Bellucci Devis, Veronesi Elena, Dominici Massimo, Cannillo Valeria
Department of Engineering "Enzo Ferrari", University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via P. Vivarelli 10, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children & Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Hospital of Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 12;13(8):1816. doi: 10.3390/ma13081816.
In this work, a new 3D cellular model-based on human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs)-was used for the first time to test the 45S5 Bioglass (45S5). Such a model, previously used to evaluate the biologic performance of two novel bioactive glasses, suggested out the regenerative potential of such materials. In fact, BM-MSCs were able both to adhere and colonize the biomaterials, as well as differentiate toward osteoblasts-even in absence of specific growth factors. Surprisingly, BM-MSCs were not able to colonize 45S5 granules (almost no adhesion and/or colonization was observed), and thus, were not capable of providing any osteogenic differentiation. Therefore, the model seems to suggest that the two novel bioactive glasses have a better biologic performance than 45S5. If this hypothesis is confirmed also by in vivo tests, the 3D model may become a predictive tool for discriminating between different potential bioactive materials by comparatively evaluating them, and preliminarily selecting the best ones in relation to their biocompatibility potential-before proceeding with further experiments in vivo. This approach could favor the reduction of costs and time of pre-clinical and clinical trials.
在这项工作中,首次使用了一种基于人骨髓间充质干细胞(BM-MSCs)的新型三维细胞模型来测试45S5生物活性玻璃(45S5)。这种模型先前用于评估两种新型生物活性玻璃的生物学性能,显示出此类材料的再生潜力。事实上,即使在没有特定生长因子的情况下,BM-MSCs既能粘附并在生物材料上定植,也能向成骨细胞分化。令人惊讶的是,BM-MSCs无法在45S5颗粒上定植(几乎未观察到粘附和/或定植),因此,无法进行任何成骨分化。因此,该模型似乎表明这两种新型生物活性玻璃比45S5具有更好的生物学性能。如果这一假设也得到体内试验的证实,那么该三维模型可能会成为一种预测工具,通过比较评估不同潜在生物活性材料,并在进行进一步体内实验之前,根据其生物相容性潜力初步筛选出最佳材料,从而区分不同的潜在生物活性材料。这种方法可能有助于降低临床前和临床试验的成本和时间。