• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于单中心回顾性分析对《东京指南2018:急性胆囊炎治疗建议》的验证

Validation of the Tokyo guideline 2018 treatment proposal for acute cholecystitis from a single-center retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Bekki Tomoaki, Abe Tomoyuki, Amano Hironobu, Hanada Keiji, Kobayashi Tsuyoshi, Noriyuki Toshio, Ohdan Hideki, Nakahara Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/ases.12801. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1111/ases.12801
PMID:32285589
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The revised Tokyo guideline 2018 (TG18) recommends early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) who satisfy the Charlson Comorbidity Index criteria and the ASA Physical Status Classification (ASA-PS). Our study aims to determine the efficacy of the TG18 treatment strategy.

METHODS

We enrolled 324 patients who had been diagnosed with AC according to the TG18 and who underwent cholecystectomy between 2010 and 2018. Perioperative variables and surgical outcomes were analyzed according to the TG18 treatment strategy and severity grading.

RESULTS

The Charlson Comorbidity Index and ASA-PS scores were significantly higher in patients with Grade II and Grade III AC than in those with Grade I AC. In patients with a higher severity grading, LC failed, necessitating blood transfusion and bailout surgery. Among patients treated by the TG18 strategy were a higher proportion with Grade I or II AC; their ASA-PS scores were significantly lower than patients with Grade III AC. Compared to patients not treated by the TG18 strategy, this group demonstrated significant differences in the achievement of LC, bailout surgery, postoperative hospital stays, and 90-day mortality rates. Intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion were significantly higher in those not treated by the TG18 strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the TG18 treatment strategy is well-designed and efficacious. Given the high rate of blood transfusion and conversion surgery in treatment strategies other that TG18, special attention should be paid when selecting the optimal treatment strategy.

摘要

引言

修订后的《2018年东京指南》(TG18)建议,对于符合查尔森合并症指数标准和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类(ASA-PS)的急性胆囊炎(AC)患者,应尽早进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。我们的研究旨在确定TG18治疗策略的疗效。

方法

我们纳入了324例根据TG18诊断为AC且在2010年至2018年间接受胆囊切除术的患者。根据TG18治疗策略和严重程度分级分析围手术期变量和手术结果。

结果

II级和III级AC患者的查尔森合并症指数和ASA-PS评分显著高于I级AC患者。在严重程度分级较高的患者中,LC失败,需要输血和补救手术。在接受TG18策略治疗的患者中,I级或II级AC患者的比例更高;他们的ASA-PS评分显著低于III级AC患者。与未采用TG18策略治疗的患者相比,该组在LC完成情况、补救手术、术后住院时间和90天死亡率方面存在显著差异。未采用TG18策略治疗的患者术中失血量和输血量显著更高。

结论

我们的研究表明,TG18治疗策略设计合理且有效。鉴于TG18以外的治疗策略中输血和中转手术的发生率较高,在选择最佳治疗策略时应特别注意。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Tokyo guideline 2018 treatment proposal for acute cholecystitis from a single-center retrospective analysis.基于单中心回顾性分析对《东京指南2018:急性胆囊炎治疗建议》的验证
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jan;14(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/ases.12801. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
2
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎管理流程图。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
Evaluating the advantages of treating acute cholecystitis by following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18): a study emphasizing clinical outcomes and medical expenditures.评估遵循《2018年东京指南》(TG18)治疗急性胆囊炎的优势:一项强调临床结局和医疗支出的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6623-6632. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08162-7. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
4
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: Suitability of APACHE-II Score, ASA Grade, and Tokyo Guidelines 18 Grade as Predictors of Outcome in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与经皮胆囊造口术:APACHE-II 评分、ASA 分级和东京指南 18 分级作为急性胆囊炎患者结局预测因子的适用性。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2022 Jun 1;32(3):342-349. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001048.
5
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018: a prospective single-center study of 201 consecutive cases.2018 年东京指南指导下急性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性单中心连续 201 例病例研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6051-6061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10094-x. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for grade II or III acute cholecystitis.经皮经肝胆囊引流后腹腔镜胆囊次全切除术治疗 II 级或 III 级急性胆囊炎。
BMC Surg. 2021 Oct 30;21(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01387-w.
7
Preoperative difficulty factors in delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Tokyo Guidelines 2018 surgical difficulty score analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术延迟的术前困难因素:2018 年东京指南手术难度评分分析。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Apr;17(2):e13309. doi: 10.1111/ases.13309.
8
Clinical evaluation of a surgical difficulty score for laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis proposed in the Tokyo Guidelines 2018.2018 年东京指南中提出的腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎手术难度评分的临床评估。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023 May;30(5):625-632. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1258. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
9
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: surgical management of acute cholecystitis: safe steps in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (with videos).东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎的手术治疗:急性胆囊炎腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全步骤(附有视频)。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.517. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Tokyo Guidelines 2013 may be too restrictive and patients with moderate and severe acute cholecystitis can be managed by early cholecystectomy too.《2013东京指南》可能限制过多,中度和重度急性胆囊炎患者也可通过早期胆囊切除术进行治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2892-2900. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5300-4. Epub 2016 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Preemptive hydromorphone analgesia reduces postoperative delirium and stress response in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.超前应用氢吗啡酮镇痛可降低腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后谵妄及应激反应。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7427-7437. doi: 10.62347/HFRZ2901. eCollection 2024.
2
Association between serum endocan levels and organ failure in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化住院患者血清内脂素水平与器官衰竭之间的关联
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 26;19(12):e0315619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315619. eCollection 2024.
3
Outcome Predictors of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy As Definitive Versus Bridging Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis.
经皮胆囊造瘘术作为急性胆囊炎确定性治疗与过渡性治疗的结局预测因素
Cureus. 2023 Dec 5;15(12):e49962. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49962. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis following the Tokyo Guidelines 2018: a prospective single-center study of 201 consecutive cases.2018 年东京指南指导下急性胆囊炎早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性单中心连续 201 例病例研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6051-6061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10094-x. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
5
Charlson Comorbidity Index as a Predictor of Difficult Cholecystectomy in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis.查尔森合并症指数作为急性胆囊炎患者胆囊切除术难度的预测指标
Cureus. 2022 Nov 22;14(11):e31807. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31807. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Laparoscopic bailout surgery effective procedure for patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜抢救手术是治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术困难患者的有效方法。
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1611-1616. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01266-w. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
7
Mortality risk estimation in acute calculous cholecystitis: beyond the Tokyo Guidelines.急性结石性胆囊炎病死率评估:超越东京指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 May 11;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00368-x.
8
Aggressive Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Accordance with the Tokyo Guideline 2018.根据 2018 年东京指南行积极腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
JSLS. 2021 Jan-Mar;25(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00116.