Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.
Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais(UEMG). Passos, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2020 Apr 9;41:e20190182. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190182. eCollection 2020.
To identify in the literature methods and techniques of debriefing used in teaching and learning in nursing simulation.
Integrative review of PubMed/MEDLINE®, LILACS, Scopus and CINAHL® databases, with the descriptors "nursing", "nursing education", respective terms in English and Spanish, and the keyword "debriefing". Twelve primary studies, in Portuguese, English and Spanish, from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. Qualitative analysis was used to categorize the domains.
The identified meaningful learning methods were based on principles of transfer of learning; model of clinical reasoning, interprofessional, with good judgment and structured and self-debriefing techniques, oral, eye-tracking, video-assisted and written debriefing.
The structured method and the oral technique with video were outstanding. One method was not superior to the other but effective for a particular proposal. No national studies have been found. Research should be conducted on the effectiveness of nursing debriefing methods and techniques.
在护理模拟教学与学习文献中，确定用于指导的方法和技术。
对 PubMed/MEDLINE®、LILACS、Scopus 和 CINAHL®数据库进行综合回顾，使用的检索词包括“护理”、“护理教育”，其英文和西班牙文术语，以及关键词“指导”。纳入的 12 项原始研究来自 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月，语言为葡萄牙语、英语和西班牙语。采用定性分析对各领域进行分类。
确定了基于学习迁移原理的有意义的学习方法；临床推理模式、跨专业、具有良好判断力以及结构化和自我指导技术、口头、眼动追踪、视频辅助和书面指导。
结构化方法和带视频的口头技术效果突出。一种方法并不优于另一种方法，但对于特定方案有效。未发现国家层面的研究。应针对护理指导方法和技术的有效性开展研究。
