Nimgaonkar V L, Farrell M P
Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London.
Child Care Health Dev. 1988 Nov-Dec;14(6):387-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1988.tb00590.x.
A consecutive group of children (n = 19) referred to a child guidance clinic who failed to attend an initial interview were followed-up. These 'non-attenders' did not differ from a matched group of 'attenders' with respect to duration or nature of their problems, waiting period for the appointment, type of referring agencies or socio-demographic variables, but were more likely to be living with their natural parents. Disinclination among the parents was the main reason for absenteeism and could be related to ignorance about the clinic. The problems leading to referral persisted in most cases and had not received further treatment.
对连续一组转介到儿童指导诊所但未参加初次面谈的儿童(n = 19)进行了随访。这些“未就诊者”在问题的持续时间或性质、预约等待时间、转介机构类型或社会人口统计学变量方面,与一组匹配的“就诊者”没有差异,但更有可能与亲生父母同住。父母的不情愿是缺勤的主要原因,可能与对诊所的无知有关。在大多数情况下,导致转介的问题仍然存在,且未得到进一步治疗。