• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性呼吸衰竭基于规则的队列定义:电子表型算法

Rule-Based Cohort Definitions for Acute Respiratory Failure: Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm.

作者信息

Essay Patrick, Mosier Jarrod, Subbian Vignesh

机构信息

College of Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Apr 15;8(4):e18402. doi: 10.2196/18402.

DOI:10.2196/18402
PMID:32293579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7191347/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory failure is generally treated with invasive mechanical ventilation or noninvasive respiratory support strategies. The efficacies of the various strategies are not fully understood. There is a need for accurate therapy-based phenotyping for secondary analyses of electronic health record data to answer research questions regarding respiratory management and outcomes with each strategy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to address knowledge gaps related to ventilation therapy strategies across diverse patient populations by developing an algorithm for accurate identification of patients with acute respiratory failure. To accomplish this objective, our goal was to develop rule-based computable phenotypes for patients with acute respiratory failure using remotely monitored intensive care unit (tele-ICU) data. This approach permits analyses by ventilation strategy across broad patient populations of interest with the ability to sub-phenotype as research questions require.

METHODS

Tele-ICU data from ≥200 hospitals were used to create a rule-based algorithm for phenotyping patients with acute respiratory failure, defined as an adult patient requiring invasive mechanical ventilation or a noninvasive strategy. The dataset spans a wide range of hospitals and ICU types across all US regions. Structured clinical data, including ventilation therapy start and stop times, medication records, and nurse and respiratory therapy charts, were used to define clinical phenotypes. All adult patients of any diagnoses with record of ventilation therapy were included. Patients were categorized by ventilation type, and analysis of event sequences using record timestamps defined each phenotype. Manual validation was performed on 5% of patients in each phenotype.

RESULTS

We developed 7 phenotypes: (0) invasive mechanical ventilation, (1) noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, (2) high-flow nasal insufflation, (3) noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation subsequently requiring intubation, (4) high-flow nasal insufflation subsequently requiring intubation, (5) invasive mechanical ventilation with extubation to noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, and (6) invasive mechanical ventilation with extubation to high-flow nasal insufflation. A total of 27,734 patients met our phenotype criteria and were categorized into these ventilation subgroups. Manual validation of a random selection of 5% of records from each phenotype resulted in a total accuracy of 88% and a precision and recall of 0.8789 and 0.8785, respectively, across all phenotypes. Individual phenotype validation showed that the algorithm categorizes patients particularly well but has challenges with patients that require ≥2 management strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed computable phenotyping algorithm for patients with acute respiratory failure effectively identifies patients for therapy-focused research regardless of admission diagnosis or comorbidities and allows for management strategy comparisons across populations of interest.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c40a/7191347/8e56689a43c2/medinform_v8i4e18402_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c40a/7191347/77d2b75bc637/medinform_v8i4e18402_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c40a/7191347/c689205a2c92/medinform_v8i4e18402_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c40a/7191347/8e56689a43c2/medinform_v8i4e18402_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c40a/7191347/77d2b75bc637/medinform_v8i4e18402_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c40a/7191347/c689205a2c92/medinform_v8i4e18402_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c40a/7191347/8e56689a43c2/medinform_v8i4e18402_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

急性呼吸衰竭一般采用有创机械通气或无创呼吸支持策略进行治疗。各种策略的疗效尚未完全明确。需要基于准确治疗方法的表型分析来对电子健康记录数据进行二次分析,以回答有关每种策略的呼吸管理及预后的研究问题。

目的

本研究的目的是通过开发一种用于准确识别急性呼吸衰竭患者的算法,来填补不同患者群体在通气治疗策略方面的知识空白。为实现这一目标,我们的目的是利用远程监测重症监护病房(远程ICU)的数据,为急性呼吸衰竭患者开发基于规则的可计算表型。这种方法允许根据通气策略对广泛感兴趣的患者群体进行分析,并能够根据研究问题的需要进行亚表型分析。

方法

使用来自≥200家医院的远程ICU数据创建一种基于规则的算法,用于对急性呼吸衰竭患者进行表型分析,急性呼吸衰竭定义为需要有创机械通气或无创策略的成年患者。该数据集涵盖了美国所有地区的广泛医院及ICU类型。结构化临床数据,包括通气治疗开始和停止时间、用药记录以及护士和呼吸治疗图表,用于定义临床表型。纳入所有有通气治疗记录的任何诊断的成年患者。根据通气类型对患者进行分类,并使用记录时间戳对事件序列进行分析来定义每种表型。对每种表型中5%的患者进行人工验证。

结果

我们开发了7种表型:(0)有创机械通气,(1)无创正压通气,(2)高流量鼻导管吸氧,(3)随后需要插管的无创正压通气,(4)随后需要插管的高流量鼻导管吸氧,(5)有创机械通气拔管后改为无创正压通气,以及(6)有创机械通气拔管后改为高流量鼻导管吸氧。共有27734名患者符合我们的表型标准,并被分类到这些通气亚组中。对每种表型随机抽取5%的记录进行人工验证,所有表型的总准确率为88%,精确率和召回率分别为0.8789和0.8785。个体表型验证表明,该算法对患者的分类效果特别好,但对于需要≥2种管理策略的患者存在挑战。

结论

我们提出的用于急性呼吸衰竭患者的可计算表型算法能够有效地识别适合以治疗为重点研究的患者,无论其入院诊断或合并症如何,并允许对感兴趣的人群的管理策略进行比较。

相似文献

1
Rule-Based Cohort Definitions for Acute Respiratory Failure: Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm.急性呼吸衰竭基于规则的队列定义:电子表型算法
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Apr 15;8(4):e18402. doi: 10.2196/18402.
2
Validation of an Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm for Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.急性呼吸衰竭患者电子表型算法的验证
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 1;4(3):e0645. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000645. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
Phenotyping COVID-19 Patients by Ventilation Therapy: Data Quality Challenges and Cohort Characterization.通过通气治疗对COVID-19患者进行表型分析:数据质量挑战与队列特征描述
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:198-202. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210148.
4
Rule-Based Cohort Definitions for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Computable Phenotyping Strategy Based on the Berlin Definition.急性呼吸窘迫综合征基于规则的队列定义:一种基于柏林定义的可计算表型分析策略
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jun 11;3(6):e0451. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000451. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation in the Treatment of Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.高流速鼻内吹氧治疗呼吸衰竭:一项随机临床试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;72(1):73-83.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
6
Noninvasive vs Invasive Respiratory Support for Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure.急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的无创与有创呼吸支持
medRxiv. 2023 Dec 28:2023.12.23.23300368. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.23.23300368.
7
Outcomes in Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Secondary to COVID-19 Treated with Noninvasive Respiratory Support versus Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.新型冠状病毒肺炎继发急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者接受无创呼吸支持与有创机械通气治疗的结果比较
medRxiv. 2022 Dec 20:2022.12.19.22283704. doi: 10.1101/2022.12.19.22283704.
8
[Study of timing of invasive and noninvasive sequential ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome].[急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者有创与无创序贯通气时机的研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 May;26(5):330-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.05.009.
9
Noninvasive versus invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure in patients with hematologic malignancies: a 5-year multicenter observational survey.血液恶性肿瘤患者急性呼吸衰竭的无创与有创通气:一项 5 年多中心观察性调查。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2232-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182227a27.
10
[Ten-year evolution of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure in the hematogical patient admitted to the intensive care unit].[入住重症监护病房的血液病患者急性呼吸衰竭机械通气的十年演变]
Med Intensiva. 2013 Oct;37(7):452-60. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Lightweight Language Models are Prone to Reasoning Errors for Complex Computational Phenotyping Tasks.轻量级语言模型在复杂的计算表型分析任务中容易出现推理错误。
ArXiv. 2025 Jul 30:arXiv:2507.23146v1.
2
SHREC: A Framework for Advancing Next-Generation Computational Phenotyping with Large Language Models.SHREC:一个利用大语言模型推进下一代计算表型分析的框架。
ArXiv. 2025 Jul 17:arXiv:2506.16359v3.
3
Derivation and validation of generalized sepsis-induced acute respiratory failure phenotypes among critically ill patients: a retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
High-Flow Oxygen Therapy Concepts: Time to Standardize Nomenclature and Avoid Confusion.高流量氧疗理念:是时候规范命名,避免混淆了。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;35(5):519-523. doi: 10.1177/0885066620908243. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
New modalities for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: A review article.无创正压通气的新方式:一篇综述文章。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2019 Winter;10(1):1-6. doi: 10.22088/cjim.10.1.1.
3
The Connected Intensive Care Unit Patient: Exploratory Analyses and Cohort Discovery From a Critical Care Telemedicine Database.
危重症患者中广义脓毒症诱导的急性呼吸衰竭表型的推导与验证:一项回顾性研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Oct 1;28(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05061-4.
4
Noninvasive vs invasive respiratory support for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.无创与有创呼吸支持治疗急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0307849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307849. eCollection 2024.
5
Derivation and Validation of Generalized Sepsis-induced Acute Respiratory Failure Phenotypes Among Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study.重症患者中广义脓毒症诱导的急性呼吸衰竭表型的推导与验证:一项回顾性研究。
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 30:rs.3.rs-4307475. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4307475/v1.
6
Acute Respiratory Failure From Early Pandemic COVID-19: Noninvasive Respiratory Support vs Mechanical Ventilation.早期大流行新冠病毒所致急性呼吸衰竭:无创呼吸支持与机械通气的比较
CHEST Crit Care. 2024 Mar;2(1). doi: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2023.100030. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
7
"Electronic Phenotyping" Antimicrobials to Facilitate Outpatient Stewardship for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant.“电子表型分析”抗菌药物助力肾移植受者无症状菌尿症和尿路感染的门诊管理
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 14;11(3):ofae119. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae119. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Predicting Failure of Noninvasive Respiratory Support Using Deep Recurrent Learning.使用深度递归学习预测无创呼吸支持失败。
Respir Care. 2023 Apr;68(4):488-496. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10382. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
9
Validation of an Electronic Phenotyping Algorithm for Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.急性呼吸衰竭患者电子表型算法的验证
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 1;4(3):e0645. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000645. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
ARDS in COVID-19 and beyond: Let's keep our eyes on the goal instead of the straw man.新型冠状病毒肺炎及其他情况下的急性呼吸窘迫综合征:让我们着眼于目标而非稻草人。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2021 Nov;22(4):267-269. doi: 10.1177/1751143720973527. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
联网重症监护病房患者:来自重症监护远程医疗数据库的探索性分析与队列发现
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jan 24;7(1):e13006. doi: 10.2196/13006.
4
Effect of vocabulary mapping for conditions on phenotype cohorts.条件词汇映射对表型队列的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Dec 1;25(12):1618-1625. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy124.
5
The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research.eICU 协作研究数据库,一个免费的多中心重症监护研究数据库。
Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178.
6
Predictors of noninvasive ventilation failure in critically ill obese patients: a brief narrative review.危重症肥胖患者无创通气失败的预测因素:简要叙述性综述
Adv Respir Med. 2017;85(5):264-270. doi: 10.5603/ARM.a2017.0044. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
High-fidelity phenotyping: richness and freedom from bias.高保真表型分析:丰富性与无偏性
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Mar 1;25(3):289-294. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx110.
8
The comparative effectiveness of noninvasive and invasive ventilation in patients with pneumonia.无创通气与有创通气在肺炎患者中的比较效果。
J Crit Care. 2018 Feb;43:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 23.
9
Risk Factors for Noninvasive Ventilation Failure in Critically Ill Subjects With Confirmed Influenza Infection.确诊流感感染的重症患者无创通气失败的危险因素。
Respir Care. 2017 Oct;62(10):1307-1315. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05481. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
Outcomes of Noninvasive and Invasive Ventilation in Patients Hospitalized with Asthma Exacerbation.哮喘急性加重住院患者无创通气和有创通气的治疗结果
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Jul;13(7):1096-104. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201510-701OC.