Dombrowski Amanda W, Gesmundo Nathan J, Aguirre Ana L, Sarris Katerina A, Young Jonathon M, Bogdan Andrew R, Martin M Cynthia, Gedeon Shasline, Wang Ying
AbbVie, Inc., 1 North Waukegan Road, North Chicago, Illinois 60064, United States.
Northwestern University Center for Molecular Innovation and Drug Discovery, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States.
ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020 Mar 23;11(4):597-604. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00093. eCollection 2020 Apr 9.
Despite recent advances in the field of C(sp)-C(sp) cross-couplings and the accompanying increase in publications, it can be hard to determine which method is appropriate for a given reaction when using the highly functionalized intermediates prevalent in medicinal chemistry. Thus a study was done comparing the ability of seven methods to directly install a diverse set of alkyl groups on "drug-like" aryl structures via parallel library synthesis. Each method showed substrates that it excelled at coupling compared with the other methods. When analyzing the reactions run across all of the methods, a reaction success rate of 50% was achieved. Whereas this is promising, there are still gaps in the scope of direct C(sp)-C(sp) coupling methods, like tertiary group installation. The results reported herein should be used to inform future syntheses, assess reaction scope, and encourage medicinal chemists to expand their synthetic toolbox.
尽管最近C(sp) - C(sp)交叉偶联领域取得了进展,相关出版物也随之增加,但在使用药物化学中普遍存在的高官能化中间体时,很难确定哪种方法适用于特定反应。因此,开展了一项研究,比较了七种方法通过平行库合成在“类药物”芳基结构上直接引入多种烷基的能力。与其他方法相比,每种方法都显示出其在偶联某些底物方面表现出色。在分析所有方法进行的反应时,反应成功率达到了50%。虽然这很有前景,但直接C(sp) - C(sp)偶联方法的适用范围仍存在差距,如叔基的引入。本文报道的结果应用于指导未来的合成、评估反应范围,并鼓励药物化学家扩展他们的合成工具箱。