Suppr超能文献

穆斯林何时可以撤销或停止维持生命的支持?对伊斯兰教法裁决的叙述性综述。

When can Muslims withdraw or withhold life support? A narrative review of Islamic juridical rulings.

作者信息

Mohiuddin Afshan, Suleman Mehrunisha, Rasheed Shoaib, Padela Aasim I

机构信息

Initiative on Islam and Medicine, Program on Medicine and Religion, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Regional Medical Center, Macomb Township, MI, USA.

出版信息

Glob Bioeth. 2020 Mar 22;31(1):29-46. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

When it is ethically justifiable to stop medical treatment? For many Muslim patients, families, and clinicians this ethical question remains a challenging one as Islamic ethico-legal guidance on such matters remains scattered and difficult to interpret. In light of this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review to aggregate rulings from Islamic jurists and juridical councils on whether, and when, it is permitted to withdraw and/or withhold life-sustaining care. A total of 16 were found, 8 of which were single-author rulings, and 8 represented the collective view of a juridical council. The are similar in that nearly all judge that Islamic law, provided certain conditions are met, permits abstaining from life-sustaining treatment. Notably, the justifying conditions appear to rely on physician assessment of the clinical prognosis. The differ when it comes to what conditions justify withdrawing or withholding life- sustaining care. Our analyses suggest that while notions of futility greatly impact the bioethical discourse regarding with holding and/or withdrawal of treatment, the conceptualization of futility lacks nuance. Therefore, clinicians, Islamic jurists, and bioethicists need to come together in order to unify a conception of medical futility and relate it to the ethics of withholding and/or withdrawal of treatment.

摘要

何时停止医疗治疗在伦理上是合理的?对于许多穆斯林患者、家庭和临床医生来说,这个伦理问题仍然具有挑战性,因为伊斯兰伦理法律在这类问题上的指导仍然分散且难以解释。鉴于这一差距,我们进行了一项系统的文献综述,以汇总伊斯兰法学家和司法委员会关于是否以及何时允许撤销和/或拒绝维持生命治疗的裁决。总共找到了16项裁决,其中8项是单作者裁决,8项代表司法委员会的集体观点。这些裁决的相似之处在于,几乎所有人都认为,只要满足某些条件,伊斯兰法律允许放弃维持生命的治疗。值得注意的是,合理的条件似乎依赖于医生对临床预后的评估。在哪些条件可以证明撤销或拒绝维持生命的治疗是合理的问题上,这些裁决存在差异。我们的分析表明,虽然无效性的概念对关于拒绝和/或撤销治疗的生物伦理讨论有很大影响,但无效性的概念缺乏细微差别。因此,临床医生、伊斯兰法学家和生物伦理学家需要共同努力,以统一医疗无效性的概念,并将其与拒绝和/或撤销治疗的伦理联系起来。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验