Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory, Columbia University Medical Center, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute.
Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Glaucoma. 2020 Jun;29(6):429-434. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001487.
In this prospective cohort study, disc hemorrhages were associated with more severe central damage on 24-2 and 10-2 visual fields (VFs), and faster progression globally on 24-2 VFs and centrally on 10-2 VFs.
To study the relationship between disc hemorrhage (DH) and the presence and progression of glaucomatous central VF damage.
Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were performed on data from the African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES) cohort. Two masked investigators reviewed disc photographs for the presence and location of DH. 24-2 central VF damage was based on the number of test locations within the central 10 degrees of the 24-2 field pattern deviation and their mean total deviation (MTD). 10-2 central VF damage was based on pattern deviation and MTD. Main outcome measures were the association between DH and presence of central VF damage and between DH and worsening of VF.
DH was detected in 21 of 335 eyes (6.2%). In the cross-sectional analysis, DH was significantly associated with more severe central damage on 24-2 [incidence rate ratio=1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.02-2.12; P=0.035] and 10-2 VFs (incidence rate ratio=1.81; 95% CI=1.26-2.60; P=0.001). In the longitudinal analysis, DH eyes progressed faster than non-DH eyes based on 24-2 global MTD rates (difference in slopes, β=-0.06; 95% CI=-0.11 to -0.01; P=0.009) and 10-2 MTD rates (β=-0.10; 95% CI=-0.14 to -0.06; P< 0.001), but not 24-2 central MTD rates (β=-0.02; 95% CI=-0.078 to 0.026; P=0.338).
DH was associated with the presence and progression of central VF defects. DH identification should prompt intensive central VF monitoring and surveillance with 10-2 fields to detect progression.
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,盘状出血与 24-2 和 10-2 视野(VF)中更严重的中央损伤以及 24-2 VF 上的全球进展和 10-2 VF 上的中央进展有关。
研究盘状出血(DH)与青光眼中央 VF 损伤的存在和进展之间的关系。
对非洲裔美国人青光眼评估研究(ADAGES)队列的数据进行了横断面和纵向分析。两名掩蔽的研究人员审查了盘状照片,以确定 DH 的存在和位置。24-2 中央 VF 损伤基于中央 10 度内 24-2 视野模式偏差的测试位置数量及其平均总偏差(MTD)。10-2 中央 VF 损伤基于模式偏差和 MTD。主要观察指标为 DH 与中央 VF 损伤的存在和 VF 恶化之间的关系。
在 335 只眼中发现 21 只(6.2%)存在 DH。在横断面分析中,DH 与 24-2 [发病率比=1.47;95%置信区间(CI)=1.02-2.12;P=0.035]和 10-2 VF 上更严重的中央损伤显著相关。在纵向分析中,DH 眼的进展速度快于非 DH 眼,基于 24-2 全球 MTD 率(斜率差异,β=-0.06;95%CI=-0.11 至-0.01;P=0.009)和 10-2 MTD 率(β=-0.10;95%CI=-0.14 至-0.06;P<0.001),但 24-2 中央 MTD 率(β=-0.02;95%CI=-0.078 至 0.026;P=0.338)没有。
DH 与中央 VF 缺损的存在和进展有关。DH 的识别应促使使用 10-2 字段进行密集的中央 VF 监测和监测,以检测进展。