Suppr超能文献

神经质可能并不反映情绪的可变性。

Neuroticism may not reflect emotional variability.

机构信息

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia;

Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9270-9276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919934117. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

Abstract

Neuroticism is one of the major traits describing human personality, and a predictor of mental and physical disorders with profound public health significance. Individual differences in emotional variability are thought to reflect the core of neuroticism. However, the empirical relation between emotional variability and neuroticism may be partially the result of a measurement artifact reflecting neuroticism's relation with higher mean levels-rather than greater variability-of negative emotion. When emotional intensity is measured using bounded scales, there is a dependency between variability and mean levels: at low (or high) intensity, it is impossible to demonstrate high variability. As neuroticism is positively associated with mean levels of negative emotion, this may account for the relation between neuroticism and emotional variability. In a metaanalysis of 11 studies ( = 1,205 participants; 83,411 observations), we tested whether the association between neuroticism and negative emotional variability was clouded by a dependency between variability and the mean. We found a medium-sized positive association between neuroticism and negative emotional variability, but, when using a relative variability index to correct for mean negative emotion, this association disappeared. This indicated that neuroticism was associated with experiencing more intense, but not more variable, negative emotions. Our findings call into question theory, measurement scales, and data suggesting that emotional variability is central to neuroticism. In doing so, they provide a revisionary perspective for understanding how this individual difference may predispose to mental and physical disorders.

摘要

神经质是描述人类个性的主要特征之一,也是心理和身体障碍的预测因素,具有深远的公共卫生意义。情绪可变性的个体差异被认为反映了神经质的核心。然而,情绪可变性和神经质之间的经验关系可能部分是由于测量误差的结果,这种误差反映了神经质与更高的平均水平——而不是更大的负面情绪变异性——的关系。当使用有界量表测量情绪强度时,变异性和平均值之间存在依赖性:在低(或高)强度下,不可能表现出高变异性。由于神经质与负面情绪的平均水平呈正相关,这可能解释了神经质和情绪可变性之间的关系。在对 11 项研究(= 1205 名参与者;83411 个观测值)的荟萃分析中,我们检验了神经质和负面情绪可变性之间的关联是否受到变异性和平均值之间的依赖性的影响。我们发现神经质与负面情绪可变性之间存在中等程度的正相关,但当使用相对变异性指数来校正负面情绪的平均值时,这种关联就消失了。这表明神经质与体验更强烈但不是更可变的负面情绪有关。我们的发现对理论、测量量表和数据提出了质疑,这些理论、测量量表和数据表明情绪可变性是神经质的核心。这样做为理解这种个体差异如何导致心理和身体障碍提供了一个修正的视角。

相似文献

1
Neuroticism may not reflect emotional variability.神经质可能并不反映情绪的可变性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9270-9276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919934117. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Personality Traits and Emotional Word Recognition: An ERP Study.人格特质与情绪词汇识别:一项 ERP 研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Apr;20(2):371-386. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00774-9.
10
The effect of personality on daily life emotional processes.人格对日常生活情绪过程的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 24;9(10):e110907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110907. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

8
Assessing Validity and Bias of Within-Person Variability in Affect and Personality.评估情感与人格中个体内变异性的效度与偏差。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jun;51(6):1078-1094. doi: 10.1177/01461672231208499. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验