Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av. Joao Naves de Avila, 2121, Uberlandia, 38408-100, Brazil.
Bioengineering and Biomechanics Laboratory, Federal University of Goias, Av. Esperanca, s/n, Campus Samambaia, Goiania, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Apr 15;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00764-5.
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are pathological conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint and/or masticatory muscles. The current diagnosis of TMDs is complex and multi-factorial, including questionnaires, medical testing and the use of diagnostic methods, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. The evaluation, like the mandibular range of motion, needs the experience of the professional in the field and as such, there is a probability of human error when diagnosing TMD. The aim of this study is therefore to develop a method with infrared cameras, using the maximum range of motion of the jaw and four types of classifiers to help professionals to classify the pathologies of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and related muscles in a quantitative way, thus helping to diagnose and follow up on TMD.
Forty individuals were evaluated and diagnosed using the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) scale, and divided into three groups: 20 healthy individuals (control group CG), 10 individuals with myopathies (MG), 10 individuals with arthropathies (AG). A quantitative assessment was carried out by motion capture. The TMJ movement was captured with camera tracking markers mounted on the face and jaw of each individual. Data was exported and analyzed using a custom-made software. The data was used to identify and place each participant into one of three classes using the K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Random Forest, Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine algorithms.
Significant precision and accuracy (over 90%) was reached by KNN when classifying the three groups. The other methods tested presented lower values of sensitivity and specificity.
The quantitative TMD classification method proposed herein has significant precision and accuracy over the DC/TMD standards. However, this should not be used as a standalone tool but as an auxiliary method for diagnostic TMDs.
颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)是影响颞下颌关节和/或咀嚼肌的病理状况。目前 TMD 的诊断较为复杂,涉及多个因素,包括问卷调查、医学检查以及使用诊断方法,如计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像。评估,如下颌运动范围,需要该领域专业人员的经验,因此在诊断 TMD 时存在人为错误的可能性。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种使用红外摄像机的方法,采用下颌最大运动范围和四种分类器,帮助专业人员以定量方式对颞下颌关节(TMJ)和相关肌肉的病理进行分类,从而有助于诊断和随访 TMD。
对 40 名个体进行评估和诊断,使用颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准(DC/TMD)量表将其分为三组:20 名健康个体(对照组 CG)、10 名肌病个体(MG)和 10 名关节病个体(AG)。通过运动捕捉进行定量评估。使用相机跟踪标记器捕捉 TMJ 运动,该标记器安装在每个个体的面部和下颌上。使用定制软件导出和分析数据。使用 K-最近邻(KNN)、随机森林、朴素贝叶斯和支持向量机算法来识别和将每位参与者分配到三个类别之一。
KNN 在对三组进行分类时达到了显著的精度和准确性(超过 90%)。其他测试方法的敏感性和特异性较低。
本文提出的定量 TMD 分类方法在 DC/TMD 标准下具有显著的精度和准确性。然而,这不应该作为独立的工具使用,而应该作为诊断 TMD 的辅助方法。