• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏病筛查方法的评估。

Assessment of a screening method for heart disease.

作者信息

Gorman D R

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1988 Dec;5(4):297-301. doi: 10.1093/fampra/5.4.297.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/5.4.297
PMID:3229605
Abstract

This study examined the effects of a cardiovascular screening programme on a group of 79 patients in an Edinburgh general practice. Serum cholesterol levels were measured two to four months after the original screening interview and risk scores recalculated to see if the collection of data was reliable; a control group was used. Patient attitudes to this screening were assessed by questionnaire and the repeatability of the risk score calculation investigated. The programme was popular with patients and was successful in changing their reported behaviour. However, it may have been counter-productive in some patients by sanctioning personal habits detrimental to health. This effect was particularly marked in patients at lower risk levels who it is shown may have raised serum cholesterol levels. It is suggested that the risk score calculation could be improved, in particular by improving the accuracy of the serum cholesterol measurement. It is concluded that more research is needed into the behavioural aspects of cardiovascular screening.

摘要

本研究调查了一项心血管筛查项目对爱丁堡一家普通诊所79名患者的影响。在初次筛查访谈后的两到四个月测量血清胆固醇水平,并重新计算风险评分,以检验数据收集是否可靠;同时设立了一个对照组。通过问卷调查评估患者对该筛查的态度,并研究风险评分计算的可重复性。该项目受到患者欢迎,并成功改变了他们报告的行为。然而,对某些患者而言,认可有害健康的个人习惯可能会产生适得其反的效果。这种影响在低风险水平的患者中尤为明显,研究表明这些患者的血清胆固醇水平可能有所升高。建议改进风险评分计算方法,特别是提高血清胆固醇测量的准确性。得出的结论是,需要对心血管筛查的行为方面进行更多研究。

相似文献

1
Assessment of a screening method for heart disease.心脏病筛查方法的评估。
Fam Pract. 1988 Dec;5(4):297-301. doi: 10.1093/fampra/5.4.297.
2
[Total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and blood pressure in relation to life style: results of the first population screening of the Swiss MONIKA Project].[总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇及血压与生活方式的关系:瑞士莫妮卡项目首次人群筛查结果]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Dec 29;120(51-52):1976-88.
3
Prevalence of risk factors for heart disease in OXCHECK trial: implications for screening in primary care. Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group.OXCHECK试验中心脏病危险因素的患病率:对初级保健筛查的意义。帝国癌症研究基金会OXCHECK研究小组。
BMJ. 1991 May 4;302(6784):1057-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6784.1057.
4
Personalized prevention approach with use of a web-based cardiovascular risk assessment with tailored lifestyle follow-up in primary care practice--a pilot study.在初级保健实践中采用基于网络的心血管风险评估并进行个性化生活方式随访的个性化预防方法——一项试点研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Mar;23(5):544-51. doi: 10.1177/2047487315591441. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
5
Factors influencing general practitioners' decisions about cardiovascular disease risk reassessment: findings from experimental and interview studies.影响全科医生进行心血管疾病风险重新评估决策的因素:实验研究与访谈研究的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Aug 5;17:107. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0499-7.
6
[Cardiometabolic risk factors detected with a preventative screening programme].通过预防性筛查计划检测到的心血管代谢危险因素
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A1860.
7
USAF health evaluation and risk tabulation program.美国空军健康评估与风险制表计划
Mil Med. 1983 Feb;148(2):122-6.
8
Cardiovascular risk screening program in Australian community pharmacies.澳大利亚社区药房的心血管疾病风险筛查项目。
Pharm World Sci. 2010 Jun;32(3):373-80. doi: 10.1007/s11096-010-9379-8. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
9
The Vale of Leven health promotion project.利文谷健康促进项目
Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Feb;40(331):64-6.
10
An evaluation of the physical activity and health status of British Columbian Aboriginal populations.不列颠哥伦比亚省原住民人口的体力活动和健康状况评估。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Feb;37(1):127-37. doi: 10.1139/h11-138. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.常规使用全球冠心病风险评分会转化为临床益处还是危害?一项文献系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Mar 20;8:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-60.
2
Near patient testing in general practice: a review.基层医疗中的床边检测:综述
Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Jan;40(330):32-6.