• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与研究相关的基因检测结果的反馈及对基因歧视的担忧:不同群体参与基因研究的促进因素和障碍

Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups.

作者信息

Burnett-Hartman Andrea N, Blum-Barnett Erica, Carroll Nikki M, Madrid Sarah D, Jonas Cabell, Janes Kristen, Alvarado Monica, Bedoy Ruth, Paolino Valerie, Aziz Nazneen, McGlynn Elizabeth A

机构信息

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA,

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Genomics. 2020;23(1-2):59-68. doi: 10.1159/000507056. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1159/000507056
PMID:32289795
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most genetics studies lack the diversity necessary to ensure that all groups benefit from genetic research.

OBJECTIVES

To explore facilitators and barriers to genetic research participation.

METHODS

We conducted a survey on genetics in research and healthcare from November 15, 2017 to February 28, 2018 among adult Kaiser Permanente (KP) members who had been invited to participate in the KP biobank (KP Research Bank). We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing the willingness to participate in genetic research under different return of results scenarios and genetic discrimination concerns between groups, according to their demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 57,331 KP members were invited to participate, and 10,369 completed the survey (18% response rate). Respondents were 65% female, 44% non-Hispanic White (NH White), 22% Asian/Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (Asian/PI), 19% non-Hispanic Black (NH Black), and 16% Hispanic. Respondents willing to participate in genetic research ranged from 22% with no results returned to 87% if health-related genetic results were returned. We also found variation by race/ethnicity; when no results were to be returned, Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks were less likely to want to participate than NH Whites (p < 0.05). However, when results were returned, disparities in the willingness to participate disappeared for NH Blacks and Hispanics. Genetic discrimination concerns were more prevalent in Asian/PIs, Hispanics, and NH Blacks than in NH Whites (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Policies that prohibit the return of results and do not address genetic discrimination concerns may contribute to a greater underrepresentation of diverse groups in genetic research.

摘要

背景

大多数遗传学研究缺乏必要的多样性,以确保所有群体都能从基因研究中受益。

目的

探讨参与基因研究的促进因素和障碍。

方法

2017年11月15日至2018年2月28日,我们对受邀参与凯撒医疗集团(KP)生物样本库(KP研究库)的成年KP成员进行了一项关于研究和医疗保健领域遗传学的调查。我们使用逻辑回归计算调整后的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),根据不同的人口统计学特征,比较不同结果反馈方案下参与基因研究的意愿以及不同群体之间对基因歧视的担忧。

结果

共有57331名KP成员受邀参与,10369人完成了调查(回复率为18%)。受访者中65%为女性,44%为非西班牙裔白人(NH白人),22%为亚洲人/夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民(亚洲人/太平洋岛民),19%为非西班牙裔黑人(NH黑人),16%为西班牙裔。愿意参与基因研究的受访者比例从无结果反馈时的22%到有健康相关基因结果反馈时的87%不等。我们还发现了种族/民族差异;当不反馈结果时,亚洲人/太平洋岛民、西班牙裔和NH黑人比NH白人更不愿意参与(p<0.05)。然而,当反馈结果时,NH黑人和西班牙裔参与意愿的差异消失了。对基因歧视的担忧在亚洲人/太平洋岛民、西班牙裔和NH黑人中比在NH白人中更为普遍(p<0.05)。

结论

禁止反馈结果且未解决基因歧视担忧的政策可能会导致不同群体在基因研究中的代表性更低。

相似文献

1
Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups.与研究相关的基因检测结果的反馈及对基因歧视的担忧:不同群体参与基因研究的促进因素和障碍
Public Health Genomics. 2020;23(1-2):59-68. doi: 10.1159/000507056. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
Racial and ethnic differences in willingness to participate in psychiatric genetic research.参与精神疾病基因研究意愿方面的种族和民族差异。
Psychiatr Genet. 2009 Aug;19(4):186-94. doi: 10.1097/ypg.0b013e32832cec89.
3
Multiple Sclerosis Mortality by Race/Ethnicity, Age, Sex, and Time Period in the United States, 1999-2015.美国 1999-2015 年按种族/民族、年龄、性别和时间段划分的多发性硬化症死亡率。
Neuroepidemiology. 2018;50(1-2):35-40. doi: 10.1159/000484213. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Demographic and Health Behavior Factors Associated With Clinical Trial Invitation and Participation in the United States.与临床试验邀请和参与相关的人口统计学和健康行为因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27792.
5
Demographic differences in the utilization of clinical and direct-to-consumer genetic testing.临床和直接面向消费者的基因检测利用中的人口统计学差异。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Aug;29(4):634-643. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1193. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
6
"A Gift to My Family for Their Future": Attitudes about Genetic Research Participation.“给我家人未来的一份礼物”:对参与基因研究的态度
Public Health Genomics. 2022 May 11:1-10. doi: 10.1159/000524462.
7
The role of race and ethnicity in views toward and participation in genetic studies and precision medicine research in the United States: A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.种族和民族在美国对基因研究和精准医学研究的看法和参与中的作用:定性和定量研究的系统评价。
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020 Feb;8(2):e1099. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1099. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
8
Participation in cancer clinical trials: why are patients not participating?参与癌症临床试验:患者为何不参与?
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):116-26. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13497264. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
Associations between race and ethnicity and receipt of advice about alcohol use in the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部中种族和族裔与饮酒建议接受情况之间的关联。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 May;60(5):663-70. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.5.663.
10
Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.公众对参与医学研究的意愿所持的态度。
J Health Soc Policy. 2000;12(2):23-43. doi: 10.1300/J045v12n02_02.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Genetics in Early-Onset Cardiovascular Disease.遗传学在早发性心血管疾病中的作用。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):e85988. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85988. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Perspectives of Research Ethics Committees on the Challenges of Human Genomic Research Participation in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚研究伦理委员会对人类基因组研究参与挑战的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Jul;20(3):162-174. doi: 10.1177/15562646251339221. Epub 2025 May 13.
3
Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions.
患者对使用多基因风险评分进行个性化风险沟通以指导结直肠癌筛查决策的看法。
AJPM Focus. 2024 Dec 4;4(1):100308. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100308. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Barriers, motivators and strategies to increase participation in genetic research among Asian and Black families of autistic individuals.自闭症个体的亚裔和黑人家庭增加参与基因研究的障碍、动机和策略。
J Community Genet. 2024 Oct;15(5):559-572. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00724-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
A proposal for an inclusive working definition of genetic discrimination to promote a more coherent debate.一个包容性的遗传歧视工作定义的提案,以促进更连贯的辩论。
Nat Genet. 2024 Jul;56(7):1339-1345. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01786-8. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Views of adults living with sickle cell disease on the theoretical return of secondary genomic findings.镰状细胞病患者对二次基因组检测结果可能返回的看法。
Genet Med. 2024 Jan;26(1):100993. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100993. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
7
Returning Individual Research Results from Digital Phenotyping in Psychiatry.精神医学中数字化表型研究的个体研究结果回报。
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Feb;24(2):69-90. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2180109. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.使用大规模或全基因组测序进行基因组研究的结果回报:迈向新常态。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:393-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
Attitude Disparity and Worrying Scenarios in Genetic Discrimination-Based on Questionnaires from China.基于中国问卷调查的基因歧视中的态度差异与令人担忧的情形
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;11(2):188. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020188.
10
Promoting Inclusive Recruitment: a Qualitative Study of Black Adults' Decision to Participate in Genetic Research.促进包容性招募:一项关于黑人成年人参与遗传研究决策的定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2022 Oct;99(5):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00664-0. Epub 2022 Jul 25.