Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Oct;15(7):781-788. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1749896. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
The research presented demonstrates the disharmony between end user goals and their consideration in service outcomes within ageing-in-place and asks "what can design offer health" within this domain. Data was collected using semi-structured interviews with various stakeholders within the context of ageing in place. All data are thematically analysed through a theoretical lens of control theory. The results demonstrate a contrast between purported patient-centred care models, and a human-centred design model. This contrast in cultures causes a disconnect between the health practitioners and the end users, with a lack of clarity about the end user's intended engagement within the modification of their environment. Consequently, the goals of older adults are inadequately represented as typical home modification design processes often fail to support the reflection of goals in practice, in turn, restricting client engagement and control. Reviewing occupational therapy practices through the critical lens of control has highlighted opportunities for service improvements. The consideration of co-design methodologies within home modification design is a way to reinforce client engagement and provide better pathways for older adults to remain in control and raise acceptability of modification through a better-informed decision-making process.Implications for RehabilitationThe following points detail the implications of this research upon the rehabilitation practice and theory: Compliance with recommendations is deeply connected to a person's intrinsic sense of control within the clinical decision-making process.Co-design practices between practitioners and clients provide and novel pathway to achieve truly person-centred care and create better service experiences and clinical outcomes.The human-centred design methodology is highly applicable within clinical practice and provides an opportunity for clinicians to see and learn about their patients through a holistic lens centred around goals and motivations rather than physical impairments.The scoping of health literacy should be inclusive of all service artefacts and touchpoints that a client may encounter throughout the entire duration of experience, this includes design artefacts such as architectural drawings and other home modification designs.
本研究展示了终端用户目标与其在就地老龄化服务成果中的考虑之间的不和谐,并在该领域提出了“设计能为健康提供什么”的问题。研究数据是通过在就地老龄化背景下对各种利益相关者进行半结构化访谈收集的。所有数据都通过控制理论的理论视角进行主题分析。研究结果展示了所谓的以患者为中心的护理模式与以人为中心的设计模式之间的对比。这种文化上的对比导致了医疗保健从业者和终端用户之间的脱节,对于终端用户在其环境修改中的预期参与缺乏明确性。因此,老年人的目标没有得到充分体现,因为典型的家庭改造设计过程通常无法支持目标在实践中的反映,从而限制了客户的参与和控制。通过控制的批判视角审查职业治疗实践,突出了服务改进的机会。在家庭改造设计中考虑共同设计方法是增强客户参与度的一种方式,并通过一个更明智的决策过程为老年人提供更好的控制和提高改造的可接受性的途径。
以下几点详细说明了这项研究对康复实践和理论的意义:在临床决策过程中,遵守建议与一个人的内在控制感密切相关。从业者和客户之间的共同设计实践提供了一条新颖的途径,以实现真正以患者为中心的护理,并创造更好的服务体验和临床结果。以人为中心的设计方法在临床实践中非常适用,为临床医生提供了一个机会,通过围绕目标和动机的整体视角而不是身体损伤来了解和学习他们的患者。健康素养的范围应包括客户在整个体验过程中可能遇到的所有服务人工制品和接触点,这包括设计人工制品,如建筑图纸和其他家庭改造设计。