酸和次氯酸钠作为消毒剂对牛支原体的杀灭效果。
Vet Microbiol. 2020 Apr;243:108630. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108630. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
2
Global transcriptome analysis of the Mycobacterium bovis BCG response to sodium hypochlorite.牛分枝杆菌卡介苗对次氯酸钠反应的全转录组分析
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009 Nov;85(1):127-40. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2208-0.
3
The mycoplasmacidal properties of sodium hypochlorite.次氯酸钠的杀支原体特性。
J Hyg (Lond). 1985 Oct;95(2):243-53. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400062677.
4
Disinfection of foot-and-mouth disease and African swine fever viruses with citric acid and sodium hypochlorite on birch wood carriers.柠檬酸和次氯酸钠对桦木载体上的口蹄疫病毒和非洲猪瘟病毒的消毒作用。
Vet Microbiol. 2012 Apr 23;156(1-2):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.10.032. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
5
Staphylococcus aureus dry-surface biofilms are not killed by sodium hypochlorite: implications for infection control.金黄色葡萄球菌干表面生物膜不能被次氯酸钠杀灭:对感染控制的启示
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Jul;93(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
6
Hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants are more effective against and biofilms than quaternary ammonium compounds.过氧化氢和次氯酸钠消毒剂比季铵盐化合物更能有效对抗 和 生物膜。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Dec 17;7:154. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0447-5. eCollection 2018.
7
Sodium hypochlorite is more effective than 70% ethanol against biofilms of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.次氯酸钠对金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株生物膜的清除效果优于 70%乙醇。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Jun;46(6):e37-e42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.12.015. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
Efficacy of various spray disinfectants on irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.各种喷雾消毒剂对不可逆水胶体印模的效果
Int J Prosthodont. 1992 Jan-Feb;5(1):47-54.
9
In vitro virucidal activity of sodium hypochlorite against canine parvovirus type 2.次氯酸钠对犬细小病毒 2 型的体外抗病毒活性。
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Nov;146(15):2010-2013. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818002431. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
Effect of the sodium hypochlorite and citric acid association on smear layer removal of primary molars.次氯酸钠与柠檬酸联合使用对乳磨牙玷污层去除的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2005 Oct-Dec;19(4):261-6. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242005000400005. Epub 2006 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects and function of citric acid on fermentation quality and microbial community in sugarcane tops silage with high and low water-soluble carbohydrate content.柠檬酸对不同水溶性碳水化合物含量甘蔗梢青贮发酵品质及微生物群落的影响与作用
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06063-2.
2
A "plus one" strategy impacts replication of felid alphaherpesvirus 1, and and the metabolism of coinfected feline cells.“增效策略”影响猫α疱疹病毒 1 的复制,以及感染细胞的代谢。
mSystems. 2024 Oct 22;9(10):e0085224. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00852-24. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Chemical Characterization and Effect of a Lactobacilli-Postbiotic on Biofilm In Vitro.
乳酸菌后生元的化学表征及其对体外生物膜的影响
Microorganisms. 2024 Apr 23;12(5):843. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12050843.
4
Assessment of acute inhalation toxicity of citric acid and sodium hypochlorite in rats.柠檬酸和次氯酸钠急性吸入毒性在大鼠体内的评估。
J Vet Sci. 2023 Mar;24(2):e22. doi: 10.4142/jvs.22253.
5
Synthesis, determination, and bio-application in cellular and biomass-bamboo imaging of natural cinnamaldehyde derivatives.天然肉桂醛衍生物的合成、测定及其在细胞和生物质竹成像中的生物应用
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Aug 11;10:963128. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.963128. eCollection 2022.
6
Biocide Use in the Antimicrobial Era: A Review.抗菌时代的杀生剂使用:综述
Molecules. 2021 Apr 14;26(8):2276. doi: 10.3390/molecules26082276.
7
Analysis of Commercial Hand Sanitisers amid CoViD-19: Are We Getting the Products that We Need?新冠疫情期间商业手部消毒剂分析:我们使用的是我们需要的产品吗?
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020 Oct 15;21(7):286. doi: 10.1208/s12249-020-01818-6.
8
Infections-Occurrence, Diagnosis and Control.感染——发生、诊断与控制
Pathogens. 2020 Aug 6;9(8):640. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9080640.