• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉血栓栓塞症的预防:因同一住院期间风险变化而需要持续评估

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: Need for Continuous Assessment Due to Changes in Risk During the Same Hospitalization.

作者信息

Chaudhary Rahul, Kirchoff Robert, Kingsley Thomas, Newman James S, Houghton Damon E, McBane Robert D

机构信息

Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Division of Vascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar 18;4(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.12.004. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.12.004
PMID:32280927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7140011/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the role of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk reassessment in hospitalized medically ill patients without a change in level of care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this exploratory retrospective study, the medical records of 171 consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) hospitalized under the medicine service for more than 3 days without a change in the level of care from January 1, 2015, to March 1, 2015, were reviewed. The primary outcome was a change in the risk score between day 1 and day 3 of hospital stay (using the Padua Prediction Score). The secondary outcomes were changes in risk stratification class (low vs high) and cost-benefit analysis.

RESULTS

The risk score was significantly different between day 1 and day 3 (4.7±1.7 vs 4.2±1.8; =.008). All the patients with low risk on day 1 remained at low risk on day 3. However, 25 of 136 patients (18.4%) with high risk on day 1 were reclassified as low risk on day 3 (<.001). No patients changed from low risk to high risk at day 3. The reclassification could have saved $35 per patient-day of inappropriate pharmacological prophylaxis in addition to patient discomfort, bleeding risk, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to suggest the need for regular assessment for VTE risk on medicine wards because of changing patient risk. Regular reassessment could reduce health care waste and patient discomfort.

摘要

目的

探讨静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)风险重新评估在住院病情无变化的内科患者中的作用。

患者与方法

在这项探索性回顾性研究中,回顾了2015年1月1日至2015年3月1日期间在内科服务下连续住院超过3天且护理级别无变化的171例成年患者(≥18岁)的病历。主要结局是住院第1天和第3天之间风险评分的变化(使用帕多瓦预测评分)。次要结局是风险分层类别(低风险与高风险)的变化以及成本效益分析。

结果

第1天和第3天的风险评分存在显著差异(4.7±1.7对4.2±1.8;P =.008)。第1天低风险的所有患者在第3天仍为低风险。然而,第1天高风险的136例患者中有25例(18.4%)在第3天被重新分类为低风险(P<.001)。第3天没有患者从低风险变为高风险。除了患者不适、出血风险和肝素诱导的血小板减少症外,重新分类可为每位患者每天节省35美元的不适当药物预防费用。

结论

这是第一项表明由于患者风险变化,内科病房需要定期评估VTE风险的研究。定期重新评估可减少医疗保健浪费和患者不适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2275/7140011/eee4a8571d47/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2275/7140011/eee4a8571d47/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2275/7140011/eee4a8571d47/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: Need for Continuous Assessment Due to Changes in Risk During the Same Hospitalization.静脉血栓栓塞症的预防:因同一住院期间风险变化而需要持续评估
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar 18;4(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.12.004. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Clinical impact of application of risk assessment models (Padua Prediction Score and Improve Bleeding Score) on venous thromboembolism, major hemorrhage and health expenditure associated with pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis: a "real life" prospective and retrospective observational study on patients hospitalized in a Single Internal Medicine Unit (the STIME study).风险评估模型(Padua 预测评分和改善出血评分)在静脉血栓栓塞症、大出血和与药物预防 VTE 相关的卫生支出方面的临床影响:一项在单个内科病房住院患者中进行的“真实生活”前瞻性和回顾性观察研究(STIME 研究)。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;13(4):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1808-z. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
3
Reassessment of venous thromboembolism and bleeding risk in medical patients receiving VTE prophylaxis.评估接受 VTE 预防治疗的住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症和出血风险。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;26(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/jep.13213. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
4
Pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism and 30-day outcomes among older patients hospitalized with heart failure: an analysis from the ADHERE national registry linked to Medicare claims.心力衰竭住院老年患者的静脉血栓栓塞症药物预防和 30 天结局:来自 ADHERE 国家登记处与医疗保险索赔链接的分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;34(11):682-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.20986. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
5
Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.深静脉血栓形成的家庭治疗与住院治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;1(1):CD003076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003076.pub3.
6
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis: Inadequate and Overprophylaxis When Comparing Perceived Versus Calculated Risk.静脉血栓栓塞预防:比较感知风险与计算风险时的预防不足和过度预防
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2017 Dec 1;1(3):242-247. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2017.10.003. eCollection 2017 Dec.
7
Quality gap in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis practices in inpatients: Assessment of prophylaxis practices in a University Hospital.静脉血栓栓塞症预防实践中的质量差距:某大学医院的预防实践评估。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Jul 28;33(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab104.
8
Impact of a Program to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis on Incidence of Thromboembolism and Bleeding Rates in Hospitalized Patients During Implementation of Programs to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.在实施静脉血栓栓塞预防改善项目期间,一项静脉血栓栓塞预防改善项目对住院患者血栓栓塞发生率和出血率的影响。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Feb 17;4(2):159-169. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.10.006. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism in medically ill hospitalized elderly cancer patients: a prospective observational study.医学疾病住院老年癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞症的发生率及预测因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jul;27(7):2507-2515. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4537-y. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
10
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with anticoagulation in septic patients: a prospective cohort study.脓毒症患者抗凝预防静脉血栓栓塞症:一项前瞻性队列研究。
QJM. 2015 Mar;108(3):197-204. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu183. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Simple, Effective and Validated. VTE CASE Risk Assessment Score for Venous Thromboembolism in Metastatic Germ Cell Tumour Patients Before First-Line Chemotherapy.简单、有效且经过验证。在一线化疗前,转移性生殖细胞肿瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞的 VTE CASE 风险评估评分。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70295. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70295.
2
Caprini versus Padua venous thromboembolism risk assessment scores: A comparative study in hospitalized patients at a tertiary center.卡普里尼与帕多瓦静脉血栓栓塞风险评估评分:在一家三级中心住院患者中的比较研究。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Apr;45(4):362-368. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.4.20230954.
3
Derivation and External Validation of a Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Chinese Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis after Hospitalization for Medical Illness.利伐沙班用于医疗疾病住院后的血栓预防。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1118-1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805090. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
2
Effect of a near-universal hospitalization-based prophylaxis regimen on annual number of venous thromboembolism events in the US.一种近乎普遍的基于住院治疗的预防方案对美国每年静脉血栓栓塞事件数量的影响。
Blood. 2017 Jul 13;130(2):109-114. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-12-758995. Epub 2017 May 8.
3
Extended Thromboprophylaxis with Betrixaban in Acutely Ill Medical Patients.
中文译文:住院中国患者静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型的推导和外部验证。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296221151164. doi: 10.1177/10760296221151164.
急性病医学患者贝曲西班的延长血栓预防。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):534-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601747. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
Assessing the magnitude and trends in hospital acquired infections in Canadian hospitals through sequential point prevalence surveys.通过连续的现患率调查评估加拿大医院中医院获得性感染的规模和趋势。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 May 21;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0118-3. eCollection 2016.
5
The temporal trends of incidence, treatment, and in-hospital mortality of acute myocardial infarction over 15years in a Taiwanese population.台湾人群中急性心肌梗死的发病率、治疗情况及院内死亡率的15年时间趋势。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 15;209:103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
6
In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke.院内缺血性卒中
Neurohospitalist. 2015 Jul;5(3):173-81. doi: 10.1177/1941874415588319.
7
In-hospital worsening heart failure and associations with mortality, readmission, and healthcare utilization.院内心力衰竭恶化及其与死亡率、再入院率和医疗保健利用的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jul 11;3(4):e001088. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001088.
8
Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.利伐沙班用于急性病医学患者的血栓预防。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 7;368(6):513-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111096.
9
Identifying risk factors for venous thromboembolism.
Circulation. 2012 May 1;125(17):2051-3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.102814. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.非外科患者的 VTE 预防:抗血栓治疗和血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会基于证据的临床实践指南。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e195S-e226S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2296.