University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Nam J. Herdu 2, SK-91701, Trnava, Slovak Republic.
University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Nam J. Herdu 2, SK-91701, Trnava, Slovak Republic.
J Biotechnol. 2020 May 20;314-315:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 12.
Spruce bark represents a reservoir of bioactive compounds. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of independent variables (temperature, liquid to solid ratio, time and methanol content) and their interaction within the extraction process by the response surface methodology (RSM). The effect of conventional (solvent extraction; SE) and modern (ultrasound-assisted extraction; UAE) methods for the extraction of antioxidants (antioxidant capacity; AC) and polyphenols (total polyphenol content; TPC) was compared. Maximum yields of AC and TPC by SE and UAE were obtained at modified optimal conditions of 63 °C, methanol content of 53 % (v/v) and 38 mL of extraction solvent per gram of dry material. Two-step extraction process consisting of the fast washing and slow diffusion steps was suitable described by Peleg and Patricelli mathematic models. The HPLC fingerprints of both extracts did not show significant differences while the content of phenolic compounds extracted by UAE was 1.1- to 7.1-times higher than that obtained by SE, quantified by HPLC.
云杉树皮是生物活性化合物的重要来源。本研究旨在通过响应面法(RSM)考察温度、液固比、时间和甲醇含量等独立变量及其相互作用对提取过程的影响。比较了传统(溶剂提取;SE)和现代(超声辅助提取;UAE)方法提取抗氧化剂(抗氧化能力;AC)和多酚(总多酚含量;TPC)的效果。在 SE 和 UAE 的最佳修正条件下(63°C、53%(v/v)甲醇含量和 38mL 提取溶剂/克干物质),获得了 AC 和 TPC 的最大产率。两步提取过程包括快速洗涤和缓慢扩散步骤,适合用 Peleg 和 Patricelli 数学模型来描述。两种提取物的 HPLC 指纹图谱没有明显差异,而 UAE 提取的酚类化合物含量比 SE 提取的含量高 1.1 到 7.1 倍,通过 HPLC 定量。