Alhaider S A, Alshehri H A, Al-Eid K
Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
College of Medicine, Al-Imam University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2014 Sep;1(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
Metered-dose inhalers plus spacers (MDI-spacer) are as effective as, or better than, nebulizers in aerosol delivery. The selection of aerosol delivery system for hospitalized children can have a significant impact on the utilization of healthcare resources.
A quality improvement project to evaluate the impact of conversion to MDI-spacer to administer bronchodilators (BDs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to hospitalized children on the utilization of hospital resources. The project was conducted in a tertiary pediatric ward from April to May 2013.
The project was conducted over a six-week period. In the first two weeks, data were gathered from all hospitalized children receiving BDs and/or ICSs by nebulizers. This data collection was followed by a two-week washout period during which training of healthcare providers and operational changes were implemented to enhance the conversion to MDI-spacer. In the last two weeks, data were gathered from hospitalized children after conversion to MDI-spacer. The primary outcomes included the mean time (in minutes) of medication preparation and delivery. Secondary outcomes included the following: need for respiratory therapy assistance, estimated cost of treatment sessions, and patient/caregiver satisfaction.
Five hundred seventy-five treatment sessions were enrolled (288 on nebulizers, 287 on MDI-spacer). The nebulizer group had more male predominance and were slightly older compared to the MDI-spacer group (male: 59% vs. 53% and mean age: 52 vs. 40 months respectively). The duration of treatment preparation and delivery was significantly lower in the MDI-spacer group (2 min reduction in preparation time and 5 min reduction in delivery time; < 0.01). Caregivers mastered MDI-spacer use after an average of two observed sessions, eliminating the need for respiratory therapy assistance during the hospital stay. Medication cost analysis showed savings in favor of MDI-spacer (cost reduction per 100 doses: 50% for albuterol, 30% for ipratropium bromide, and 87% for ICSs). The patient satisfaction survey showed "very good" to "excellent" levels in both groups.
Conversion to MDI-spacer for BDs and ICSs administration in hospitalized children improve hospital resource utilization.
定量吸入器加储雾罐(MDI-储雾罐)在气雾剂递送方面与雾化器效果相当或更佳。为住院儿童选择气雾剂递送系统会对医疗资源的利用产生重大影响。
一项质量改进项目,旨在评估将住院儿童使用的支气管扩张剂(BDs)和吸入性糖皮质激素(ICSs)的给药方式转换为MDI-储雾罐对医院资源利用的影响。该项目于2013年4月至5月在一家三级儿科病房开展。
该项目为期六周。在前两周,收集所有通过雾化器接受BDs和/或ICSs治疗的住院儿童的数据。在接下来为期两周的洗脱期,对医护人员进行培训并实施操作变更,以促进向MDI-储雾罐的转换。在最后两周,收集转换为MDI-储雾罐后住院儿童的数据。主要结局包括药物准备和给药的平均时间(分钟)。次要结局包括以下方面:呼吸治疗协助需求、每次治疗的估计费用以及患者/照顾者满意度。
共纳入575次治疗(288次使用雾化器,287次使用MDI-储雾罐)。与MDI-储雾罐组相比,雾化器组男性占比更高且年龄稍大(男性:59%对53%,平均年龄:分别为52个月和40个月)。MDI-储雾罐组的治疗准备和给药时间显著更短(准备时间减少2分钟,给药时间减少5分钟;P<0.01)。照顾者平均经过两次观察性操作后就能掌握MDI-储雾罐的使用方法,住院期间无需呼吸治疗协助。药物成本分析显示使用MDI-储雾罐更节省费用(每100剂的成本降低:沙丁胺醇为50%,异丙托溴铵为30%,ICSs为87%)。患者满意度调查显示两组均处于“非常好”到“优秀”水平。
住院儿童使用BDs和ICSs时转换为MDI-储雾罐可提高医院资源利用率。