Department of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, United States.
Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States.
J Am Chem Soc. 2020 May 20;142(20):9097-9105. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13198. Epub 2020 May 11.
Untargeted metabolomics aims to quantify the complete set of metabolites within a biological system, most commonly by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Since nearly the inception of the field, compound identification has been widely recognized as the rate-limiting step of the experimental workflow. In spite of exponential increases in the size of metabolomic databases, which now contain experimental MS/MS spectra for over a half a million reference compounds, chemical structures still cannot be confidently assigned to many signals in a typical LC/MS dataset. The purpose of this Perspective is to consider why identification rates continue to be low in untargeted metabolomics. One rationalization is that many naturally occurring metabolites detected by LC/MS are true "novel" compounds that have yet to be incorporated into metabolomic databases. An alternative possibility, however, is that research data do not provide database matches because of informatic artifacts, chemical contaminants, and signal redundancies. Increasing evidence suggests that, for at least some sample types, many unidentifiable signals in untargeted metabolomics result from the latter rather than new compounds originating from the specimen being measured. The implications of these observations on chemical discovery in untargeted metabolomics are discussed.
非靶向代谢组学旨在定量分析生物系统中的全部代谢物,最常用的方法是液相色谱/质谱联用(LC/MS)。自该领域创立以来,化合物鉴定就被广泛认为是实验工作流程中的限速步骤。尽管代谢组学数据库的规模呈指数级增长,现在包含了超过 50 万个参考化合物的实验 MS/MS 谱,但在典型的 LC/MS 数据集,仍有许多信号的化学结构无法被准确确定。本文的目的是探讨为什么在非靶向代谢组学中鉴定率仍然很低。一种解释是,LC/MS 检测到的许多天然存在的代谢物是真正的“新”化合物,尚未被纳入代谢组学数据库。然而,另一种可能性是,由于信息学伪影、化学污染物和信号冗余,研究数据没有与数据库匹配。越来越多的证据表明,至少对于某些样本类型,非靶向代谢组学中许多无法识别的信号是由于后者而不是来自被测量样本的新化合物造成的。本文讨论了这些观察结果对非靶向代谢组学中化学发现的影响。