Wieler Jane, Lehman Erik, Khalid Muhammad, Hennrikus Eileen
Department of Emergency Medicine, Jefferson University Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020 Mar 30;11:253-258. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S247974. eCollection 2020.
In the past decade, internal medicine residencies have undergone major changes in competency-based assessments, work-hour restrictions and the implementation of the electronic medical record. The aim of this study is to compare a typical day of a first year post-graduate (PGY1) to that of a third year post-graduate (PGY3) internal medicine resident and examine if the differences in their days demonstrate the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) desired progression towards competency-based milestones and unsupervised practice.
We conducted an observational time study documenting 14,103 minutes, 9 major categories, and 17 subcategories while shadowing 10 internal medicine PGY1s and 10 PGY3s during inpatient, non-call days. The following day, house staff completed surveys of their perceived time allocation of the previous 24 hours.
PGY1s spent an average of 12.5 hours managing an average of 6 patients. Thirty-eight percent of their time was spent on the computer, 21% discussing patients and 18% directly with patients. PGY3s, overseeing an average of 12 patients, worked 1.5 hours less per day (p<0.001), had 1.5 hours less computer time (p=0.001), 24 minutes less direct patient contact (p=0.045), and 36 minutes more patient care discussions (p=0.011).
The difference between PGY1s' and PGY3s' daily time allocations is minimal. Whereas a PGY3 spends 1.5 hours less than a PGY1 on writing computer notes and discharges, they also work 1.5 hours less per day. The additional 36 minutes of patient care discussions was the only significant time quantity difference that would be considered a higher level of practice for the PGY3 compared to the PGY1. With residents now caring for fewer patients, there has been a marked increase in computer time per patient for both PGY1s and PGY3s.
在过去十年中,内科住院医师培训项目在基于能力的评估、工作时间限制以及电子病历的应用方面发生了重大变化。本研究的目的是比较内科住院医师第一年(PGY1)和第三年(PGY3)典型的一天,并检查他们日常的差异是否体现了美国内科医学委员会(ABIM)所期望的朝着基于能力的里程碑和独立执业的进展。
我们进行了一项观察性时间研究,在10名内科PGY1和10名PGY3住院医师的非值班住院日进行跟踪观察,记录了14103分钟、9个主要类别和17个子类别。第二天,住院医师完成了对前24小时时间分配的感知调查。
PGY1平均花费12.5小时管理平均6名患者。他们38%的时间花在电脑上,21%用于讨论患者,18%直接与患者接触。PGY3平均负责12名患者,每天工作时间少1.5小时(p<0.001),电脑操作时间少1.5小时(p=0.001),与患者直接接触时间少24分钟(p=0.045),而患者护理讨论时间多36分钟(p=0.011)。
PGY1和PGY3每日时间分配的差异很小。虽然PGY3在撰写电脑记录和办理出院手续上比PGY1少花1.5小时,但他们每天的工作时间也少1.5小时。额外的36分钟患者护理讨论是唯一显著的时间量差异,与PGY1相比,这可被视为PGY3更高水平的执业表现。由于住院医师现在护理的患者减少,PGY1和PGY3照顾每名患者的电脑操作时间都显著增加。