Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
School of Public Health, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Jun;55(6):1340-1348. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24771. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
Limited work has directly compared the role of different neighborhood factors or examined their interactive effects on pediatric asthma outcomes. Our objective was to quantify the main and interactive effects of neighborhood deprivation and residential instability (RI) on pediatric asthma outcomes.
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients with a primary diagnosis of asthma hospitalized at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Residential addresses at the index hospitalization were linked to the state area deprivation index (ADI). RI was coded as the number of residences in the past 4 years. Logistic and ordinal regression and Cox regression survival analyses were used to estimate the effect on the primary outcomes of chronic asthma severity (intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent, severe persistent/other) as defined by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, severe hospitalization (requiring continuous albuterol or intensive care unit care), and time to emergency department (ED) readmission and rehospitalization within 365 days of the index visit, respectively.
In the sample (N = 664), 21% had severe persistent/other asthma, 22% had severe hospitalization, 37% were readmitted to the ED, and 19% were rehospitalized. Increasing RI was independently associated with more severe chronic asthma (odds ratio = 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05, 1.32, P = .004), greater risk of 365-day ED readmission (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.15, P < .0001), and greater risk of 365-day rehospitalization (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03, 1.14, P = .002). There were no significant associations between ADI and these outcomes. Further, we did not find significant evidence of interactive effects.
RI appears to be modestly associated with pediatric asthma outcomes, independent of current neighborhood deprivation.
有限的研究工作直接比较了不同邻里因素的作用,或检验了它们对儿科哮喘结果的交互影响。我们的目的是量化邻里剥夺和居住不稳定性(RI)对儿科哮喘结果的主要和交互作用。
我们对在一家三级儿科医院住院的原发性哮喘患者进行了回顾性横断面研究。索引住院时的居住地址与州区域剥夺指数(ADI)相关联。RI 编码为过去 4 年中居住的次数。使用逻辑回归和有序回归以及 Cox 回归生存分析来估计对主要结果的影响,主要结果为根据美国国立心肺血液研究所定义的慢性哮喘严重程度(间歇性、轻度持续性、中度持续性、重度持续性/其他)、严重住院(需要持续沙丁胺醇或重症监护病房护理)以及急诊室(ED)再入院和索引就诊后 365 天内再次住院的时间。
在样本(N=664)中,21%的患者患有重度持续性/其他哮喘,22%的患者患有严重住院,37%的患者 ED 再入院,19%的患者再次住院。RI 的增加与更严重的慢性哮喘独立相关(比值比=1.18,95%置信区间[CI]为 1.05-1.32,P=0.004),365 天 ED 再入院的风险增加(风险比[HR]=1.10,95%CI 为 1.05-1.15,P<.0001),365 天再住院的风险增加(HR=1.09,95%CI 为 1.03-1.14,P=0.002)。ADI 与这些结果之间没有显著关联。此外,我们没有发现交互作用的显著证据。
RI 与儿科哮喘结果有一定关联,与当前邻里剥夺无关。