• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次激励性讲座可促进适度体重减轻:一项随机对照试验。

A Single Motivational Lecture Can Promote Modest Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Nakata Yoshio, Sasai Hiroyuki, Tsujimoto Takehiko, Hashimoto Koichi, Kobayashi Hiroyuki

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan,

Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Obes Facts. 2020;13(2):267-278. doi: 10.1159/000506813. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1159/000506813
PMID:32289804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7250339/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a public health problem worldwide. To widely disseminate weight-loss interventions across the target population, a cost-effective approach is needed.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to test whether a single motivational lecture could promote weight loss.

METHODS

Our study was a 3-month randomized controlled trial, and we recruited participants via local newspaper advertisements in 3 cities in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan, and randomly assigned them to a control group (no intervention) and an intervention group, who attended a single motivational lecture lasting approximately 2 h. No other lectures or textbooks were provided. The eligibility criteria included an age of 40-64 years, a body mass index (BMI) of 25-40 kg/m2, and the presence of at least 1 component of metabolic syndrome. The primary outcome was body weight change at 3 months.

RESULTS

We enrolled 145 eligible participants with a mean age of 53.8 ± 7.1 years and a BMI of 28.5 ± 3.1 kg/m2. The 3-month body weight change in the control and intervention groups was -0.65 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.09 to -0.20) and -2.48 kg (95% CI -3.01 to -1.95), respectively. The between-group difference was 1.83 kg (95% CI 1.15-2.51).

CONCLUSIONS

The significant difference suggested that a single motivational lecture is an effective option to promote modest weight loss in the short term.

摘要

背景

肥胖是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。为了在目标人群中广泛传播减肥干预措施,需要一种具有成本效益的方法。

目的

我们旨在测试单次激励讲座是否能促进体重减轻。

方法

我们的研究是一项为期3个月的随机对照试验,通过在日本茨城县3个城市的当地报纸广告招募参与者,并将他们随机分为对照组(无干预)和干预组,干预组参加一次持续约2小时的激励讲座。未提供其他讲座或教材。纳入标准包括年龄40 - 64岁、体重指数(BMI)为25 - 40 kg/m²以及至少存在一种代谢综合征成分。主要结局是3个月时的体重变化。

结果

我们招募了145名符合条件的参与者,平均年龄为53.8 ± 7.1岁,BMI为28.5 ± 3.1 kg/m²。对照组和干预组3个月时的体重变化分别为 -0.65 kg(95%置信区间[CI] -1.09至 -0.20)和 -2.48 kg(95%CI -3.01至 -1.95)。组间差异为1.83 kg(95%CI 1.15 - 2.51)。

结论

显著差异表明,单次激励讲座是短期内促进适度体重减轻的有效选择。

相似文献

1
A Single Motivational Lecture Can Promote Modest Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial.一次激励性讲座可促进适度体重减轻:一项随机对照试验。
Obes Facts. 2020;13(2):267-278. doi: 10.1159/000506813. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
Web-based intervention to promote weight-loss maintenance using an activity monitor: A randomized controlled trial.使用活动监测器促进体重减轻维持的基于网络的干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Mar 4;14:100839. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100839. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Social Incentives and Gamification to Promote Weight Loss: The LOSE IT Randomized, Controlled Trial.社会激励和游戏化促进减肥:LOSE IT 随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1669-1675. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4552-1. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
4
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
5
6
Motivational interviewing to improve weight loss in overweight and/or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.动机性访谈对超重和/或肥胖患者减肥效果的影响:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2011 Sep;12(9):709-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00892.x. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
7
Functional imagery training versus motivational interviewing for weight loss: a randomised controlled trial of brief individual interventions for overweight and obesity.功能性影像训练与动机性访谈在减肥中的应用:一项针对超重和肥胖的简短个体干预的随机对照试验。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Apr;43(4):883-894. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0122-1. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Online platform for healthy weight loss in adults with overweight and obesity - the "POEmaS" project: a randomized controlled trial.在线平台辅助超重和肥胖成年人健康减重 - "POEmaS" 项目:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 1;18(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5882-y.
9
Effect of Weight Loss via Severe vs Moderate Energy Restriction on Lean Mass and Body Composition Among Postmenopausal Women With Obesity: The TEMPO Diet Randomized Clinical Trial.严重与适度能量限制对肥胖绝经后妇女瘦体重和身体成分的减肥效果:TEMPO 饮食随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913733. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13733.
10
Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial.可穿戴技术联合生活方式干预对长期体重减轻的影响:IDEA随机临床试验
JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1161-1171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12858.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Effects of the Use of a Step Count-Specific Smartphone App on Physical Activity and Weight Loss: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.使用计步特定智能手机应用程序对身体活动和减肥的长期影响:随机对照临床试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Oct 24;10(10):e35628. doi: 10.2196/35628.
2
Efficacy of Additional Intervention to the Specific Health Guidance in Japan: The Takahata GENKI Project.日本特定健康指导附加干预措施的效果:高幡元气项目
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Sep 21;14:3935-3943. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S323444. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Rationale and Descriptive Analysis of Specific Health Guidance: the Nationwide Lifestyle Intervention Program Targeting Metabolic Syndrome in Japan.理由和具体健康指导的描述性分析:日本针对代谢综合征的全国生活方式干预计划。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Apr 1;25(4):308-322. doi: 10.5551/jat.42010. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
2
A brief intervention for weight control based on habit-formation theory delivered through primary care: results from a randomised controlled trial.通过初级保健提供的基于习惯形成理论的体重控制简短干预措施:一项随机对照试验的结果
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Feb;41(2):246-254. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.206. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
3
Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: a parallel, two-arm, randomised trial.基层医疗中肥胖症的筛查与简短干预:一项平行双臂随机试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2492-2500. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31893-1. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
4
Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19·2 million participants.1975年至2014年200个国家成人身体质量指数的趋势:对1698项基于人群测量研究的汇总分析,涉及1920万参与者。
Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1377-1396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30054-X.
5
Weight change among people randomized to minimal intervention control groups in weight loss trials.减肥试验中随机分配到最小干预对照组的人群的体重变化。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Apr;24(4):772-80. doi: 10.1002/oby.21255.
6
Monitoring Obesity Trends in Health Japan 21.监测“健康日本21”中的肥胖趋势。
J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2015;61 Suppl:S17-9. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.61.S17.
7
Weight loss maintenance for 2 years after a 6-month randomised controlled trial comparing education-only and group-based support in Japanese adults.在一项针对日本成年人的为期6个月的随机对照试验中,比较仅接受教育和基于小组的支持措施,之后进行了为期2年的体重减轻维持情况研究。
Obes Facts. 2014;7(6):376-87. doi: 10.1159/000369913. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Three percent weight reduction is the minimum requirement to improve health hazards in obese and overweight people in Japan.体重减轻3%是改善日本肥胖和超重人群健康危害的最低要求。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;8(5):e466-75. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
9
Efficiency of a free-living physical activity promotion program following diet modification for fat loss in Japanese obese men.
J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2012;58(6):384-92. doi: 10.3177/jnsv.58.384.
10
Comparison of range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: lighten Up randomised controlled trial.比较商业或初级保健主导的减肥项目与最小干预对照组在肥胖人群中的减肥效果:Ligten Up 随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 3;343:d6500. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6500.